Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC.Industries Holdings, Inc.


(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 




(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)




Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 
(1)
1)

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
  (2)2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (3)3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set(Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
         
  (4)4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
         
  (5)5) Total fee paid:
         

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
  (2)2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
  (3)3) Filing Party:
         
  (4)4) Date Filed:
         

Table of Contents

Proxy Statement


20182020 Annual Meeting of
StockholdersShareholders


LOGO

LOGO


Table of Contents

LOGOLOGO

March 29, 2018April 8, 2020

To Our Stockholders:Shareholders:

On behalf of your board of directors, it is our privilege to invite you to attend the 20182020 annual meeting of stockholdersshareholders of CF Industries Holdings, Inc. The annual meeting will be held on Thursday,Wednesday, May 10, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., local time, adjacent to our corporate headquarters at 3 Parkway North, Deerfield, Illinois 60015.20, 2020. At the annual meeting, stockholdersshareholders will vote on the matters set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and any other business matters properly brought before the annual meeting. Additionally, we will review our corporate performance in 2019 and discuss our strategy and our vision for the future. Whether or not you are able to attend the meeting, we encourage you to read the enclosed materials and submit your proxy.

We will meet Creating Long-Term Shareholder Value

Our corporate vision is to discussbe a yearleading chemical company that delivers superior shareholder returns over the cycle. In support of outstanding performance in all partsthat vision, our strategy is to leverage our core capabilities to drive business results that create long-term value for our shareholders. At the heart of our business and strong progress on our strategic objectives. In 2017, your company delivered strong financial results in a challenging market environment. Westrategy is the CF team. During 2019, these 3,000 individuals set company production andrecords for quarterly sales volumes records whileand ammonia production. Most importantly, we also set a new record for safety performance, achieving our lowest 12-month total recordable injury rate.ever Recordable Injury Rate (RIR). This was accomplished against a backdrop of record flooding that greatly delayed the spring fertilizer application season and disrupted transportation networks in the United States. We reduced our long-term debt by approximately $1.1 billion and lowered our controllable expenses per product ton as a resultare extremely proud of targeted cost reduction initiatives and production cost efficiencies supported by increased volume.

These are exceptional results in one of the weakest global nitrogen pricing environments of the last two decades. This reflects the enduring strengthseach of our company—manufacturing and distribution excellence built on safe and reliable operations; a customer focus that can serve both long-time purchasers and grow new opportunities inside and outside North America; and prudent capital stewardship to optimize our cost structure. We have achieved these results because of our talented, dedicated employees and their commitment and dedication to "Do It Right!" every day.

Our dedication to operational excellence has driven strong financial results and significant free cash flow, with $1.5 billion of cash from operations and $915 million in free cash flow(1) generated in 2019 alone. We have taken a balanced approach to capital allocation, which has prudently positioned the company for the long-term. Since 2017, we have reduced our outstanding debt by $1.85 billion – including the redemption of $750 million in debt in 2019 – substantially reducing our annual fixed charges. Over that same period, we have also returned more than $1.6 billion to shareholders through share-repurchases and dividend payments. We believe our strong balance sheet combined with our superior cash generation provides substantial long-term capital flexibility through the cycle.

The CF team executed our strategy extremely well, and it shows in our results. Since 2017, we have a Total Shareholder Return (TSR) of 66 percent, significantly better than our fertilizer peer group index and also better than the S&P 500. Our company TSR is also substantially better than our fertilizer peer group index over all relevant time periods: 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years. Our strategy, executed well, has clearly delivered against our vision: superior shareholder returns over the cycle.


(1)
Free cash flow is defined as net cash from operating activities less capital expenditures and distributions to noncontrolling interests. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of free cash flow to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

Table of Contents

Increased Focus on Environmental, Social and Governance Issues

We recognize that continuing to build on our strong track record of creating long-term shareholder value requires enhanced focus not only on our operational excellence and corporate stewardship, but also on our longstanding commitment to a sustainable world. As a member of the Business Roundtable and a signatory to the Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation issued by that organization, we take our commitments and obligations to our success.broader stakeholders very seriously.

We continuebelieve transparency is critical as we seek to adheremaximize the benefits of fertilizer while minimizing its impact on the environment in the years ahead. For the first time, we are publishing our sustainability report at the same time as our financial reports, reflecting our internal emphasis on both dimensions. Our sustainability reporting includes our Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) report, in which we report on a comprehensive basis and cover nearly all GRI indicators for each issue. Additionally, we will begin reporting using the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) framework for the chemicals industry this year.

A Strong Future Ahead

As we write this, the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization and is severely affecting economies around the world. CF's focus has been protecting the health and well-being of our employees and everyone whose lives we touch.

Agriculture and fertilizer production are key parts of the food supply chain and, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, have been designated as "essential," and a part of the U.S.


Table of Contents

"critical infrastructure," with a similar designation in the UK. This is for a very simple reason: in times of crisis, availability of food becomes of paramount importance. We serve a vital role in the process that provides food to people and helps to keep peace and order in our society. By protecting our people, we are doing our best principles of corporate governance in order to deliver long-term valuemitigate its impact on our operations and ensure that our vital contribution to you. During 2017,feeding the world continues.

Finally, we elected two new memberswant to recognize John Johnson, who is retiring from the board of directors this year. For the last 20 years, John W. Eaveshas brought tremendous leadership, unparalleled insight and Michael J. Toelle, who have already made significant contributionsa steady voice to the board. He played a critical role in building the company through their leadership, knowledgewe are today and shepherded CF into the modern era as the last chairman of commodity cyclesthe board before CF became a publicly traded company in 2005. We are grateful for his service and special expertise—the global coal industry for John and agriculture for Mike.

We want to take this opportunity to thank our two retiring directors for their tireless commitment to the company and to you, our stockholders. Edward Schmitt has been on the board since the company's IPO in 2005 and has brought a wealth of operational experience to the board. Robert Kuhbach has been a member of our board since 2011, was the chairman of our audit committee from 2012 through 2017, and brought a rigorous financial focus. Ed and Rob, we thank you for your many years of dedicated serviceshareholders and wish youhim all the best in his retirement.

We are proud ofCF Industries is a strong company and positioned well for the progress we have made as a company andfuture. We look forward to reviewing what we have achieved and the opportunities ahead at the annual meeting. Thank you for your continued trust in CF Industries and we hope to see you on May 10, 2018.20, 2020.

Sincerely,

GRAPHICSGRAPHIC GRAPHICSGRAPHIC

Stephen A. Furbacher

 

W. Anthony Will
Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents

GRAPHICLOGO

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS SHAREHOLDERS

Date and Time:

 Thursday,Wednesday, May 10, 2018,20, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., local time


Place:


 


Adjacent to CF Industries Corporate HeadquartersMarriott Suites Deerfield
32 Parkway North
Deerfield, Illinois 60015


Items of Business:


 


At the Annual Meeting, stockholdersshareholders will be asked to:

 

1.

 

Elect the teneleven directors named in this Proxy Statement;

 

2.

 

Consider and approve an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of our named executive officers;

 

3.

 

Ratify provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws granting stockholders the ability to call special meetings of stockholders;

4.

Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018; and

2020;

 

5.

4.
 

Act upon one shareholder proposal regarding the right to act by written consent, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and

5.Consider any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting.


Record Date:


 


You may vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a stockholdershareholder of record of our company as of the close of business on March 19, 201827, 2020


Internet Availability of Proxy Materials


 


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2018 2020Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders to be held on Thursday,Wednesday, May 10, 201820, 2020: Our Proxy Statement and 20172019 Annual Report are available free of charge atwww.proxyvote.com.

We intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person. However, we are actively monitoring the coronavirus (COVID-19) situation. We are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements in advance of the Annual Meeting, and details on how to participate will be issued by press release available on our website at https://www.cfindustries.com and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Your vote is important. Please vote your shares promptly so that your shares will be represented whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting. To vote your shares, you may use the Internet as described on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and proxy card, call the toll-free telephone number listed on your proxy card or complete, sign, date, and return your proxy card.

By order of the board of directors,

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

Douglas C. Barnard
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary

March 29, 2018
April 8, 2020


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 1

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 
6

10

Director Nominees

 610

Director Succession Planning and Nomination Process

 610

Criteria for Board Membership

 813

Board Recommendation

 1116

Director Nominee Biographies

 1217

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 
17

23

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 1723

Director Independence

 1723

Leadership of the Board

 1823

Committees of the Board

 1925

Attendance of Directors at Meetings

 2026

RoleBoard Oversight of the Board inStrategy and Risk OversightManagement

 2026

Code of Corporate ConductBeyond the Boardroom

 2128

StockholderShareholder Engagement

 2129

Communications with Directors

 2129

Political Contributions Report

22

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

 2229

Director Compensation

 2332

COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP

 
25

34

Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

 2534

Common Stock Ownership of Directors and Management

 27

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE


2836

POLICY REGARDING RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

 
29

37

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ("SAY ON PAY")

 
31

Board Recommendation39

31

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 
3240

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 
34

Executive Summary42

34

Development of Compensation Approach and Objectives

36

Compensation Philosophy

36

Components of Compensation

37

Allocation of Compensation Elements

39

Role of the Compensation Committee

39

Role of the Compensation Consultant

40

Compensation Committee Activities

40

2017 Cash Compensation

42

2017 Long-term Incentives

47

2018 Compensation

51

Change in Control, Severance, and Retirement Benefits

55

Compensation of Chief Executive Officer

57

Industry Reference Group

59

Financial Restatements

60

Stock Ownership Guidelines

60

Trading, Hedging and Pledging Restrictions

61

Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation

61

Compensation Consultant Matters

61

Compensation and Benefits Risk Analysis

61

COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT

 
63

78

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 
64

79

PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF PROVISIONSSELECTION OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS GRANTING STOCKHOLDERS THE ABILITY TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERSINDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR 2020

 
76

96

Board Recommendation

 78

PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR 2018


79

Board Recommendation

7996

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

 7996

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

 8097

Auditor Independence

 8097

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

 
81

99

PROPOSAL 4: SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING THE RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT

100

The Board's Statement in Opposition

101

ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

 
82

103

Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting and Voting

 82103

Important Additional Information

 85107

Deadlines for Submission of Future StockholderShareholder Proposals, StockholderShareholder Nominated Director Candidates and Other Business of StockholdersShareholders

 86107

OTHER MATTERS

 
87

108

APPENDIX A: NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONSRECONCILIATION

 

A-1


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary provides certain key information about CF Industries' business and strategy and highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. These proxy materials were first sent or made available to stockholdersshareholders on or about March 29, 2018.April 8, 2020.

20182020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSSHAREHOLDERS INFORMATION

Date and Time: Thursday,Wednesday, May 10, 2018,20, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (local time)
Place: Adjacent to CF Industries Corporate HeadquartersMarriott Suites Deerfield
32 Parkway North
Deerfield, Illinois 60015
Record Date: March 19, 201827, 2020

We intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person. However, we are actively monitoring the coronavirus (COVID-19) situation. We are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements in advance of the Annual Meeting, and details on how to participate will be issued by press release available on our website at https://www.cfindustries.com and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

VOTING MATTERS

Proposals
Proposals
 Board
Recommendation
 Page Number for
Additional
Information
 Proposals Board
Recommendation 
 Page
Number for
Additional
Information 

1.

 

Election of Directors

 FOR 6  Election of Directors FOR 10

2.

 

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation ("Say on Pay")

 FOR 31  Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation ("Say on Pay") FOR 39

3.

 

Ratification of Provisions in Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws Granting Stockholders the Ability to Call Special Meetings of Stockholders

 FOR 76  Ratification of Selection of Independent Auditor for 2020 FOR 96

4.

 

Ratification of Selection of Independent Auditor for 2018

 FOR 79  Shareholder Proposal Regarding the Right to Act by Written Consent, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting AGAINST 100

OUR BUSINESS

CF Industries is a leading global fertilizer and chemical company with outstanding operational capabilities and a highly cost advantagedcost-advantaged production and distribution platform. Our 3,000 employees operate world-class manufacturing complexes in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. Our customers include both agricultural and industrial users of our products. Our principal nitrogen products are ammonia, granular urea, urea ammonium nitrate solution, and ammonium nitrate. We also manufacture diesel exhaust fluid, urea liquor, nitric acid, and aqua ammonia, which are sold primarily to industrial customers, and compound fertilizer products, which are solid granular fertilizer products for which the nutrient content is a combination of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. We serve our customers in North America through an unparalleled production, storage, transportation and distribution network. We also reach a global customer base with exports from our Donaldsonville, Louisiana, plant, the world's largest and most flexible nitrogen complex. Additionally, we move product to international destinations from our Verdigris, Oklahoma, facility, our Yazoo City, Mississippi, facility, our Billingham and Ince facilities in the United Kingdom, and from a joint venture ammonia facility in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago in which we own a 50 percent interest.

For more information on our business, see "Item 1.—Business" and "Item 7.—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our 20172019 Annual Report.


Table of Contents

OUR STRATEGY

Our strategy, reviewed and endorsed annually by our Board, has remained largely unchanged for the past decade. Our execution of initiatives aligned with that strategy helped us achieve our vision—delivering superior shareholder returns over the cycle.

Core Organizational Capabilities

We want to highlight a few of our core organizational capabilities as evidenced by several of our more notable accomplishments:

Leader in the safe and responsible production, storage and handling of chemicals, achieving best in class performance

Achieved industry leading recordable injury rate of 0.67 (industry average: 2.2), our lowest rate, while being the largest nitrogen producer in the world (2017)

Multi-year winner of the Rail Safety—Grand Slam Award for safe rail shipments of hazardous products (2014 and 2016)

Reduced CO2-equivalent emissions by more than 25% per product ton of manufactured product (2012 - 2016)

Exceptional process engineering and plant operations and maintenance, to drive superior asset utilization

Ammonia production capacity utilization at 98% across 17 ammonia plants globally (2017)

New capacity expansion plants started up safely and have achieved 15 - 20% higher output than original nameplate capacity (2016 - 2017)

Decreased capital expenditures per product ton by 63% and ongoing maintenance capital expenditures per product ton by 36%,(1) while maintaining safe and reliable operations (2013 - 2017)

Decreased cost of sales per product ton by 8% and controllable cost of sales per product ton(2) by 19% (2015 - 2017)

High performance culture, focused on safety, ethics and compliance, creating a world-class, scalable corporate platform:

SG&A among the lowest in the industry at $10 per product ton or 4.6% of sales (2017)

Highly scalable corporate platform as product tons increased 45% while SG&A cost per product ton decreased 22% (2015 - 2017)


(1)
"Ongoing maintenance capital expenditures" is defined as capital expenditures adjusted for amounts related to our capacity expansion projects, our divested phosphate business, and improvement projects. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of ongoing maintenance capital expenditures and ongoing maintenance capital expenditures per ton to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

(2)
"Controllable cost of sales" is defined as non-gas cash costs (maintenance, labor, electricity, other raw materials, transportation and distribution, and other plant costs), which excludes the impact of natural gas, derivatives and depreciation and amortization. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of controllable cost of sales and controllable cost of sales per ton to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

Table of Contents

Creative, disciplined portfolio management, increasing shareholder value:

Terra Industries post-merger-integration captured synergies in excess of $120 million annually (2010 - 2012)

Sold our Phosphate Business for $1.4 billion in a tax-efficient transaction and also entered into a long-term ammonia supply agreement with the buyer, which de-risked the capacity expansion projects (2013 - 2014)

CF Fertilisers UK (formerly known as GrowHow) post-merger-integration increased asset utilization by nearly 20% and delivered synergies in excess of $35 million annually (2014 - 2017)

Formed a strategic venture with CHS where CF Industries received $2.8 billion in a tax-efficient structure and also entered into a long-term supply agreement with CHS, which further de-risked the capacity expansion projects (2015 - 2016)

Deployed approximately $6.7 billion in value-creating growth initiatives while also returning more than $5 billion of cash to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends (2013 - 2017)

Our Corporate Strategy

Our vision, given the cyclical nature of our business, is to deliver superior shareholder returns over the cycle. Our strategy, in support of our vision, is built upon a foundation of distinct core capabilities and core values that we live each and every day. We leverage our capabilities to drive business results that create long-term value for our shareholders. Our strategy is reviewed and endorsed annually by our Board and the Board plays an active role in measuring our ability to execute it successfully.

Our strategy for creating long-term shareholder value is directly aligned with our mission: We feed the crops that feed the world and produce the building blocks for a better life, and we do so efficiently, safely, and sustainably. Fertilizer is responsible for helping to grow the crops that comprise about half of the world's food supply, which makes life possible for billions of people. Fertilizer also supports sustainable food production because it increases yield per acre, which means farmers need less land to grow the food the world's population needs to survive. By increasing crop yields, we help limit the conversion of carbon-sequestering forests into farmland. We also manufacture products that reduce greenhouse gas emissions from industrial processes. In addition, our diesel exhaust fluid product helps reduce nitrous oxide emissions of heavy-duty trucks and marine vessels. For further discussion of our corporate responsibility and sustainability practices, see "Corporate Governance — Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability."

Manufacturing chemical products responsibly requires a focus on safety. At CF Industries, safety is more than just a requirement — it is a point of pride and ingrained in our corporate culture and values. This commitment is illustrated by our industry leading safety statistics. At CF Industries, we believe that our strong safety record is a result of our focus on behavioral safety practices. During 2018 and 2019, we further demonstrated our commitment to


Table of Contents

operational excellence and safety by incorporating an operational metric into our annual incentive plan which was based on our achievement of ammonia production goals, subject to first achieving a gating level of performance on behavioral safety practices. See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" for further information.

Strong Shareholder Returns Over the Cycle

We firmly believe that, due to the cyclical nature of the commodity chemical industry in which we operate, it is important to view performance over a longer time horizon than just one year. TheOur execution of initiatives aligned with our strategy has delivered stronghelped us achieve our vision — delivering superior shareholder value creationreturns over the cycle:cycle. The following table shows the cumulative total shareholder return, assuming the reinvestment of dividends, for our common stock and a peer group index for the 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10-year periods ended December 31, 2019.


Total Shareholder Return (TSR)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

Each of the peer group companies was a publicly traded manufacturer of agricultural chemical fertilizers. The companies comprising the peer group are:

Agrium,  Inc.*

The Mosaic Company

LSB Industries,  Inc.

Incitec Pivot Limited

OCI N.V.**

Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc.*

Nutrien Ltd.*

CVR Partners LP**

Yara International ASA

*
Agrium, Inc. (Agrium) and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (Potash Corp) are included in the peer group companies from December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2017. On January 2, 2018, Agrium and Potash Corp completed a merger of equals transaction to form Nutrien, Ltd. The cumulative investment in each of Agrium and Potash Corp, assuming dividend reinvestments up to December 31, 2017, was converted into shares of Nutrien, Ltd. on January 2, 2018 using the exchange ratio in the merger of equals transaction consummated on that date. Nutrien, Ltd. was included in the peer group companies for the period from January 2, 2018 through December 31, 2019.

**
CVR Partners LP and OCI N.V. were excluded from the calculation of the 10-year total shareholder return because they each had less than 10-years of trading history.

For purposes of calculating the TSR of CF Industries and the peer group index for the 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10-year periods ending December 31, 2019, the beginning stock price for each peer group company was established by its respective closing price on the last trading day immediately preceding January 1 of the first fiscal year of the applicable measurement period. The returns of the peer group companies were weighted according to their respective market capitalizations as of the date used to establish the beginning stock price. For Yara International ASA, Incitec Pivot Limited and OCI N.V., we used their respective home exchange stock prices, converted into U.S. dollars for TSR calculation purposes.


Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT2019 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

We believe that building positive relationships with our stockholders is critical to CF Industries' success. We valueOperating Results

Net Earnings
Attributable to
Common Stockholders
Earnings Per
Diluted Share
EBITDA(1)Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities

$493 Million

$2.23

$1.6 Billion

$1.5 Billion

Annual Incentive Plan Performance Metrics

Adjusted EBITDA(2)Behavioral Safety
Gate Threshold
Gross Ammonia
Production

$1.6 Billion

Achieved
98.7%

10.2 Million Tons
Target: $1.4 BillionThreshold:³ 95%(3)Target: 10.0 Million Tons

When setting performance levels for the views of,short-term incentive program, the compensation and regularly communicate with, our stockholders on a variety of topics, such as ourmanagement development committee considers the previous year's financial performance, corporate governance, executive compensation,market trends and related matters. Management shares the feedback received fromcompany's annual business plan. Actual results in 2019 exceeded the company's plan as product prices improved more than anticipated — contributing to higher revenue and margins. During 2019, we also exceeded our production goals in part due to our best-in-class operational capabilities that enable us to produce more product than other comparable manufacturers. At the same time, the cost of our principal feedstock, natural gas, declined compared to the prior year and much more than the market expectations reflected in forward market curves when setting our annual business plan. This combination of a more advantageous pricing environment, lower natural gas cost, and efficient production contributed to the above-target financial results, and, therefore, an above-target payout for the annual incentive program.

Additionally, the company continued to deliver against its strategic priorities and create long-term shareholder value.

SafetyAs of December 31, 2019, the company's 12-month rolling average recordable incident rate was 0.48 incidents per 200,000 work hours – an industry leading result
Operational ExcellenceLong-term asset utilization-and-production is approximately 12 percent higher than the average utilization rate of our North American competitors
EfficiencySG&A costs as a percent of sales remain among the lowest in both the chemicals and fertilizer industries
Return to ShareholdersReturned $602 million to shareholders through $337 million in share repurchases and $265 million in dividend payments
Reduced Debt and Fixed ChargesDuring 2019, we retired $750 million of outstanding indebtedness, reducing annual cash interest expense in 2020 by $44 million compared to 2019

Table of Contents

OUR BOARD COMPOSITIONDIRECTOR NOMINEES

Our corporate governance and nominating committee regularly reviews the overall composition of our Board and its committees to assess whether each reflects the appropriate mix of experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that are relevant to CF Industries' current and future global strategy, business, and governance.

Our Director NomineesGRAPHIC


(1)
AC = Audit Committee

CC = Compensation and Management Development Committee

GC = Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

   C = Committee Chair


GRAPHICTable of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FACTSHIGHLIGHTS

We are committed to implementing sound corporate governance practices that enhance the effectiveness of the Board and our management and that serve the interests of our shareholders. Highlights of our governance practices include:

ü
​   All Directors are Independent, except CEO
ü IndependentGovernance Practice

For More Information
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  
Board Structure
and Governance


All of director nominees areindependent, except for our CEO. All of our standing Board committees are 100 percent independent.

We have anindependent Chairman of the Board and separate Chief Executive Officer.

Our directors areelected annually based on amajority voting standard for uncontested elections. We have aresignation policy if a director fails to receive a majority of votes cast.

Each of ourdirectors attended 75% or more of the combined total meetings of the full Board and the committees on which he or she served during 2019.

Our non-management directors meet inexecutive session, without management present, following each regularly scheduled Board meeting.

AnnualBoard and committee self-assessments and peer evaluations monitor the performance and effectiveness of the Board and its committees and directors.

The Chairman of the Board and Separate Chief Executive Officer

üchair of the governance committee lead an active process toregularly assess Board composition and attributes and consider succession planning.

We considerdiversity of background, including experience and skills as well as personal characteristics such as race, gender and age, in identifying nominees for director and incorporate recruitment protocols in our candidate searches that seek to identify candidates with these diversity characteristics.

Board plays an active role inreviewing and approving our strategy, and in measuring our ability to execute it successfully.

DiligentBoard oversight of risk management, including climate change, is a cornerstone of the company's risk management program.

Board has an integral oversight role inhuman capital management and engages with senior management on a broad range of topics including culture, talent development, compensation, employee recruiting and retention, and diversity and inclusion.

 Regular Assessment of Board Composition and Attributes, Including Diversity; Women Comprise 20% of Director Nominees
ü Annual Election of Directors
üP. 23-25

P. 23-24

P. 10



P. 26

P. 24

P. 24

P. 10-12

P. 13

P. 26-27

P. 26-28

P. 27-28

 Majority Voting for Directors in Uncontested Elections
ü​ ​ 
​   Proxy Access
Stock
Ownership


We have strongstock ownership guidelines for our executive officers and directors.

Weprohibit hedging and pledging of our common stock by directors and executive officers.

We have a robustclawback policy covering incentive awards.

P. 75-76

P. 77

P. 76-77

​ ​ 
​  
Corporate
Responsibility


Ourethics program includes a strong Code of Corporate Conduct for all of our directors, officers and employees.

We discussCorporate Responsibility on our website and in ourCorporate Sustainability Report, including our values and "Do It Right" culture, our commitment to our stakeholders and communities, and strong corporate commitment torespect the dignity and human rights of others.

We providedisclosure of charitable contributions and corporate political contributions and trade associate dues in semi-annual reports.

P. 29-30

www.cfindustries.com/ sustainability-at-cf-industries

www.cfindustries.com/reports

​ ​ 
​  
Shareholder
Rights


Eligible shareholders can utilize theproxy access provisions of our bylaws to include their own nominees for director in our proxy materials along with Board-nominated candidates.

Wedo not have a shareholder rights plan, or poison pill. Our Board has adopted a policy whereby any rights plan adopted without shareholder approval must be submitted to shareholders for ratification, or the plan must expire, within one year of such adoption.

Our shareholders have theright to call a special meeting of shareholders.

Allsupermajority voting provisions have been eliminated from our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws.

P. 12; Bylaws






Bylaws

Charter and Bylaws

​ ​ 

Table of Contents

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

We believe that building positive relationships with our shareholders is critical to CF Industries' success. We value the views of, and regularly communicate with, our shareholders on a variety of topics, such as our financial performance, corporate governance, executive compensation, and related matters. Management shares the feedback received from shareholders with the Board. Our chairman, our committee chairs, and other members of the Board may also be available to participate in meetings with shareholders as appropriate. Requests for such a meeting are considered on a case-by-case basis. Our engagement activities have resulted in valuable feedback that has contributed to our decision-making with respect to these matters.

We conduct shareholder outreach campaigns in the spring and in the fall. Our engagements in the spring are primarily focused on ballot items on which shareholders will vote at our annual meeting. Our engagements in the fall generally focus on voting outcomes from our prior annual meeting – including direct shareholder feedback on how they voted on ballot items – as well as potential corporate governance or executive compensation changes the Board and its committees are considering. The fall engagement also presents an opportunity to discuss with shareholders developments in their methodologies and analyses and potential future areas of focus.

GRAPHIC

In the first half of 2019 leading up to our 2019 annual meeting, we contacted shareholders comprising approximately 75% of our outstanding shares to invite them to speak with members of our senior management and the chair of our compensation and management development committee. Combined, management and our compensation and management development committee chair met with shareholders representing approximately 23% of our outstanding shares in advance of our 2019 annual meeting, discussing with these shareholders the ballot items on which shareholders would be voting at our 2019 annual meeting, in particular our 2018 executive compensation program and the say-on-pay vote, and other governance focused matters.

During the second half of 2019 following our 2019 annual meeting, we contacted shareholders comprising approximately 75% of our outstanding shares inviting them to speak with members of our senior management. Combined, management and our compensation and management development committee chair held meetings with shareholders accounting for 42% of our outstanding shares, discussing with these shareholders the voting outcome from our 2019 annual meeting as well as general governance, compensation, corporate responsibility and sustainability matters.


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

Our executive compensation practices are overseen and administered by the compensation and management development committee, which is comprised exclusively of independent directors. The committee is responsible for designing an executive compensation program – including approving any changes to it – that effectively incentivizes our executives to create long-term value for our shareholders.

ü
​   Policy on Adoption of a Stockholder Rights Plan
ü Independent Directors Meet Regularly in Executive Session
ü Stock Ownership Requirements for Directors and Executive OfficersSummary
ü
 Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations, Including Peer EvaluationsMore Details
ü​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​   Stockholder Ability to Call Special Meetings
Compensation
Philosophy
ü

 Our compensation philosophy seeks toalign the interests of our employees and our shareholders through focusing on the total compensation (base salary, short-term incentives, long-term incentives, and benefits) of our employees, including our executive officers. We seek to benefit from this strategy byattracting key talent, retaining strong performers, increasing productivity, and maximizing operational and financial results, while also implementing compensation programs that arecost effective, market competitive, and sustainable across business cycles.P. 54
​ ​ 
​  
Key Elements of
Compensation Program


SalaryPaid in line with individual performance and contribution to company goals and aligned to competitive market dataP. 55,59
​ ​ 
​  Annual Cash IncentivesThe amount of the actual incentive earned is determined based on our level of achievement of two performance metrics:

75%: level of achievement ofAdjusted EBITDA* (Primary Metric)

25%: level of achievement ofammonia production goals, subject to first achieving a gating level of performance onbehavioral safety practices (Secondary Metric)

P. 55, 59-65
​ ​ 
​  Long-Term Equity IncentivesA specified cash value amount is split among two different equity award types:

60%: PRSUs (3-year cliff vesting based on averagereturn on net assets (RONA)* over three one-year periods, and a TSR modifier that can decrease or increase payout by up to 20%)

40%: RSUs (3-year ratable vesting)

P. 55, 65-69
​ ​ 
​  
Rigorous Benchmarking and
Incentive Target Setting


Bench-markingOur total direct compensation istargeted at the 50th percentile of our Industry Reference Group, which is comprised of 17 companies in related industries, and the overall general industry market data.P. 57
​ ​ 
Incentive Metrics and Performance Levels

We utilize performance metrics for our incentive compensation programsthat align executive interests with those of our shareholders

Executives are focused on achieving top performance across metrics that aredirectly tied to shareholder value creation and our core strategic objectives

The compensation and management development committee considersthe previous year's financial performance, market trends and the company's annual business plan when setting goals and targets for our incentive compensation programs

The performance metrics and target performance levels reflectthe inherent cyclicality of our business

P. 55-58,

60-64,

66-71

​ ​ 
​  
Leading Compensation
Governance Practices


Our leading compensation governance practices include:

Strong pay-for-performance alignment

Robust clawback policy covering incentive awards

Stock ownership guidelines

Performance metrics that align executive interests with interests of shareholders

A majority of compensation for CEO and other executive officers is performance-based, at risk, and paid in equity


No Supermajority Voting Provisions in Charteremployment agreements

No repriced stock options

Minimal perquisites

Executive officers are prohibited from hedging or Bylawspledging our stock

No new excise tax gross-ups after 2011 (CEO, CFO and SVP-HR have no such gross-up)

​ ​ 
*
For the definitions of Adjusted EBITDA and RONA, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Discussion and Analysis: In Detail – Key Elements of NEO Compensation Program – Our Metrics Defined."

Table of Contents

2019 Target Total Compensation

The compensation and management development committee believes the majority of compensation should be composed of awards that are performance-based – with direct ties to the Company and individual employee performance. The significant majority of the target compensation of each named executive officer ("NEO") is at-risk based on company performance.

The following graphs illustrate the mix of total target direct compensation for our chief executive officer and for our other named executive officers for 2019:

GRAPHIC

AIP: Annual Incentive Plan (annual bonus), cash settled

LTIP: Long-Term Incentive Plan, denominated in equity


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Our directors are elected each year for one-year terms expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders.shareholders. The Board has nominated ten currentthe eleven directors named in this Proxy Statement for re-election at the 20182020 Annual Meeting. Robert G. Kuhbach and Edward A. SchmittJohn D. Johnson will retire from the Board effective as of the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting and will not stand for re-election. Each director elected at the 20182020 Annual Meeting will serve a one-year term and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

Each nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. If any nominee becomes unavailable to serve, an event that the Board does not presently expect, we will vote the shares represented by proxies for the election of directors for the election of such other person as the Board may recommend. Unless otherwise instructed, we will vote all proxies we receive FOR the directors listed below.

Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors

Our directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections (the number of shares voted "for" a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast "against" that director nominee). An "uncontested election of directors" means an election of directors in which, as of the date that is fourteen days in advance of the date we file our definitive proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the number of nominees for election does not exceed the number of directors to be elected by the stockholdersshareholders at that election. In a contested election (a situation where the number of nominees for election exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the standard for election would be a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors.

Director Resignation Policy

In accordance with procedures set forth in the company's corporate governance guidelines, any incumbent director (including the teneleven nominees standing for election at the Annual Meeting) who fails to receive a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election will be required to tender his or her resignation for consideration by the company's corporate governance and nominating committee. The corporate governance and nominating committee will consider the resignation and, within 45 days following the date of the applicable annual meeting, make a recommendation to the Board concerning the acceptance or rejection of the resignation. The Board will then take formal action on the corporate governance and nominating committee's recommendation no later than 90 days following the date of the annual meeting. Following the Board's decision on the committee's recommendation, we will publicly disclose the Board's decision, together with an explanation of the process by which the decision was made and, if applicable, the Board's reason or reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.

DIRECTOR SUCCESSION PLANNING AND NOMINATION PROCESS

The Board is responsible for nominating members for election to the Board and for filling vacancies on the Board that may occur between annual meetings of stockholders.shareholders. The corporate governance and nominating committee is responsible for identifying, screening, and recommending candidates to the Board for Board membership.


Table of Contents

Regular Assessment of our Board Composition and Succession Planning

The chairman of the board and chair of the corporate governance and nominating committee lead an active process to regularly review the overall composition of the Board and each Board committee and assess whether each reflects the appropriate mix of experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that


Table of Contents

are relevant to CF Industries' current and future global strategy, business, and governance. Board composition and succession planning is a standing item on the agendacalendar for each regular corporate governance and nominating committee meeting.meetings each year. The review process incorporates the results of the annual Board and committee performance and skills self-assessment processprocesses described under the heading "Corporate Governance — Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations and Director Peer Evaluations" in assessing and determining whether any gaps in experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills exist and the characteristics and critical skills required of prospective candidates for election to the Board.

In order to maintain a Board with an appropriate mix of experience and qualifications and to permit time for orientation, the succession planning process generally considers the development of the Board over the next five year time horizon. In the case of an anticipated change in the composition of the Board, whether as a result of a retirement consistent with our general aged-based retirement policy described below or otherwise, the Board generally prefers to recruit and add new directors such that there is time for the new directors to learn in detail our strategy, business, and governance sufficiently in advance of expected departures. The Board has also concluded that the appropriate number of directors is generally no fewer than eight nor more than twelve. The Board believes this range permits diversity of experience without hindering effective discussion or diminishing individual accountability. Therefore, the Board attempts to coordinate director additions and departures to maintain this size while allowing orientation time for new members as discussed above. Consistent with this process, the Board has added foursix new independent members over the past foursix years (Ms. Wagler in 2014, Ms. Noonan in 2015, and Messrs. Eaves and TolleToelle in 2017)2017, and Messrs. Ahmed and White in 2018), and twothree independent directors (Messrs. Kuhbach and Schmitt) are retiring effectivewill retire or have retired over the past three years (Mr. John D. Johnson will retire as of the date of the Annual Meeting.2020 annual meeting and Messrs. Robert G. Kuhbach and Edward A. Schmitt retired in 2018). Given our general aged-based retirement policy described below, in addition to Mr. Johnson, at least two more of our current directors are expected to retire within the next three years. In order to coordinate this refreshment in accordance with the Board's intention to allow orientation time for new directors while maintaining the benefit of departing director's experience, the Board expects these additional two current directors will retire over the course of the next two annual meetings.

Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Director

The corporate governance and nominating committee generally identifies potential nominees by engaging third party search firms that specialize in identifying director candidates. Current directors and executive officers may also notify the committee if they become aware of potential candidates, and the committee refers such persons meetingto the third party search firm to first evaluate whether the candidate meets the criteria for Board membership discussed below. The committee will also consider candidates recommended by stockholdersshareholders as described below.

Once a person has been identified by the corporate governance and nominating committee as a potential candidate, the committee may collect and review publicly available information regarding the person to assess whether the person should be considered further. If the corporate governance and nominating committee determines that the candidate warrants further consideration, the committee chair or another member of the committee will contact the person. Generally, if the person expresses a willingness to be considered and to serve on


Table of Contents

the Board, the corporate governance and nominating committee will request information from the candidate, review the person's accomplishments and qualifications, including in light of any other candidates that the committee might be considering, and conduct one or more interviews with the candidate. In certain instances, committee members may contact one or more references provided by the candidate or may contact other members of the business community or other persons who may have greater first-hand knowledge of the candidate's accomplishments. The committee's evaluation process will not vary based on whether or not a candidate is recommended by a stockholder,shareholder, although, as stated below, the committee may take into consideration the number of shares held by the recommending stockholdershareholder and the length of time that such shares have been held.

Recent Director Searches

As a result of our active succession planning and candidate evaluation processes, directors Ahmed, Eaves, Noonan, Toelle, Wagler and WaglerWhite were identified as candidates and added to the Board over the last foursix years. Each of these independent directors brings important skills and experience to our company that have further strengthened and complemented our Board. Each of these foursix individuals was recommended for consideration to the corporate governance and nominating committee by a third party search firm, and


Table of Contents

none of these foursix individuals was known to our chairman of the board or chief executive officer prior to the candidate evaluation process.

StockholderShareholder Recommendations of Director Candidates

The corporate governance and nominating committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders.shareholders. In considering candidates submitted by stockholders,shareholders, the committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board and the qualifications of the candidate. To have a candidate considered by the committee, a stockholdershareholder must submit the recommendation in writing and include the following information:

the name of the stockholdershareholder and evidence of the person's ownership of our stock, including the number of shares owned and the length of time of ownership; and

the name of the candidate, the candidate's resume or a listing of his or her qualifications to be a director of CF Industries, and the person's consent to be named as a director if selected by the committee and nominated by the Board.

The stockholdershareholder recommendation and information described above must be sent c/o the corporate secretary to our principal executive offices at the address on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement and must be received by the corporate secretary not less than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of our most recent annual meeting of stockholders.shareholders.

Proxy Access

Our bylaws allow eligible stockholdersshareholders to include their own nominees for director in our proxy materials along with the Board-nominated candidates. Subject to applicable procedural and other requirements under our bylaws, the proxy access provisions of our bylaws permit any stockholdershareholder or group of up to 20 stockholdersshareholders who have maintained continuous qualifying ownership of 3% or more of our outstanding common stock for at least the previous three years to nominate and include in our proxy materials director nominees constituting not more than 25% of the number of the directors in office at the time of the nomination.


Table of Contents

CRITERIA FOR BOARD MEMBERSHIP

Director Qualifications and Attributes

The corporate governance and nominating committee takes into consideration a number of factors and criteria in reviewing candidates for potential nomination to the Board. The corporate governance and nominating committee believes that the minimum qualifications for serving as a director of CF Industries are that a nominee demonstrate, by significant accomplishment in his or her field, an ability to make a meaningful contribution to the Board's oversight of our business and affairs and have an impeccable record and reputation for honest and ethical conduct in both his or her professional and personal activities.

In addition, the committee will examine a candidate's specific experiences and skills, relevant industry background and knowledge, time availability in light of other commitments, potential conflicts of interest, material relationships with CF Industries, and independence from management and the company.

Diversity

Our corporate governance guidelines and corporate governance and nominating committee charter reflect the intention of the Board that the board of directors represent a diversity of backgrounds. In accordance with the corporate governance and nominating committee charter and our corporate


Table of Contents

governance guidelines, the corporate governance and nominating committee considers diversity in identifying nominees for director, including personal characteristics such as race, gender and age, and the experiences and skills relevant to the Board's performance of its responsibilities in the oversight of the company. In furtherance of this objective, the corporate governance and nominating committee has determined that it will incorporate recruitment protocols that seek to identify candidates in any future director search who meet these diversity characteristics. As discussed above, six new independent directors have joined our Board over the last five years. These directors' experience and skills backgrounds include senior executive leadership (three sitting or retired chief executive officers, a sitting chief financial officer, and a global supply chain executive) and two directors with expertise in agriculture. In terms of personal characteristics, these directors include two women, an African American, and a director of Asian origin who lives in Europe and has dual citizenship in the US and UK.

Retirement Age

As set forth in the company's corporate governance guidelines, it is the general policy of the company that no director having attained the age of 74 years shall be nominated for re-election or reappointment to the Board. However, the Board may determine to waive this policy in individual cases.

Director Tenure

To ensure that the Board maintains an appropriate balance of experience, continuity, and an openness to new ideas and a willingness to critically re-examine the status quo, the corporate governance and nominating committee considers the issue of continuing director tenure in connection with each director nomination recommendation.

FourThree director nominees, comprising 40%27% of the nominees, have served more than 10 years and onethree director nominee,nominees, comprising 10%27% of the nominees, hashave served between 5 and 10 years. These directors bring a wealth of experience and knowledge concerning CF Industries.


Table of Contents

The remaining five director nominees, comprising 50%46% of the nominees, have joined the Board over the past five years and bring fresh perspective to Board deliberations.

Service on Other Public Company Boards

CF Industries does not have a policy limiting the number of other publicThe company boards of directors upon which a director may sit, in general. However, the corporate governance and nominating committee considers the number of other public company boards and other boards (or comparable governing bodies) on which a prospective nominee is a member.

Although we do not impose a limit on outside directorships, we do recognizerecognizes the substantial time commitments attendant to Board membership and expectexpects that the members of our Board be fully committed to devoting all such time as is necessary to fulfill their Board responsibilities, both in terms of both preparation for and attendance and participation at meetings. Accordingly, directors should generally not serve on more than three other public company boards. A director who also serves as the chief executive officer or named executive officer of a public company generally should not serve on the board of more than one other public company.

In addition, in recognition of the enhanced time commitments associated with membership on a public company's audit committee, the Board has adopted a policy that no member of the audit committee may serve simultaneously on the audit committees of more than two other public companies unless the Board determines that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such director to effectively serve on the company's audit committee.


Table of Contents

Summary of Director Core Competencies

We consider the depth and diversity of experience on our Board a key strength. Our teneleven director nominees offer a diverse set of qualifications and perspectives and possess a wealth of leadership and professional experience. As discussed under the heading "Corporate Governance — Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations and Director Peer Evaluations," the chair of our corporate governance and nominating committee sponsors an annual self-assessment of director skills and experience in areas relevantwhich each director ranks the importance of various business experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills and rates the director's competency level in the skills. The following table summarizes experiences and skills that we have identified as key to CF Industries'our current and future global strategy, business, and strategy.governance.







Public Company Governance


 

A deep understanding of the Board's duties and responsibilities enhances board effectiveness and ensures independent oversight that is aligned with stockholdershareholder interests.

​ ​ 
​  


Senior Executive Leadership


 

We believe that directors who have served as CEOs or senior executives are in a position to challenge management and contribute practical insight into business strategy and operations.

​ ​ 
​  


Operations


 

As a global manufacturing and distribution company, we benefit from the experience of our directors who have served in senior executive roles of global manufacturing companies.

​ ​ 
​  


Accounting and Finance Expertise


 

A strong understanding of accounting and finance is important for ensuring the integrity of our financial reporting and critically evaluating our performance. Our directors have significant accounting experience and corporate finance expertise.

​ ​ 
​  


Industry Focus


 

As one of the world's largest manufacturers and distributors of nitrogen fertilizer and other nitrogen products, we seek directors who are knowledgeable about the chemical, energy, and agriculture industries. These directors help guide the company in assessing trends and external forces in these industries.

​ ​ 
​  


International Business


 

Directors with international business experience help us as we develop and grow our international manufacturing operations and global product distribution.

​ ​ 
​  


Strategic Initiatives


 

Experience with major strategic initiatives, including mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and partnerships, substantial capital projects, and integration helps our company identify, pursue and consummate the right major initiatives that achieve our strategic objectives and realize synergies and optimal growth.

​ ​ 
​  


Risk Management


 

Directors with significant risk oversight and management experience provide valuable insight as we make decisions on our strategic plan.

​ ​ 
​  


Environmental & Safety


 

As core values, we put safety first and act as stewards for the environment. We take guidance from our directors who have served in executive or operating positions at industrial manufacturing companies.

​ 

Table of Contents

The following chart summarizes the competencies represented by our director nominees; the details of each director's competencies are included in each director's biography.

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

In connection with the Annual Meeting and in accordance with the above guidelines, the corporate governance and nominating committee recommended that the Board nominate the teneleven directors named in this Proxy Statement for re-election to the Board. The Board believes these nominees provide CF Industries with the combined depth and breadth of skills, experience and qualities required to contribute to an effective and well-functioning Board. Our teneleven director nominees offer a diverse set of qualifications and perspectives and possess a wealth of leadership and professional experience in areas relevant to our current and future global strategy, business, and governance.

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the election of the nominees presented in Proposal 1.


Table of Contents

DIRECTOR NOMINEE BIOGRAPHIES

The following is biographical information about each of our director nominees, and highlights the particular experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills possessed by each director nominee that led the Board to determine that he or she is qualified to serve as a public company director and that he or she should serve as member of our Board. All director nominee biographical information is as of March 29, 2018.April 8, 2020.





​  


GRAPHICGRAPHIC











Javed Ahmed

Javed Ahmed served as chief executive officer of Tate & Lyle PLC, a British-headquartered, global provider of solutions and ingredients for food, beverage and industrial markets with facilities and offices in over 30 locations worldwide and whose products are sold or distributed in over 120 countries, from October 2009 until April 2018. Prior to this role, he spent 17 years with Benckiser NV (later Reckitt Benckiser Group plc), a leading consumer products group, in a number of senior roles. He began his career with Procter & Gamble before spending five years with Bain & Co.

Qualifications
As the former chief executive officer of Tate & Lyle PLC, Mr. Ahmed brings public company initiative, governance, agriculture and food industry focus, international business, strategic initiative, risk management and environmental and safety expertise to the Board.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

Tate & Lyle PLC (October 2009 – April 2018)



​ ​ ​ ​ 
 Age

60



Tenure

2



​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Corporate governance and nominating

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

Public Company Governance

CEO

Agriculture and Food Industry

International Business

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management

Environmental & Safety



​  


GRAPHIC











Robert C. Arzbaecher

Robert C. Arzbaecher served as chief executive officer of Actuant Corporation, a diversified manufacturer and marketer of industrial products and systems with operations in more than 30 countries, from 2000 until January 2014 and as interim president and chief executive officer of Actuant from August 2015 until March 2016. He served as a director of Actuant from 2000 until January 2017 and as chairman of the board of Actuant from 2001 until March 2016. From 1992 until 2000, he held various financial positions with Applied Power, Inc., Actuant's predecessor, the most recent of which was chief financial officer. Prior to 1992, Mr. Arzbaecher held various financial positions with Grabill Aerospace, Farley Industries, and Grant Thornton, a public accounting firm. Mr. Arzbaecher is a certified public accountant and he is also a director of Fiduciary Management, Inc. mutual funds.

Qualifications


As the former chairman and chief executive officer of Actuant, Mr. Arzbaecher brings public company governance, international business, strategic initiative, and risk management expertise to the Board. As a certified public accountant who has served as a financial executive, he is an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of SEC rules.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

Actuant Corporation (2000 – Jan. 2017) (Chairman from 2001 – Mar. 2016)



​ ​ ​ ​ 
Age

60



Tenure

14



  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Audit

Corporate governance and nominating (Chair)

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

Public Company Governance

CEO

Accounting and Finance Expertise

International Business

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management



Table of Contents





GRAPHIC​  

 

GRAPHIC











William Davisson

William Davisson served as the chief executive officer of GROWMARK, Inc., a large agricultural cooperative system providing agronomy, energy, facility planning, and logistics products and services, as well as grain marketing and risk management services, in the United States and Canada, from 1998 through 2010. He worked in the GROWMARK system his entire career, from 1970 through 2010, and the positions he held prior to becoming to chief executive officer included chief financial officer and vice president, member services. GROWMARK was an owner of our predecessor company before our initial public offering ("IPO") in August 2005, and GROWMARK remains one of our largest customers. From 1998 to 2005, Mr. Davisson served as a director of our predecessor company and as chairman of its board from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Davisson is a certified public accountant.

Qualifications


As the former chief executive officer and chief financial officer of GROWMARK, Mr. Davisson brings accounting and finance, agriculture industry, and strategic initiative and risk management expertise to the Board. Mr. Davisson has a deep understanding of our business, as demonstrated by his more than 20 year association with our company. Mr. Davisson is a certified public accountant with substantial executive experience in risk management and he is an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of SEC rules.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

None



​ ​ ​ ​ 
Age

72



Tenure

14



  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Audit

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

CEO

Accounting and Finance Expertise

Agriculture Industry

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management


Table of Contents






GRAPHIC​  

 

GRAPHIC











John W. Eaves

John W. Eaves has served as president and chief executive officer of Arch Coal, Inc., a top coal producer for the global steel and power generation industries, since 2012 and has been a member of its board of directors since 2006. He has more than 30 years of experience in the coal industry. During his tenure with Arch Coal, he has held positions of president and chief operating officer; senior vice president of marketing; and vice president of marketing and president of Arch Coal Sales, the company's marketing subsidiary. Mr. Eaves joined Arch Coal in 1987 after serving in various marketing-related positions at Diamond Shamrock Coal Company and Natomas Coal Company. He serves on the boards of the National Association of Manufacturers and the National Mining Association. On January 11, 2016, Arch Coal filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. On October 5, 2016, Arch Coal's reorganization plan became effective and it emerged from Chapter 11.

Qualifications


As the president and chief executive officer and former chief operating and marketing officer of Arch Coal, Mr. Eaves brings substantial energy industry, operations, strategic initiative, and environmental and safety expertise to the Board. Mr. Eaves has extensive experience in risk managementriskmanagement and accounting and finance expertise through his active supervision of those performing financial accounting and reporting at Arch Coal.Coal and he is an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of SEC rules.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

Arch Coal (2006 – present)



​ ​ ​ ​ 
Age

62



Tenure

3



  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Audit

Corporate governance and nominating

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

Public Company Governance

CEO

Operations

Accounting and Finance Expertise

Energy Industry

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management

Environmental & Safety


Table of Contents






GRAPHIC​  

 

GRAPHIC











Stephen A. Furbacher

Stephen A. Furbacher served as president and chief operating officer of Dynegy Inc., a provider of wholesale power, capacity, and ancillary services to utilities, cooperatives, municipalities, and other energy companies, from August 2005 until December 2007. Prior to that, he served as executive vice president of Dynegy's previously owned natural gas liquids business segment, which was engaged in the gathering and processing of natural gas and the fractionation, storage, transportation, and marketing of natural gas liquids, from September 1996 to August 2005. Mr. Furbacher joined Dynegy in May 1996, just prior to Dynegy's acquisition of Chevron's midstream business. Before joining Dynegy, he served as president of Warren Petroleum Company, the natural gas liquids division of Chevron U.S.A. Mr. Furbacher began his career with Chevron in August 1973 and served in positions of increasing responsibility before being named president of Warren Petroleum Company in July 1994. Mr. Furbacher serves as chief executive officer and president of GTBC, LLC, which operates Grand Teton Brewing Company.

Qualifications


Mr. Furbacher brings substantial senior executive leadership, refinery and petro-chemical operations, energy industry, public company governance and strategic initiative expertise to the Board as a result of his leadership positions at Dynegy, Warren Petroleum, and Chevron.

Mr. Furbacher has extensive experience with risk management and environmental and safety matters.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

None



​ ​ ​ ​ 
Age

72



Tenure

12



  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Corporate governance and nominating

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

Public Company Governance

COO

Operations

Energy Industry

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management

Environmental & Safety


Table of Contents






GRAPHIC​  

 

GRAPHIC











Stephen J. Hagge

Stephen J. Hagge served as the president and chief executive officer of AptarGroup, Inc., a leading global supplier of a broad range of innovative dispensing systems for the beauty, personal care, home care, prescription drug, consumer health care, injectables, food and beverage markets with manufacturing facilities in North America, Europe, Asia and Latin America, from 2012 until January 2017 and as special advisor to the chief executive officer from February 2017 to March 2017. He served as chief operating officer of AptarGroup from 2008 to 2011, as chief financial officer of AptarGroup from 1993 to 2011 and as an executive vice president and secretary of AptarGroup from 1993 to 2011. Mr. Hagge has served as a director of AptarGroup from 2001 to 2019 and as a director of Crown Holdings Inc. since 2001.2019. He is also a member of the board of directors of Transcendia Topco Holdings, Inc., a privately held specialty package company, since 2018.

Qualifications


Through his experience as a director, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and chief operating officer of AptarGroup, Mr. Hagge brings substantial public company governance, operations, international business, strategic initiative, and risk management expertise to the Board. Mr. Hagge has served as a financial executive and is an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of SEC rules.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

AptarGroup (2001 – 2019)

Crown Holdings Inc. (2019 – Present)



​ ​ ​ ​ 
Age

68



Tenure

9



  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Audit

Compensation and management development (Chair)

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

Public Company Governance

CEO

Operations

Accounting and Finance Expertise

International Business

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management




GRAPHICJohn D. Johnson served as the president and chief executive officer of CHS Inc. ("CHS"), a Fortune 100 company and leading global agribusiness that is diversified in energy, grains, and foods, from 2000 through 2010. CHS was an owner of our predecessor company before our IPO in August 2005 and remains one of our largest customers. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Johnson served as a director of our predecessor company and as chairman of its board from 2004 to 2005. Mr. Johnson joined Harvest States Cooperative in 1976, and served as president and chief executive officer of Harvest States from 1995 until it merged with Cenex, Inc. to form CHS in 1998. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Johnson served as general manager and president of CHS. Mr. Johnson served as a director of Gold Kist Holdings Inc., which operated a fully integrated chicken production business, from 2004 until its acquisition by Pilgrim's Pride Corp. in 2007.

Qualifications

As the former president and chief executive officer of CHS and its predecessor company, Mr. Johnson brings substantial operations, agriculture industry, energy industry, international business, strategic initiative, risk management, and environmental and safety expertise to the Board. Mr. Johnson has a deep understanding of CF Industries' business, as demonstrated by his 18 year association with our company.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

None


Table of Contents





GRAPHIC​  

 

GRAPHIC











Anne P. Noonan

Anne P. Noonan has served as president and chief executive officer and as a director of OMNOVA Solutions Inc., a global provider of emulsion polymers, specialty chemicals, and engineered surfaces for a variety of commercial, industrial, and residential end uses with manufacturing, technical, and other facilities located in North America, Europe, China, and Thailand, since December 2016. She previously served as OMNOVA's president, performance chemicals, from 2014 until December 2016. Ms. Noonan previously held several positions of increasing responsibility with Chemtura Corporation, a global specialty chemicals company, from 1987 through 2014, including most recently as senior vice president and president of Chemtura's Industrial Engineered Products business and Corporate Development function. She serves on the boards of the American Chemistry Council and the Greater Cleveland Partnership.

Qualifications


As the president and chief executive officer of OMNOVA Solutions and previous executive operating positions at both OMNOVA Solutions and Chemtura Corp., Ms. Noonan brings public company governance, operations, chemical industry, international business, strategic initiative, and environmental and safety expertise to the Board. Ms. Noonan has extensive experience in risk management and accounting and finance expertise through her active supervision of those performing financial accounting and reporting at OMNOVA Solutions.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

OMNOVA Solutions (Dec. 2016 – Present)



​ ​ ​ ​ 
Age

56



Tenure

4



  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Compensation and management development

Corporate governance and nominating

​ ​ ​ ​ 

Qualifications

Public Company Governance

CEO

Operations

Accounting and Finance Expertise

Chemical Industry

International Business

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management

Environmental & Safety


 





GRAPHIC​  

 

GRAPHIC











Michael J. Toelle

Michael J. Toelle is the owner of T & T Farms, a diversified farming company. He has been a member of the board of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, one of the largest insurance and financial services companies in the world, since 2013. He is a former board chairman and longtime board member of CHS. He also served as a board member for Cenex, Inc., before it merged with Harvest States Cooperatives to create CHS in 1998. Mr. Toelle is past chairman of the CHS Foundation and previously served as a director for the Agricultural Council of America and Country Partners Cooperative. He is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Qualifications


As the owner and operator of a major diversified farming company, a director of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. and former chairman and director of CHS, Mr. Toelle brings agricultural industry, operations, strategic initiative, risk management, and environmental and safety expertise to the Board.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

None



​ ​ ​ ​ 
Age

57



Tenure

3



  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Compensation and management development

Corporate governance and nominating

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

Operations

Agriculture Industry

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management

Environmental & Safety


Table of Contents






GRAPHIC​  

 

GRAPHIC











Theresa E. Wagler

Theresa E. Wagler has served as chief financial officer and executive vice president of Steel Dynamics, Inc., one of the largest domestic steel producers and metals recyclers in the United States, since 2007 and 2009, respectively. She also serves as Steel Dynamics' principal accounting officer.officer and also has oversight responsibility for company-wide safety, human resources, business development and strategy, and two operating joint ventures. She has held various positions of increasing responsibility since joining Steel Dynamics in 1998. Prior to joining Steel Dynamics, she served as assistant corporate controller for Fort Wayne National Bank and as a certified public accountant with Ernst & Young LLP.

Qualifications

As the chief financial officer of
With her roles and responsibilities at Steel Dynamics, Ms. Wagler brings substantial public company governance, operations, accounting and finance, strategic initiative, and risk management and environmental and safety expertise to the Board. Ms. Wagler is a certified public accountant and an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of SEC rules.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

None



​ ​ ​ ​ 


Age

49



Tenure

5



  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Audit (Chair)

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

Public Company Governance

CFO

Operations

Accounting and Finance Expertise

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management

Environmental & Safety






​  


GRAPHICGRAPHIC











Celso L. White

Celso L. White served as global chief supply chain officer at Molson Coors Brewing Company, one of the largest global brewers with breweries in the United States, Canada, Europe and India and worldwide distribution, from January 2013 to December 2019. From September 2010 to January 2013, he was vice president of international supply chain at Molson Coors. Prior to joining Molson Coors, he was Pepsi Cola's vice president and general manager of Concentrate Operations, responsible for the Americas and parts of Asia from 2004 to 2010. In January 2020, Mr. White co-founded Igniting Business Growth LLC, a consultancy business. Mr. White serves on the board of Colorado UpLift based in Denver, Colorado and is a member of the Bradley University Board of Trustees.

Qualifications
As the global chief supply chain officer at Molson Coors Brewing Company, Mr. White was responsible for all aspects of the supply chain from grain fields to finished product retailer distribution, including procurement; operations; planning; logistics and distribution; environmental health and safety; engineering; and technical innovation. Mr. White brings operational, agricultural industry, international business, strategic initiative, risk management and environmental and safety expertise to the Board.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

None



​ ​ ​ ​ 


Age

58



 Tenure

2



​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

Compensation and management development

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

Global Chief Supply Chain Officer

Operations

Agriculture Industry

International Business

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management

Environmental & Safety


Table of Contents



​  


GRAPHIC











W. Anthony Will

W. Anthony Will has served as our president and chief executive officer and as a member of the Board since January 2014. He was previously our senior vice president, manufacturing and distribution, from January 2012 to January 2014, our vice president, manufacturing and distribution, from March 2009 to December 2011, and our vice president, corporate development, from April 2007 to March 2009. Mr. Will has also served in the comparable officer positions with Terra Nitrogen GP Inc. ("TNGP") as he has held with CF Industries sincefrom April 2010.2010 to April 2018. TNGP iswas our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary and the sole general partner of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P., a publicly-traded producer of nitrogen fertilizer products. In April 2018, we purchased all of the publicly traded common units of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. Mr. Will served as a director of TNGP from June 2010 until February 2016 and as chairman of the board of TNGP from January 2014 to February 2016. Before joining CF Industries, Mr. Will was a partner at Accenture Ltd., a global management consulting, technology services, and outsourcing company. Earlier in his career, he held positions as vice president, business development at Sears, Roebuck and Company and vice president, strategy and corporate development at Fort James Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Will was a manager with the Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm.

Qualifications


As the president and chief executive officer of CF Industries and with his previous executive operations and corporate development positions, Mr. Will brings public company governance, operations, fertilizer and chemical industry, international business, strategic initiative, and environmental and safety expertise to the Board. Mr. Will has extensive experience in risk management and accounting and finance expertise through his active supervision of those performing those functions at CF Industries.

Other Public Company Directorships (within the past 5 years)

Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. (2010 – Jan. 2017) (Chairman
(Chairman from 2001 – Mar. 2016)



​ ​ ​ ​ 
Age

54



Tenure

6



  
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  CF Committees

None

​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  Qualifications

Public Company Governance

CEO

Operations

Accounting and Finance Expertise

Fertilizer / Chemical Industry

International Business

Strategic Initiatives

Risk Management

Environmental & Safety


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

CF Industries is committed to implementing sound corporate governance practices that enhance the effectiveness of the Board and our management.management and that serve the interests of our shareholders. Our corporate governance and nominating committee periodically reviews corporate governance developments and best practices along with our policies and business strategies. The committee advises the Board and management in an effort to strengthen existing governance practices and develop new policies that make CF Industries a better company. We are proud of the steps we have taken and the progress we have made to further strengthen our corporate governance practices and demonstrate our responsiveness to stockholdershareholder concerns. Highlights of our corporate governance include:

Independent chairman of the Board and separate chief executive officer. Nine of our ten director nominees are considered independent.

In accordance with our corporate governance and nominating committee charter and our corporate governance guidelines, the corporate governance and nominating committee considers diversity in identifying nominees for director. Women comprise 20% of our director nominees.

All of our directors are elected annually.

We have a majority vote standard for the election of directors in uncontested elections.

Eligible stockholders can utilize the proxy access provisions of our bylaws to include their own nominees for director in our proxy materials along with Board-nominated candidates. For further information, see the discussion in Proposal 1 under the heading "Proxy Access."

The Board has adopted a policy whereby, if the Board adopts a stockholder rights plan without prior stockholder approval, the Board will submit the stockholder rights plan to the company's stockholders for ratification, or the stockholder rights plan must expire, within one year of such adoption.

Stockholders representing not less than 25% of our outstanding common stock can call a special meeting of stockholders. At the Annual Meeting, we are asking stockholders to ratify the provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws granting stockholders the ability to call special meetings of stockholders. See Proposal 3 for additional information.

All supermajority voting provisions have been eliminated from our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

The Board has adopted corporate governance guidelines to document its overall management governance philosophy. According to these guidelines, the business and affairs of CF Industries shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board. The Board's goal is to build long-term value for our stockholdersshareholders and assure the vitality of the company for our customers and employees and the other individuals and organizations who depend on us. A copy of our corporate governance guidelines is available to stockholdersshareholders at our corporate website,www.cfindustries.com, or by writing to our corporate secretary at the address of our principal executive offices on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The experience and diversity of our directors has been, and continues to be, critical to our success. Our corporate governance guidelines require that the Board be composed of at least a majority of directors who qualify as independent directors under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE"). Additionally, in accordance with NYSE listing standards, the members of our audit, compensation, and corporate governance and nominating committees must be independent. The Board


Table of Contents

has made an affirmative determination that all eleven of our non-employee directors have no material relationship with CF Industries or any of its subsidiaries (other than being a director and stockholdershareholder of CF Industries) and, accordingly, meet the applicable requirements for "independence" set forth in the NYSE's listing standards.

LEADERSHIP OF THE BOARD

Separate Independent Board Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The Board has determined that the most effective leadership structure is to maintain an independent Board chair role separate from the chief executive officer. In making this determination, the Board takes into account a number of factors, including (1) that separating these positions allows our Board chairman to focus on the Board's role of providing advice to, and independent oversight of, management and (2) the time and effort our chief executive officer needs to devote to the management and operation of CF Industries and the development and implementation of our business strategies. Although our governance documents provide the Board with the flexibility to select the leadership structure in the way that it deems best for CF Industries at any given point in time, it is the Board's intentionBoard intends to continue to maintain an independent Board chair separate from the chief executive officer. In addition, according to our corporate governance guidelines, if the chairman of the Board is not an independent director, our independent directors will designate one of their number to serve


Table of Contents

as a lead independent director. Otherwise, if the chairman of the Board is an independent director, he or she will serve as the lead independent director.

Stephen A. Furbacher has served as our lead independent director since 2010 and as Board chairman since May 2014. Mr. Furbacher was selected by the directors to serve as chairman because of his contributions to the leadership of the Board through his position as our lead independent director prior to becoming chairman.Board. Because Mr. Furbacher is an independent director, he continues to serve as our lead independent director. The lead independent director's duties include (i) coordinating the activities of the independent directors, (ii) coordinating the agenda for and moderating sessions of the independent directors, and (iii) facilitating communications between the other members of the Board. Unless otherwise provided in a short-term succession plan approved by the Board:

in each case, until the Board has the opportunity to consider the situation and take action.

Executive Sessions

At each regularly scheduled meeting, the Board conducts executive sessions, which are discussions that involve only the non-employee directors. Our corporate governance guidelines state that the lead independent director or, in such director's absence, another independent director designated by the lead independent director will preside at the executive sessions of the Board.

Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations and Director Peer Evaluations

Our corporate governance and nominating committee sponsors an annual self-assessment of the Board's performance and the performance of each committee of the Board as well as director peer evaluations. The assessment includes a review of any areas in which the Board or management believes


Table of Contents

the Board can make a better contribution to CF Industries. In addition, the chair of the corporate governance and nominating committee sponsors an annual self-assessment of director skills and experience. The assessment asks each director to rank the importance of various business experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills to our current and future global strategy, business, and governance and to rate the director's competency level in the skills. The results of the assessments are discussed with the full Board and each committee. The corporate governance and nominating committee considers the results of thisthese self-evaluation processprocesses as applicable in assessing and determining the characteristics and critical skills required of prospective candidates for election to the Board and making recommendations to the Board with respect to assignments of Board members to various committees.


Table of Contents Management Development and Succession Planning

Our Board plays an integral oversight role in talent development by recognizing the importance of succession planning for the CEO and other key executives at CF Industries. To assist the Board, the chief executive officer prepares and distributes to the Board an annual report on succession planning for all senior officers of the company with an assessment of senior managers and their potential to succeed the chief executive officer and other senior management positions. In addition, the chief executive officer prepares, on a continuing basis, a short-term succession plan which delineates a temporary delegation of authority to certain officers of the company, if all or a portion of the senior officers should unexpectedly become unable to perform their duties.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board has established three separate standing committees: the audit committee, the compensation and management development committee, and the corporate governance and nominating committee. The Board has adopted written charters for each of these committees and copies of these charters are available to stockholdersshareholders at our corporate website,www.cfindustries.com, or by writing to our corporate secretary at the address of our principal executive offices on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement.

Audit Committee. Our audit committee is a separately designated standing committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The committee currently consists of Theresa E. Wagler (chair), Robert C. Arzbaecher, William Davisson, John W. Eaves, and Stephen J. Hagge, and Robert G. Kuhbach. During 2017, the audit committee members were Theresa E. Wagler (chair from May 2017 through present), Robert C. Arzbaecher, William Davisson, John W. Eaves (effective July 2017), Stephen J. Hagge, and Robert G. Kuhbach (chair from January through May 2017).Hagge. The Board has affirmatively determined that all of the directors who served on the audit committee during 2017 and who presently serve on the committee are independent within the meaning ofunder the corporate governance standards of the NYSE applicable to audit committee members. The Board has also determined all of these directors are "audit committee financial experts," as defined by the SEC. The audit committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility for (1) the integrity of our financial statements and financial reporting process and our systems of internal accounting and financial controls, (2) the performance of our internal audit function, (3) the annual independent integrated audit of our consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, and (4) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including our disclosure controls and procedures. The duties and responsibilities of the audit committee include the engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm and the evaluation of our accounting firm's qualifications, independence, and performance. The audit committee's report to stockholdersshareholders appears elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation and Management Development Committee. Our compensation and management development committee currently consists of Stephen J. Hagge (chair), Stephen A. Furbacher, John D. Johnson, Anne P. Noonan, Edward A. Schmitt, Michael J. Toelle, and Theresa E. Wagler. During 2017, the compensation committee members were Stephen J. Hagge (chair from May 2017 through present), Robert C. Arzbaecher (from January through May 2017), Stephen A. Furbacher, John D. Johnson (chair from January through May 2017), Anne P. Noonan, Edward A. Schmitt, Michael J. Toelle (effective July 2017), and Theresa E. Wagler.Celso L. White. The Board has affirmatively determined that all of the directors who served on the compensation committee during 2017 and who


Table of Contents

presently serve on the committee are independent under the corporate governance standards of the NYSE.NYSE applicable to compensation committee members. The Board has also determined that all of the members of the committee qualify as "non-employee directors," within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and "outside directors," within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code"). The compensation and management development committee oversees our compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including our executive compensation plans, director compensation plans, and incentive-compensation and equity-based plans. In addition, the compensation and management development committee supports the full Board with succession plans for the CEO, while overseeing and reviewing management's development, retention and succession planning for other key executives and senior management. The compensation and management development committee's report to stockholdersshareholders appears elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. Additional information regarding the processes and procedures of the compensation and management development committee in recommending and determining compensation for our directors and executive officers is set forth below under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Role of the Compensation Committee.Analysis."

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Our corporate governance and nominating committee currently consists of Robert C. Arzbaecher (chair), William Davisson,Javed Ahmed, John W. Eaves, Stephen A. Furbacher, John D. Johnson, Robert G. Kuhbach, Anne P. Noonan, Edward A. Schmitt, and Michael J. Toelle. During 2017, the corporate governance and nominating committee members were Robert C. Arzbaecher (effective May 2017 and chair from May 2017 through present), William Davisson, John W. Eaves (effective July 2017), Stephen A. Furbacher, John D. Johnson, Robert G. Kuhbach, Anne P. Noonan, Edward A. Schmitt (chair from January through May 2017), and Michael J. Toelle (effective July 2017). The Board has affirmatively determined that all of the directors who served on the corporate governance and nominating committee during 2017 and who presently serve on the committee are independent under the corporate governance standards of the NYSE. The corporate governance and nominating committee's responsibilities include identifying and recommending to the Board individuals qualified to serve as directors and on committees of the Board; advising the directors with respect to the Board's composition, procedures, and committees; developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles; and overseeing the evaluation of the Board and the president and chief executive officer.


Table of Contents

ATTENDANCE OF DIRECTORS AT MEETINGS

Directors are expected to attend meetings of the Board and the committees on which they serve, as well as our annual meeting of stockholders.shareholders. A director who is unable to attend a meeting (which it is understood will occur on occasion) is expected to notify the chairman of the Board or the chair of the appropriate committee in advance of such meeting.

During 2017,2019, the Board held sixseven meetings, our audit committee held nine meetings, our compensation and management development committee held sevenfive meetings, and our corporate governance and nominating committee held fivefour meetings. AllEach of our directors attended 100%75% or more of the combined total meetings of the full Board and those committees of which they were members, except (i) one director was unable to attend one in-person Board meeting due to jury duty service but did participate by teleconference for a portion of the meeting, (ii) one director was unable to attend one in-person meeting of the board and of each of the two committees on which the directorhe or she served and (iii) one compensation committee member was unable to attend one telephonic compensation committee meeting.during 2019. All twelve of our directors then in office attended the 2017 Annual Meeting,2019 annual meeting, which was held on May 12, 2017.8, 2019.

ROLEBOARD OVERSIGHT OF THE BOARD INSTRATEGY AND RISK OVERSIGHTMANAGEMENT

Shareholders elect the Board to oversee management and to serve shareholders' long-term interests. Management is responsible for delivering on our strategy, creating our culture, establishing accountability, and managing risk. The Board and its committees work closely with management to balance and align strategy, risk, corporate social responsibility, and other areas while considering feedback from shareholders. Essential to the Board's oversight role is a transparent and active dialogue between the Board and its committees, and management. To support that dialogue, the Board and its committees have access to, receive presentations from, and conduct regular meetings with our executive officers, other internal business and function leaders and subject matter experts, as well as external experts and advisors.

Board Oversight of Strategy

One of the Board's primary responsibilities is reviewing and approving the strategy established by management and measuring our ability to execute it successfully. Throughout the year, the Board and its committees provide oversight and guidance to management regarding our strategy, operating plans, and overall performance. While elements of strategy are embedded in every regularly-scheduled meeting of the Board, the Board also dedicates at least one full day meeting each year to focus on our long-term business strategic planning. At all of these reviews, the Board engages with our executive officers and other business leaders regarding business objectives, the competitive landscape, economic trends, and regulatory developments. At meetings occurring throughout the year, the Board also assesses strategic initiatives, our budget and capital allocation plans, and performance for alignment to our strategy.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining systems to assess and manage the company's risk exposure, and the Board provides oversight in connection with those efforts. In fulfilling its risk oversight role, the Board focuses on the adequacy of our risk management process and the effectiveness of our overall risk management system. The goal of this oversight byIn addition, the Board isroutinely assesses policies and procedures in critical areas to ensure that our employees whothe responsibilities and authority delegated to senior management are responsible forappropriate from an operational and risk management (i) adequatelyperspective. The Board also receives regular reports from senior management addressing financial and operational risk exposure, including monthly scorecards and quarterly dashboards that include financial metrics and safety and environmental statistics.

Our management has established an enterprise risk management ("ERM") program that includes an annual assessment process that is designed to identify the material risks that could affect us and the company faces in a timely manner; (ii) implement appropriateachievement of our objectives; to understand, assess, and prioritize those risks; and to


Table of Contents

facilitate the implementation of risk management strategies and processes across the company that are responsive to the company's risk profile, business strategies, and specific material risk exposures; (iii)exposures. The ERM program seeks to integrate consideration of risk and risk management into business decision-making


Table of Contents

throughout the company; and (iv) includecompany, including through the implementation of policies and procedures intended to ensure that adequately transmit necessary information with respect to material risks is transmitted to senior executives and, as appropriate, to the Board or relevant committees. During 2017,

The Board administers its risk oversight function as a whole and through its committees. In accordance with its charter, the audit committee supports the Board reviewedin its oversight of the company's risk management system and process by reviewing and discussing with the key members of management responsible for management of risk the guidelines and policies governing the ERM process, by which management hadthe key risks identified in the material risks to the company's strategic, operating, financial reporting, and compliance objectives,ERM process, as well as the likelihood of occurrence and the potential impact assigned to those risks by management, and the mitigating measuresrisk mitigation strategies in each instance.

Our Board and its committees are actively involved in the oversight of our strategy and processes to identify, assess, and address the risks and opportunities to our company associated with climate change. Management provides the Board regular updates on these issues, including during the discussions at the Board meetings dedicated to reviewing our long-term business strategic plan, and as part of management's review of the enterprise risk management process.

In addition, the audit committee receives regular reports on the efficacy of our information security and technology risks (including cybersecurity) and related policies and procedures from our chief information officer and other members of senior management who are tasked with monitoring cybersecurity risks.

The other standing committees of the Board oversee management of risks relating to their respective areas of responsibility. The compensation and management development committee reviews risks associated with the design and implementation of our compensation plans and arrangements (see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation and Benefits Risk Analysis" below). The nominating and corporate governance committee reviews risks related to our governance structures and processes.

All Board members are invited to attend every committee meeting, and Board members who do not attend a committee meeting receive information about committee activities and deliberations.

CODE OF CORPORATE CONDUCTCulture, Management Development and Succession Planning

The Board has adopted a code of corporate conduct that is applicable to allA core aspect of our directors, officers,culture is our commitment to developing talent and employees. A copyfuture leaders. At CF, leadership is the quality that drives our values and sets us apart. To help foster leadership, the company developed a new set of leadership competencies that provide a common language for how to demonstrate leadership at every level of the code is availableorganization. We invest in extensive assessment, training and professional development opportunities for our employees. We view these types of development opportunities as being a key part of succession planning, allowing us to stockholders at our corporate website, www.cfindustries.com, or by writing to our corporate secretary atgrow a stronger company, today and in the address on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement. We intend to disclose on our corporate website any amendment to any provisionfuture.

The compensation and management development committee of the code that relatesBoard engages with senior management and human resources executives across a broad range of human capital management topics including culture, succession planning and development, compensation, employee recruiting and retention, and diversity and inclusion.


Table of Contents

Our Board plays an integral oversight role in talent development by recognizing the importance of succession planning for the CEO and other key executives at CF Industries. To assist the Board, the chief executive officer prepares and distributes to any elementthe Board an annual report on succession planning for all senior officers of the definitioncompany with an assessment of "code of ethics" enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K undersenior managers and their potential to succeed the Exchange Act, and any waiver from any such provision granted to our principalchief executive officer principal financialand other senior management positions. In addition, the chief executive officer principal accounting officerprepares, on a continuing basis, a short-term succession plan which delineates a temporary delegation of authority to certain officers of the company, if all or controller or persons performing similar functions.a portion of the senior officers should unexpectedly become unable to perform their duties.

STOCKHOLDERBEYOND THE BOARDROOM

On-Site Visits to Nitrogen Manufacturing Facilities

Most Board and committee meetings are held on-site at our headquarters or near other CF facilities. Over the last five years our Board has visited our nitrogen manufacturing facilities in Verdigris, Oklahoma; Yazoo City, Mississippi; Port Neal, Iowa; Donaldsonville, Louisiana; and Ince, United Kingdom. Locating the Board and committee meetings on-site or near our headquarters or manufacturing locations allows our directors to deepen their understanding of the company and interact with on-site employees.

Director Orientation

All new members of the Board participate in the company's new director orientation program led by members of senior management. The new director orientation program enables new members of the Board to quickly become active, knowledgeable and effective Board members. Orientation includes a visit to the company's corporate headquarters for a personal comprehensive briefing by senior management on our business, financial position, strategic plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, compensation practices, corporate governance and key policies and our principal officers and internal and independent auditors as well as the roles and responsibilities of our directors. In addition, within a few months of joining our Board, new directors visit one of our nitrogen manufacturing facilities to see our operations in person and learn about our manufacturing processes.

Continuing Education

All directors are encouraged to participate in outside continuing education programs to increase their knowledge and understanding of the duties and responsibilities of directors and the company, regulatory developments and best practices. The Board materials for every corporate governance and nominating committee meeting include a schedule and summary of upcoming relevant continuing education programs, sponsored by leading universities or other organizations, with any associated expenses to be reimbursed by the company. Directors who have participated in such programs share their lessons and insights with other members of the Board. The company also provides continuing director education through individual speakers who make relevant presentations in connection with in-person Board meetings, for our directors to stay current and knowledgeable about the company's industry, market and overall environment. The company's senior management also monitors pertinent developments in business, corporate governance and issues pertaining to the company and the industries in which it participates and regularly shares articles, reports and current events with directors. The corporate governance and nominating committee reviews the director education process to ensure the continuing education provided remains relevant and helpful.


Table of Contents

Individual Discussions and Mentoring Management

Each year one or more members of the Board participates in our annual leadership conference for mid and senior-level management. This presents another opportunity for our directors to share their advice and experience with management and to engage with high-potential individuals as they grow into greater leadership roles. Additionally, high-potential employees join members of the Board for dinners prior to on-site Board and committee meetings. These dinners are designed to give directors the opportunity to engage with employees directly and afford employees an opportunity to ask questions and get to know our directors.

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

We believe that building positive relationships with our stockholdersshareholders is critical to CF Industries' success. We value the views of, and regularly communicate with, our stockholdersshareholders on a variety of topics, such as our financial performance, corporate governance, executive compensation, corporate responsibility and sustainability, and related matters. As discussed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Shareholder Engagement," we conduct shareholder outreach campaigns in the spring and fall. Management shares the feedback received from stockholdersshareholders with the Board. Our chairman, orour committee chairs, and other members of the Board may also beare available to participate in meetings with stockholdersshareholders as appropriate. Requests for such a meeting are considered on a case-by-case basis. Our engagement activities have resulted in valuable feedback that has contributed to our decision-making with respect to these matters. We welcome your input and feedback and look forward to continued engagement with our stockholders.shareholders.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS

The Board has established a process to receive communications from stockholdersshareholders and other interested parties. StockholdersShareholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of the Board, any Board committee, or any chair of any such committee by mail. To communicate with the Board, any individual director, or any group or committee of directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board or any such individual director or group or committee of directors by either name or title. All such correspondence should be sent c/o the corporate secretary to our principal executive offices at the address on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement.

All communications received as set forth in the preceding paragraph will be opened by the office of our general counsel for the sole purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to one or more of our directors and then forwarded promptly to each addressee. In the case of communications to the Board or any group or committee of directors, the office of the general counsel will distribute copies of the contents to each director who is a member of the Board or of the group or committee to which the envelope or correspondence is addressed.

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY

Corporate responsibility and sustainability are inherent to our values and our "Do It Right" culture and an intrinsic part of our commitment to the communities in which we live and work.

Code of Corporate Conduct

Our commitment to ethical behavior is captured in our code of corporate conduct, which was adopted by our Board. The code is applicable to all of our directors, officers, and employees,


Table of Contents

all of whom must acknowledge receiving and reading the code annually. We provide annual code of corporate conduct and anti-corruption training to all employees.

A copy of our code of corporate conduct is available at our corporate website,www.cfindustries.com, or by writing to our corporate secretary at the address of our principal executive offices on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement. We intend to disclose on our corporate website any amendment to any provision of the code that relates to any element of the definition of "code of ethics" enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, and any waiver from any such provision granted to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions.

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS REPORTPolitical Contributions Report

We prepare a semiannual Political Contributions Report listing CF Industries' political contributions. Each Political Contributions Report is posted on our corporate website,www.cfindustries.com, and presented to the corporate governance and nominating committee. Additionally, the Political Contributions Reports set forth the United States trade associations and other similar non-profit organizations to which the company annually pays dues of $20,000 or more and identify the portion of such dues that is used for advocacy and/or political activities by those associations. The most recent Political Contributions Report and our code of corporate conduct, containing our corporate policies related to political activities and contributions, lobbying and related matters, are currently available on our corporate website.

SUSTAINABILITYCharitable Contributions Report

We also prepare a semiannual Charitable Contributions Report listing CF Industries' charitable contributions that exceed $20,000. Each Charitable Contributions Report is posted on our corporate website,www.cfindustries.com. Most of our philanthropic and social outreach initiatives are locally based. This enables each of our facilities to address the unique needs and opportunities in their respective communities. In addition, the company contributes to organizations that impact global sustainability, including the One Acre Fund, which supports smallholder farmers in Africa. In December 2019, the company announced that it was donating $1 million to the One Acre Fund as part of a multiyear commitment to the organization in support of its tree planting program, which benefits smallholder farmers by, among other things, contributing to farmer income and farm soil health while also counteracting land degradation.

Sustainability

CF Industries is a leader in an industry whose mission is fundamental to human survival: putting food on the world's table. By providing plant nutrients to farmers, we feed the crops that feed the world.world and produce building blocks for a better life. We are proud of the role our company plays in fulfilling this increasingly challenging mission. We also believe our company has an important role to play in addressing some of the most critical challenges of our time. As a company, we'rewe are confronting issues such as energy efficiency, resource use, and economic growth. For example, we have partnered with The Nature Conservatory in Iowa to enhance farmer's knowledge of sustainable agricultural practices. A substantial grant to The Nature Conservatory from us is funding a campaign that aims to educate 90,000 farmers responsible for 23 million acres of crops, while creating a sustainable agriculture blueprint that can be applied to other states. Throughout the campaign, we're working closely with stakeholders including fertilizer manufacturers and retailers, government, academics, agriculture groups and farmers to advance the overall goal of the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: a 45 percent reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus runoff into the state's waters. We prepare an annual sustainability report with information related to our energy efficiency and emissions reduction initiatives, environmental, health and safety programs, charitable contributions, and other items. EachCorporate Sustainability ReportReports, each of which is posted on our corporate website,www.cfindustries.com, and presented to the corporate governance and nominating committee. In response to increased interest from the investment community and our commitment to transparency, we have also published an all-inclusive Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) report and an Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) Supplement that consolidates performance data. In our 2018 GRI report we expanded our disclosure to report on all standards for the first time. In addition, we accelerated the publication date of our sustainability reports so that, beginning in 2020, our sustainability


Table of Contents

reports will be published in tandem with our annual report, to better align the timing of our sustainability reporting with our financial reporting and to further integrate our business and sustainability strategies.

Our most recent Corporate Sustainability Report communicates our performance across fundamental environmental, health and safety, social, and other considerations. Our report includes information regarding our carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent emissions, which we report every year. It also discusses how we estimate that our products actually prevent and reduce more CO2 equivalent emissions than we generate. For example, land use is the leading cause of CO2 emissions in agriculture. Because our products increase yields substantially, farmers need less land to grow the food the world population needs to survive. By increasing crop yields, we help limit the conversion of carbon-sequestering forests into farmland. Our products also reduce greenhouse gas emissions from industrial processes. In addition, our diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) product helps substantially reduce nitrous oxide emissions of heavy-duty trucks and marine vessels while also improving fuel efficiency.

Our most recent Corporate Sustainability Report also discusses our partnership with The Nature Conservatory through which we seek to help improve soil health across the state of Iowa. The program, called 4R Plus, is designed to increase awareness and understanding among Iowa's farmers and crop advisers of two important farming practices: (1) 4R Nutrient Stewardship, and (2) conservation. 4R Nutrient Stewardship refers to the concept of applying the right nutrient source at the right rate, right time, and right place. The "Plus" in 4R Plus refers to a suite of in-field and edge-of-field conservation practices that increase soil resiliency and help to keep nutrients on fields and out of adjacent water bodies. When implemented effectively, 4R Plus practices will not only improve soil health and water quality, but also increase farmers' yields and bottom lines.

To help spread 4R Plus awareness and understanding, CF and The Nature Conservancy developed a range of marketing materials and tools to spread the message as far as possible. Those materials are based on extensive qualitative and quantitative research that showed that the key drivers to increased 4R Plus adoption by farmers moving forward are the economic benefits that come with 4R Plus practices and farmers' desire to leave their land in the best condition for the next generation. More than 50 partners have joined the initiative since its formal launch in 2018, including state commodity groups, agribusinesses, conservation organizations, government agencies, universities and others. In 2019, CF announced a second three-year grant to The Nature Conservancy to grow the 4R plus campaign in Iowa and beyond. By the end of 2019, we had reached 90% of Iowa's farmers with 4R Plus messaging at least seven times.


Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Non-employee directors receive compensation, including fees and reimbursements of expenses, for their service and dedication to our company. We recognize the substantial time and effort required to serve as a director of a large public company like ours. We believe that compensation for non-employee directors should be competitive and should encourage increased ownership of CF Industries stock through the payment of a portion of director compensation in shares of our stock. In order to further align the interests of our directors with the interests of our stockholders,shareholders, our non-employee directors are required to achieve and maintain stock ownership with a market value equal to five times their annual cash retainer.

Our compensation and management development committee is responsible for reviewing director compensation and making recommendations to the Board. The compensation committee reviews the compensation of our non-employee directors annually. In connection with its annual review of the compensation of our non-employee directors, the compensation committee also comparesauthorizes its compensation consultant, Exequity, to work with our human resources department to compare the compensation of our non-employee directors with compensation paid to comparable directors at peer companies and the overall market based on the 2015-20162017-2018 National Association of Corporate Directors survey on director compensation. For more information, see(See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Role of the Compensation Consultant.")

Annual Cash Retainer

Each non-employee director is entitled to an annual cash retainer of $100,000, payable quarterly. We do not pay meeting fees to our directors. The chairman of the Board and the chairchairs of the Board committees receive additional annual cash retainers in the following amounts, payable quarterly:

Chairman of the Board

 $60,000  $80,000 

Audit committee chair

 $15,000  $20,000 

Compensation committee chair

 $10,000 
Compensation and management development committee chair $15,000 

Corporate governance and nominating committee chair

 $10,000  $15,000 

Annual Restricted Stock Grant

Each non-employee director will receive, upon joining the Board, a restricted stock grant with a fair market value of $120,000$130,000 (or, in the case of the chairman of the Board, $200,000)$230,000), rounded to the nearest whole share. Thereafter, each continuing non-employee director will receive an annual restricted stock grant with a fair market value of $120,000$130,000 (or, in the case of the chairman of the Board, $200,000)$230,000), rounded to the nearest whole share, on the date of each annual meeting of the stockholders.shareholders. Assuming continuing service as a non-employee director, all shares of restricted stock will vest on the earlier of (x) the date of the first annual meeting of the stockholdersshareholders following the date of grant or (y) the first anniversary of the date of grant.


Table of Contents

20172019 Total Director Compensation

The following table sets forth cash and non-cash compensation with respect to the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, for our non-employee directors. Mr. Will receives no additional compensation for his service as a director.

Name
 Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash(1)
($)
 Stock
Awards(2)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
 Total
($)
  Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash(1)
($)
 Stock
Awards(2)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
 Total
($)

Javed Ahmed

 100,000 129,997�� 3,726 233,723

Robert C. Arzbaecher

 107,500 120,001 5,325 232,826  115,000 129,997 3,786 248,783

William Davisson

 100,000 120,001 5,325 225,326  100,000 129,997 3,786 233,783

John W. Eaves(4)

 75,000 120,004 2,383 197,387 

John W. Eaves

 100,000 129,997 3,786 233,783

Stephen A. Furbacher

 160,000 199,993 8,876 368,869  180,000 229,994 6,698 416,693

Stephen J. Hagge

 107,500 120,001 5,325 232,826  115,000 129,997 3,786 248,783

John D. Johnson

 102,500 120,001 5,325 227,826 

Robert G. Kuhbach

 103,750 120,001 5,325 229,076 

John D. Johnson(4)

 100,000 129,997 3,786 233,783

Anne P. Noonan

 100,000 120,001 5,325 225,326  100,000 129,997 3,786 233,783

Edward A. Schmitt

 102,500 120,001 5,325 227,826 

Michael J. Toelle(4)

 75,000 120,004 2,383 197,387 

Michael J. Toelle

 100,000 129,997 3,786 233,783

Theresa E. Wagler

 111,250 120,001 5,325 236,576  120,000 129,997 3,786 253,783

Celso L. White

 100,000 129,997 3,559 233,556

(1)
Amounts in this column represent the annual cash retainers that our non-employee directors earned during 2017.2019.

(2)
Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the restricted stock awards that we granted to the non-employee directors during 20172019 pursuant to our 2014 Equity and Incentive Plan. Our assumptions with respect to the FASB ASC Topic 718 valuation of these equity awards are described in the footnotes to our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. Additional information with respect to these restricted stock awards is set forth above under the heading "Annual Restricted Stock Grant." Outstanding unvested restricted stock awards as of December 31, 20172019 were as follows: 4,4813,107 shares for each of directors Ahmed, Arzbaecher, Davisson, Eaves, Hagge, Johnson, Kuhbach, Noonan, SchmittToelle, Wagler and Wagler; 3,971 shares for each of directors EavesWhite and Toelle; and 7,4685,497 shares for Chairman Furbacher.

(3)
Amounts in this column represent dividends on restricted stock.

(4)
Messrs. Eaves and Toelle were elected toJohn D. Johnson will retire from the Board in July 2017effective as of the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting and therefore, their fee amounts reflect the partial year they served on the Board.will not stand for re-election.

Table of Contents

COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP

COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table sets forth information, as of March 19, 2018,27, 2020, concerning the beneficial ownership of each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock. The information in the table and the related notes is based on statements filed by the respective beneficial owners with the SEC pursuant to Sections 13(d) and 13(g) under the Exchange Act.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership(1)
 Percent of Class(2) 

BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055

  19,900,981(3) 8.5%

Capital World Investors
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071

  
20,613,503

(4)
 
8.8

%

FMR LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210

  
22,152,237

(5)
 
9.5

%

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202

  
23,608,334

(6)
 
10.1

%

The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

  
24,709,430

(7)
 
10.6

%
 Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 
Amount and Nature
of
Beneficial
Ownership(1)
Percent of
Class(2)

BlackRock, Inc. 

19,852,411(3)9.3%

55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055

FMR LLC

10,745,617(4)5.0%

245 Summer Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210

State Street Corporation

10,992,910(5)5.1%

One Lincoln Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02211

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. 

22,252,945(6)10.4%

100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202

The Vanguard Group, Inc. 

28,122,586(7)13.2%

100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355


(1)
Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership consists of sole power to vote or direct the vote and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of the shares listed.

(2)
Unless otherwise indicated, percentages calculated based upon common stock outstanding as of March 19, 201827, 2020 and beneficial ownership of common stock as set forth in the statements on Schedule 13G filed by the respective beneficial owners with the SEC.

(3)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 10)12), dated January 24, 2018February 4, 2020 and filed with the SEC on January 29, 2018,February 5, 2020, by BlackRock, Inc. ("BlackRock"). BlackRock reports beneficial ownership of shares by its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including BlackRock Life Limited, BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Capital Management, Inc., BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd., BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Deutschland AG, BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited, BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited, BlackRock (Singapore) Limited, and BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. These BlackRock entities have sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 17,914,21318,138,785 shares of common stock and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 19,900,98119,852,411 shares of common stock.

Table of Contents

(4)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 8), dated February 8, 20186, 2020 and filed with the SEC on February 14, 2018, by Capital World Investors. Capital World Investors has sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 20,608,799 shares of common stock and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of all 20,613,503 shares of common stock. Capital Word Investors disclaimed beneficial ownership pursuant to Rule 13d-4.

(5)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 6), dated February 13, 2018 and filed with the SEC on February 13, 2018,7, 2020, by FMR LLC ("FMR") and Abigail P. Johnson, a Director, the Chairman, and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR. FMR reports beneficial ownership of shares by its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including FIAM LLC, Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Trust Company, Fidelity Management & Research Company, Fidelity Personal Trust Company, FSB FMR Co., Inc., and Strategic Advisers Inc.LLC. These FMR entities have sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 1,836,3092,557,936 shares of common stock and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of all 22,152,23710,745,617 shares of common stock.

(5)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020, by State Street Corporation ("State Street"). State Street reports beneficial ownership of shares by its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including SSGA Funds Management, Inc., State Street Global Advisors Limited (UK), State Street Global Advisors Ltd (Canada), State Street Global Advisors, Australia Limited, State Street Global Advisors (Japan) Co., Ltd, State Street Global Advisors Asia Ltd, State Street Global Advisors Singapore Ltd, State Street Global Advisors GmbH, State Street Global Advisors Ireland Limited, and State Street Global Advisors Trust Company. These State Street entities have shared power to vote or to direct the vote of 9,543,211 shares of common stock and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 10,990,225 shares of common stock.
(6)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 2)4), dated February 14, 2018January 10, 2020 and filed with the SEC on February 14, 2018,January 10, 2020, by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. ("T. Rowe Price"). T. Rowe Price has sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 9,252,8849,836,218 shares of common stock and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 23,572,53422,202,954 shares of common stock.

(7)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 8)10), dated February 7, 201810, 2020 and filed with the SEC on February 8, 2018,11, 2020, by The Vanguard Group, Inc. ("Vanguard"). Vanguard reports beneficial ownership of shares of itself, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary. These Vanguard entities have sole power to vote or to direct the vote of 319,832324,161 shares of common stock, shared power to vote or to direct the vote of 54,76858,717 shares of common stock, sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 24,346,34827,764,634 shares of common stock, and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 363,082357,952 shares of common stock.

Table of Contents

COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information, as of March 19, 2018,27, 2020, concerning the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

 
 Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)  
 
Name of Beneficial Owner
 Shares of
Common Stock
Owned
Directly or
Indirectly(2)
 Shares of
Common Stock
that can be
Acquired within
60 Days(3)
 Total Shares of
Common Stock
 Percent of
Class
 

Robert C. Arzbaecher(4)

  114,139    114,139  * 

William Davisson

  35,059    35,059  * 

John W. Eaves

  3,971    3,971  * 

Stephen A. Furbacher

  50,854    50,854  * 

Stephen J. Hagge

  33,039    33,039  * 

John D. Johnson

  76,419    76,419  * 

Robert G. Kuhbach

  30,184    30,184  * 

Anne P. Noonan

  13,687    13,687  * 

Edward A. Schmitt

  58,704    58,704  * 

Michael J. Toelle

  3,971    3,971  * 

Theresa E. Wagler

  13,099    13,099  * 

W. Anthony Will(5)

  167,969  864,970  1,032,939  * 

Dennis P. Kelleher

  32,856  339,111  371,967  * 

Douglas C. Barnard(5)

  51,173  350,272  401,445  * 

Christopher D. Bohn

  25,579  162,684  188,263  * 

Bert A. Frost

  37,550  377,139  414,689  * 

All directors and executive officers as a group (21 persons)

  823,188  2,473,163  3,296,351  1%

 
 Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership(1)
  
 Name of Beneficial Owner Shares of
Common Stock
Owned
Directly or
Indirectly(2)
 Shares of
Common Stock
that can be
Acquired within
60 Days(3)
 Total Shares of
Common Stock
 Percent
of
Class

Javed Ahmed

  6,206    6,206  *

Robert C. Arzbaecher(4)

  110,705    110,705  *

William Davisson

  41,465    41,465  *

John W. Eaves

  10,377    10,377  *

Stephen A. Furbacher

  49,187    49,187  *

Stephen J. Hagge

  39,445    39,445  *

John D. Johnson

  82,825    82,825  *

Anne P. Noonan

  20,093    20,093  *

Michael J. Toelle

  10,377    10,377  *

Theresa E. Wagler

  19,505    19,505  *

Celso L. White

  5,650    5,650  *

W. Anthony Will(5)

  358,877  1,126,095  1,484,972  *

Christopher D. Bohn

  48,830  216,295  265,125  *

Douglas C. Barnard(5)

  80,491  298,760  379,251  *

Bert A. Frost

  71,206  372,315  443,521  *

Susan L. Menzel

  3,486    3,486  *

Dennis P. Kelleher

  23,683  395,105  418,788  *

All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)**

  1,026,379  2,325,232  3,351,611  2%

*
Less than 1%

**
This row shows ownership by our current directors and executive officers and therefore excludes any shares owned by Mr. Kelleher.
(1)
Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership consists of sole power to vote or direct the vote and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of the shares listed, either individually or jointly or in common with the individual's spouse, subject to community property laws where applicable.

(2)
The shares indicated include 4,4813,107 shares of restricted stock for each of directors Ahmed, Arzbaecher, Davisson, Eaves, Hagge, Johnson, Kuhbach, Noonan, SchmittToelle, Wagler and Wagler; 3,971White and 5,497 shares of restricted stock for each of directors Eaves and Toelle; and 7,468 shares of restricted stock for Chairman Furbacher, in each case granted under our 2014 Equity and Incentive Plan, that have not yet vested. These shares of restricted stock can be voted during the vesting period. The table does not include restricted stock units or performance vesting restricted stock units granted to our executive officers under our 2014 Equity and Incentive Plan, as these awards cannot be voted during the vesting period.

(3)
The shares indicated in this column represent shares underlying stock options granted under our 2005 Equityan equity and Incentive Plan, our 2009 Equity and Incentive Plan or our 2014 Equity and Incentive Planincentive plan that have already vested or that will vest within 60 days. The shares underlying these stock options cannot be voted.

Table of Contents

(4)
The shares indicated include 18,565 shares held by the Arzbaecher Family Foundation and 275 shares held by Mr. Arzbaecher's children, for which Mr. Arzbaecher disclaims beneficial ownership.

(5)
Messrs. Will and Barnard each also hold, respectively, 16,75429,504 and 13,369 additional "phantom" shares as a deemed investment under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan (a non-qualified benefits restoration and deferred compensation plan). These phantom shares cannot be voted.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE, and to furnish us with copies of the reports. Specific due dates for these reports have been established and we are required to report in this Proxy Statement any failure by directors, officers, and ten percent holders to file such reports on a timely basis. Based on our review of such reports and written representations from our directors and officers, we believe that all such filing requirements were timely met during 2017, with the exception of one Form 4 for Mr. Furbacher that was filed one day late with respect to a single transaction involving the sale of shares due to a delay in receipt of broker information as a result of the Thanksgiving holiday.


Table of Contents

POLICY REGARDING RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

We recognize that transactions with related persons can present potential or actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance that our decisions are based on considerations other than the best interests of the company and its stockholders.shareholders. Accordingly, as a general matter, it is our preference to avoid such transactions.

Nevertheless, we recognize that there are situations where related person transactions may be in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the company and its stockholders,shareholders, including but not limited to situations where we may obtain products or services of a nature, quantity, or quality, or on other terms, that are not readily available from alternative sources, or when we provide products or services to related persons on an arm's length basis on terms comparable to those provided to unrelated third parties or on terms comparable to those provided to employees generally.

In order to deal with the potential conflicts inherent in such transactions, our audit committee has adopted a written policy regarding related person transactions. For the purposes of this policy, a "related person transaction" is a transaction, arrangement, or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships) in which the company was, is, or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related person had, has, or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than (a) transactions where the rates or charges involved in the transaction are determined by competitive bids, or the transaction involves the rendering of services as a common or contract carrier, or public utility, at rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority; (b) transactions involving services as a bank depositary of funds, transfer agent, registrar, or trustee under a trust indenture, or similar services; (c) transactions in which the interest of the related person derives solely from his or her service as a director of another entity that is a party to the transaction; or (d) transactions in which the interest of the related person derives solely from his or her ownership of less than 10% of the equity interest in another entity (other than a general partnership interest) which is a party to the transaction.

In addition, transactions involving the purchase of products or services (other than personal or professional services) from an entity for which a director of the company or an immediate family member of a director serves as an executive officer shall not be considered to involve a material interest on the part of such director (and therefore shall not be considered related person transactions) if (i) the director did not participate in the decision on the part of the company to enter into such transactions, (ii) the transactions are made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for transactions with other unrelated third parties, and (iii) the amount paid in all transactions with any such entity in a twelve-month period is less than the greater of $500,000 or 1% of such entity's consolidated gross revenues for the most recently completed fiscal year for which data is publicly available.

For purposes of the policy, a "related person" means:

any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of our last fiscal year was, a director or executive officer of the company or a nominee to become a director of the company;

any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities;

Table of Contents

any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons; and

any firm, corporation, or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest.

Table of Contents

Except as described below with respect to certain commercial transactions in the ordinary course of business, any proposed transaction with a related person shall be consummated or amended only if the following steps are taken:

The general counsel will assess whether the proposed transaction is a related person transaction for purposes of this policy.

If the general counsel determines that the proposed transaction is a related person transaction, the proposed transaction shall be submitted to the audit committee for consideration at the next committee meeting or, in those instances in which the general counsel, in consultation with the chief executive officer or the chief financial officer, determines that it is not practicable or desirable for us to wait until the next committee meeting, to the chair of the audit committee (who has been delegated authority to act between committee meetings).

The audit committee, or where submitted to the chair of the committee, the chair, shall consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances available to the committee or the chair, including (if applicable) but not limited to: (i) the benefits to the company; (ii) the impact on a director's independence in the event the related person is a director, an immediate family member of a director, or an entity in which a director is a partner, stockholder,shareholder, or executive officer; (iii) the availability of other suppliers or customers for comparable products or services; (iv) the terms of the transaction; and (v) the terms available to unrelated third parties or to employees generally.

The audit committee (or the audit committee chair) shall approve only those related person transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the company and its stockholders,shareholders, as the committee (or the audit committee chair) determines in good faith.

The audit committee or the audit committee chair, as applicable, shall convey the decision to the general counsel, who shall convey the decision to the appropriate persons within the company.

At the audit committee's first meeting of each fiscal year, the committee shall review any previously approved related person transactions that remain ongoing and have a remaining term of more than six months or remaining amounts payable to or receivable from the company of more than $120,000. Based on all relevant facts and circumstances, taking into consideration the company's contractual obligations, the committee shall determine if it is in the best interests of the company and its stockholdersshareholders to continue, modify, or terminate the related person transaction.

FMR and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, "Fidelity") own in the aggregate more than 5% of our outstanding common stock and, therefore, are considered related persons under our policy regarding related person transactions. We have agreements in place for Fidelity to provide administrative and trustee services for the company's 401(k) and deferred compensation plans. During 2017,2019, Fidelity earned approximately $123,000$187,000 from us and approximately $81,000$63,000 from plan participants for these services. Beginning in 2020, Fidelity will also provide administrative and trustee services for the company's health savings accounts (HSAs). At its first meeting in 2018,2020, the audit committee reviewed and approved the transactions with, and ongoing administrative services from, Fidelity in accordance with our policy.

No member of the audit committee shall participate in any review, consideration, or approval of any related person transaction with respect to which such member or any of his or her immediate family members is the related person.

Sales of our products and services to related persons in the ordinary course of business, at prices and on terms consistent with those offered to similarly situated customers in our industry in transactions between unaffiliated parties will generally not be subject to the approval procedures described above; provided, however, that any (i) modification or amendment of a multi-year supply contract or (ii) entry into, modification, or amendment of a similar long-term supply contract with any related person will be subject to the same procedures under this policy as are applicable to any other related person transactions.


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ("SAY ON PAY")

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, our stockholdersshareholders are entitled to an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) beginning on page 3442 and the Executive Compensation tables and accompanying narrative discussion beginning on page 64.79. This proposal is commonly referred to as a "Say on Pay" proposal.

The Board and the compensation and management development committee believe that the compensation of the named executive officers named in this Proxy Statement is appropriate for the company and in the best interests of our stockholders.shareholders over the long term. As discussed in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A beginning on page 34,42, our compensation programs are intended to (i) to:

As discussed in our CD&A under the heading "Executive Summary - Shareholder Engagement," we conducted extensive shareholder outreach both before and after our 2019 annual meeting. In these conversations, the overwhelming majority of shareholders supported the design of our ongoing compensation program. We have instituted stock ownership guidelines and an incentive compensation "clawback" policy to encourage appropriate levels of risk taking by our management. Wewill continue to provide for significant levels of "at risk" performance-based compensation, which further aligns executive and stockholder interests. For example, commencing in 2014, we began granting 20% of named executive officers' annual long-term incentive equity awards as performance vesting restricted stock units ("PRSUs"). In order to further align pay delivery with long-term performance and to reflect trends in executive compensation generally, beginning with 2018 grants for named executive officers, the compensation committee increased the percentage of the total long-term incentive award value allocated to PRSUs to 60%, increased the percentage allocated to time-vesting restricted stock units ("RSUs") to 40% and eliminated stock option awards. We regularly review (along with outside compensation consultants) our incentiveexecutive compensation programs to ensure compatibilityalignment with our compensation philosophy. philosophy, and we are committed to continuing our dialogue with shareholders so that we can be proactive in responding to emerging industry trends and be responsive to shareholder dialogue.

Accordingly, we are asking you to vote FOR the adoption of the following resolution:

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the company. Although the vote is non-binding, the Board and the compensation and management development committee value the opinions of our stockholdersshareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.

We currently hold our advisory "Say on Pay" proposal every year. Therefore, the next advisory "Say on Pay" proposal wouldwill be held at our 20192021 annual meeting. StockholdersShareholders will have an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the frequency of "Say on Pay" proposals at least every six years. We currently expect that the next advisory vote on the frequency of the "Say on Pay" proposals will occur at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.shareholders.

BOARD RECOMMENDATIONBoard Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the Say on Pay proposal.


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below is certain biographical information for our executive officers other than Mr. Will (whose biographical information appears above under the heading "Director Nominee Biographies"). Each of our executive officers, hasother than Mr. Hopkins, also served in the comparable officer positions with TNGPTerra Nitrogen GP Inc. ("TNGP") as he or she has held with CF Industries sincefrom April 2010 other than Mr. Hopkins.until April 2018. TNGP was our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary and the sole general partner of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P., a publicly-traded producer of nitrogen fertilizer products. In April 2018, we purchased all of the publicly traded common units of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. The ages of our executive officers are as of March 29, 2018.April 8, 2020.

Douglas C. Barnard (age 59)61) has served as our senior vice president, general counsel, and secretary since January 2012 and was previously our vice president, general counsel, and secretary from January 2004 to December 2011. Mr. Barnard has served as a director of TNGP sincefrom June 2010 to April 2018 and as chairman of the board of TNGP sincefrom February 2016.2016 to April 2018. Prior to joining CF Industries in January 2004, Mr. Barnard had been an executive vice president and general counsel of Bcom3 Group, Inc., an advertising and marketing communication services group. Earlier in his career Mr. Barnard was a partner in the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis LLP and, prior to that, awas vice president, general counsel, and secretary of LifeStyle Furnishings International Ltd., a manufacturer and distributor of residential furniture and decorative fabrics. He holds a B.S. degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ("M.I.T"), a J.D. degree from the University of Minnesota, and an M.B.A. degree from the University of Chicago. Mr. Barnard has also taught as a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, and serves as a member of the M.I.T Corporation Development Committee.

Christopher D. Bohn (age 50)52) has served as our senior vice president and chief financial officer since September 2019. He was previously our senior vice president, manufacturing and distribution, sincefrom May 2016. He was previously2016 to September 2019, our senior vice president, manufacturing, from January 2016 to May 2016, our senior vice president, supply chain, from January 2015 to December 2015, our vice president, supply chain, from January 2014 to December 2014, our vice president, corporate planning, from October 2010 to January 2014 and our director, corporate planning and analysis, from September 2009 to October 2010. Mr. Bohn has also served as a director of TNGP sincefrom February 2016.2016 to April 2018. Prior to joining CF Industries, Mr. Bohn served as chief financial officer for Hess Print Solutions from August 2007 to September 2009. Earlier in his career, Mr. Bohn was vice president global financial planning and analysis for Merisant Worldwide, Inc. He holds a B.S. degree in finance from Indiana University and an M.M. degree (M.B.A.) from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.

Linda M. Dempsey (age 56) has served as our vice president, public affairs, since March 2020. Prior to joining CF Industries, Ms. Dempsey served as vice president, international economic affairs, for the National Association of Manufacturers from September 2012 to February 2020 where she represented the manufacturing sector on international trade, investment, intellectual property and regulatory policies, legislation and agreements. Prior to the National Association of Manufacturers, Ms. Dempsey served as vice president for Emergency Committee for American Trade from December 2000 to August 2012. Ms. Dempsey holds a B.A. in political science from The Pennsylvania State University and a J.D. degree from Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley.

Bert A. Frost (age 53)55) has served as our senior vice president, sales, market development, and supply chain, since May 2016. He was previously our senior vice president, sales, distribution, and market development, from May 2014 to May 2016, our senior vice president, sales and


Table of Contents

market development, from January 2012 to May 2014, and our vice president, sales and market development, from January 2009 to December 2011. Before joining CF Industries in November 2008, Mr. Frost spent over 13 years with Archer Daniels Midland Company, where he served most recently as Managing Director—International Fertilizer/Inputs from June 2008 to November 2008 and Director—Fertilizer, Logistics and Ports Divisions, ADM—Brazil from April 2000 to June 2008. Earlier in his career, Mr. Frost held positions of increasing responsibility at Archer Daniels Midland and Koch Industries, Inc. He holds a B.S. degree from Kansas State University and he is a graduate of the Harvard Business School's Advanced Management Program.

Adam Hall (age 43) has served as our vice president, corporate development, since June 2013. Before joining CF Industries, Mr. Hall spent 4 years with Bunge Limited, where he served as executive director, corporate strategy and development, from August 2010 to May 2013, where he led global strategy, mergers and acquisitions and the development of new growth initiatives, and director of global strategy and business development, sugar and bioenergy, from August 2009 to August 2010. Prior to his most recent role with Bunge, he worked in a number of countries in positions with several international companies, including, as a manager at Bain & Company, a global management consulting firm, from January 2008 to August 2009, and as a consultant at LEK Consulting, a global strategy consulting firm, from February 1999 to May 2002. Mr. Hall began his career as a corporate attorney with the law firm


Table of Contents

of Clayton Utz in Perth, Australia. He earned undergraduate degrees in law and commerce from the University of Western Australia and an M.B.A. degree from Harvard Business School.

Richard A. Hoker (age 53)55) has served as our vice president and corporate controller since November 2007. Mr. Hoker has also served as a director of TNGP sincefrom January 2014 to April 2018 and previously served as a director of TNGP from September 2010 to August 2011. Before joining CF Industries, Mr. Hoker spent over 11 years with Sara Lee Corporation, where he served most recently as vice president and controller from January 2007 to November 2007 and principal accounting officer from July 2007 to November 2007. Prior to being named controller, Mr. Hoker held other financial management positions of increasing responsibility at Sara Lee. Prior to joining Sara Lee, Mr. Hoker was a member of the financial advisory services consulting group at Coopers & Lybrand LLP in Chicago (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) and previously led teams in the firm's audit practice. Mr. Hoker holds a B.S. degree in accounting from DePaul University and an M.B.A. degree in finance and accounting from the University of Chicago. He is a certified public accountant.

David P. Hopkins (age 61)63) has served as our managing director, CF Fertilisers UK, since October 2015. He was previously our director, sales, from July 2010 to October 2015. Mr. Hopkins was director of sales for Terra Industries, which was acquired by CF Industries, from September 2006 to July 2010 and director of industrial sales at Terra Nitrogen, UK from January 1999 to September 2006. Mr. Hopkins has a degree in Agriculture from Reading University and a Diploma in Company Direction from the Institute of Directors in London.

Dennis P. KelleherAshraf K. Malik (age 53)54) has served as our senior vice president, manufacturing and chief financial officerdistribution, since August 2011. Mr. Kelleher has also served as a director of TNGP since August 2011. BeforeSeptember 2019. He was previously our Vice President, Site Operations, from January 2012 to September 2019. Prior to joining CF Industries, Mr. KelleherMalik served as vice president, portfolio and strategydirector of manufacturing for BP plc's upstream business. FromGrowHow UK Ltd from 2007 to 2010, Mr. Kelleher served as chief financial officer for Pan American Energy LLC. From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Kelleher served as vice president, planning and performance management for BP plc's upstream business. Mr. Kelleher was employed as a senior accountant at Arthur Andersen & Co. early2012. Earlier in his career. Hecareer, Mr. Malik held positions of increasing responsibility in engineering and plant operations management at Terra Industries Inc. and ICI Plc. Mr. Malik holds a B.S.BSc degree in accountancyengineering from theCity, University of Illinois and an M.M. degree (M.B.A.) from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University. He is a certified public accountant.London.

Susan L. Menzel (age 52)54) has served as our senior vice president, human resources, since October 2017. Prior to joining CF Industries, Ms. Menzel served as executive vice president, human resources, for CNO Financial Group, Inc. from May 2005 to SeptemberOctober 2017. Prior to CNO Financial Group, she served as senior vice president, human resources for APAC Customer Services, Inc., and in roles of increasing responsibility for Sears, Roebuck & Company and Montgomery Ward, Inc. Ms. Menzel holds a bachelor's degree in business administration and economics from Augustana College.

Rosemary O'Brien (age 66) has served as our vice president, public affairs, since 1984, following key management roles in CF Industries' public affairs area. Ms. O'Brien joined the company in 1978, following service with the National Council of Farmer Cooperatives. She holds a B.A. degree in Education/History from the University of New Hampshire and an M.B.A. from American University.


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis discussion provides you with a detailed description of our compensation program for our named executive officers.officers (NEOs) for 2019. It also provides an overview of our compensation philosophy and our policies and programs, which are designed to achieve our compensation objectives.

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our NEOs for 2019 were:

Name

Title
W. Anthony WillPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Christopher D. BohnSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Douglas C. BarnardSenior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
Bert A. FrostSenior Vice President, Sales, Market Development, and Supply Chain
Susan L. MenzelSenior Vice President, Human Resources
Dennis P. KelleherFormer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


TABLE OF CONTENTS

OVERVIEW OF OUR BUSINESS AND STRATEGY

43

Business Overview

43

Corporate Strategy

43

2019 Performance Highlights

47

COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

50

Compensation Program Highlights

50

2019 Target Total Compensation

51

Shareholder Engagement

52

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS: IN DETAIL

54

Compensation Philosophy

54

Key Elements of NEO Compensation Program

55

The Compensation Process

57

Review and Approval of 2019 Cash Compensation

59

Review and Approval of 2019 Long-Term Incentives

65

2020 Compensation Actions

71

Change of Control, Severance, and Retirement Benefits

72

Use of Industry Reference Group

74

Other Compensation Governance Practices and Considerations

75

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYOVERVIEW OF OUR BUSINESS AND STRATEGY

The Compensation Committee

The compensation committee oversees our compensation and employee benefit plans and practices. The committee is composed of seven independent non-employee directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. For more information on the compensation committee, please see "Corporate Governance—Committees of the Board—Compensation Committee" on page 19.

CF Industries Named Executive Officers

Our named executive officers for 2017 were:

W. Anthony Will, President and Chief Executive Officer, Business Overview

Dennis P. Kelleher, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,

Douglas C. Barnard, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary,

Christopher D. Bohn, Senior Vice President, Manufacturing and Distribution, and

Bert A. Frost, Senior Vice President, Sales, Market Development, and Supply Chain.

For the biographies of our named executive officers and our other executive officers, please see "Executive Officers" on page 32.

Our Business

CF Industries is a leading global fertilizer and chemical company with outstanding operational capabilities and a highly cost advantagedcost-advantaged production and distribution platform. Our 3,000 employees operate world-class manufacturing complexes in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. Our customers include both agricultural and industrial users of our products. Our principal nitrogen products are ammonia, granular urea, urea ammonium nitrate solution, and ammonium nitrate. We also manufacture diesel exhaust fluid, urea liquor, nitric acid, and aqua ammonia, which are sold primarily to industrial customers, and compound fertilizer products, which are solid granular fertilizer products for which the nutrient content is a combination of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. We serve our customers in North America through an unparalleled production, storage, transportation and distribution network. We also reach a global customer base with exports from our Donaldsonville, Louisiana, plant, the world's largest and most flexible nitrogen complex. Additionally, we move product to international destinations from our Verdigris, Oklahoma, facility, our Yazoo City, Mississippi, facility, our Billingham and Ince facilities in the United Kingdom, and from a joint venture ammonia facility in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago in which we own a 50 percent interest.

For more information on our business, see "Item 1.—Business" —Business" and "Item 7.—Management's —Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our 20172019 Annual Report.

Corporate Strategy

Our vision, given the cyclical nature of our business, is to deliver superior shareholder returns over the cycle. Our strategy, in support of our vision, is built upon a foundation of distinct core capabilities and core values that we live each and every day. We leverage our capabilities to drive business results that create long-term value for our shareholders.

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

ExecutiveRoadmap for Sustainable, Profitable Growth through the cycle

We are well positioned to seize opportunities and meet challenges through the cycle because of our unique combination of enduring structural and operational advantages.

Consistent Demand Growth

Nitrogen demand growth driven by:

population growth and increased protein consumption per capita for agricultural applications

global GDP plus growth in emissions abatement for industrial applications

Tightening Global Supply and Demand Balance

Net new nitrogen capacity growth (new construction minus capacity closures) is below projected global demand growth for the foreseeable future (approximately four years based on time required to build new capacity) tightening the global supply and demand balance

Advantaged Position on Global Cost Curve

We are on the low end of the global cost curve due to our access to low-cost and plentiful North American natural gas

Global price driven by marginal producers tied to higher-priced liquefied natural gas, oil-linked natural gas and Chinese anthracite coal

Primarily Operate in Import-Dependent Region

North America is dependent on nitrogen imports to meet demand

Price is set by the last imported ton bid into the region

Our manufacturing and distribution network, along with our logistics capabilities, allow us to capture the significant margin between our cost and that of the global high-cost producer (including logistics to move products into consumption region)

Inputs, Manufacturing and Select Product Overview

Modern nitrogen production begins with the production of ammonia through the Haber-Bosch chemical process. Ammonia is the most concentrated nitrogen fertilizer product as it contains 82% nitrogen and is the "basic" nitrogen product that we upgrade into other nitrogen products such as granular urea, urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN), ammonium nitrate (AN), nitric acid and diesel exhaust fluid (DEF). We produce ammonia at all of our nitrogen manufacturing complexes using natural gas as the feedstock.

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

Growth and Superior Utilization of Capacity Demonstrate Significant Operational Advantage

Our corporate strategy is to leverage our core capabilities to optimize and grow the world's most advantaged nitrogen and chemicals platform to serve customers, creating long-term shareholder value. Beginning in 2012, the company underwent a major capital expansion program, adding capacity at two of our facilities. Both projects began ammonia production in the second half of 2016. In total, the two expansions have increased our nitrogen production capacity by approximately 25%. In addition, during 2015, we acquired the 50% equity interest in our UK facilities not previously owned by us, and during 2018, we invested in our production capacity by exercising our right to purchase all of the publicly traded common units of Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. As a result of these investments, we have grown our gross ammonia capacity by over 33% over the past five years.

Our superior capacity utilization compared to North American peers demonstrates the significant operational advantage we enjoy as a result of our exceptional process engineering, plant operations and maintenance capabilities.


North America Ammonia Percent Capacity Utilization(1)

GRAPHIC


(1)
Data taken from the December 20, 2019 CRU Ammonia Database

(2)CF represents CF historical North American production and CRU's capacity estimates for CF

(3)North America Excl. CF is calculated by removing CF's annual reported production and capacity from the CRU data for all North American ammonia production peer group

(4)~1.1 million tons represents the difference between CF's actual trailing 5 year average ammonia production of 8.8 million tons at 96% of capacity utilization and the 7.7 million tons CF's would have produced if operated at the 84% CRU North American benchmark excluding CF

Note:CRU North American peer group includes AdvanSix, Austin Powder (US Nitrogen), BASF & Yara International, Carbonair, CF Industries, Chevron, CVR Partners, Dakota Gasification Co, Dyno Nobel, Fortigen, Incitec Pivot, Koch Industries, LSB Industries, LSB Industries/Cherokee Nitrogen, Mississippi Power, Mosiac, Nutrien,


Table of Contents

Financial Results are Impacted by Highly Cyclical Commodity Prices

Our financial results are significantly impacted by the pronounced effects of highly volatile commodity prices for fertilizer products as well as natural gas, which is our principal feedstock. In 2015 and 2016, nitrogen product prices were lower and stayed at depressed levels longer than expected. Product prices remained volatile throughout 2017, and the year ended with a meaningful decline in the pricing environment. As a result, our financial performance and corresponding incentive compensation programs were negatively impacted during 2015, 2016, and 2017. During 2018, higher energy costs in Asia and Europe, along with continued enforcement of environmental regulations in China, resulted in lower nitrogen production, tightening supply and demand conditions. In addition, outages at several producers also impacted the nitrogen supply and demand balance. These factors collectively drove global nitrogen prices higher in 2018 more rapidly than anticipated, which combined with lower North American natural gas costs and efficient production by us contributed to stronger than projected financial results for the year and corresponding above-target payout for our annual incentive program. Going into 2019, we expected industry fundamentals to continue to be supportive of global nitrogen prices in the first half of the year.

Gulf Urea Barge Historical Price Volatility
Annual Pricing vs. 10-Year Average1

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

2019 Performance Highlights

Safety Is Our Priority

For CF, safety is more than just a requirement – it is a point of pride and ingrained in our corporate culture and values. We believe that focusing on leading indicators, such as the behavioral safety practices we have incorporated into our annual incentive plan to drive and measure activities that prevent and control safety incidents, results in our industry-leading safety record. During 2019, we set an important company record with our trailing 12 month recordable injury rate of 0.48 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 – the lowest year-end rate we have ever achieved as a company. Set forth below is our annual total recordable injury count, recordable incident rate, and lost time incident rate from 2011 through 2019. In addition to these metrics shown below, we also achieved our lowest DART (days away restricted or transferred) incident rate of 0.21 injuries per 200,000 work hours in 2019.


All Facilities – Annual Injuries and Injury Rates

12-month Injury Rate and Total Injury Count; Through December for Current Year

GRAPHIC

Rates = Number of injuries per 200,000 work hours


Table of Contents

Operating Results

Net Earnings
Attributable to
Common Stockholders
Earnings Per
Diluted Share
EBITDA(1)Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities
$493 Million$2.23$1.6 Billion$1.5 Billion

Annual Incentive Plan Performance Metrics

Adjusted EBITDA(2)Behavioral Safety
Gate Threshold
Gross Ammonia
Production
$1.6 BillionAchieved 98.7%10.2 Million Tons
Target: $1.4 BillionThreshold:³95%(3)Target: 10.0 Million Tons

The compensation and management development committee considers the previous year's financial performance, market trends and the company's annual business plan when setting goals and targets for our incentive compensation programs at the end of each calendar year. Management prepares the company's annual business plan and reviews it in detail with the Board. Management prepares the annual business plan through a rigorous process utilizing a combination of factors, including management's view of current industry conditions, recent historical performance, internal forecasts, as well as external public market indicators.

Actual results in 2019 exceeded the company's forecasts as product prices improved more than anticipated – contributing to higher revenue and margins. During 2019, we also exceeded our production goals in part due to our best-in-class operational capabilities that enable us to produce more product than other comparable manufacturers. At the same time, the cost of our principal feedstock, natural gas, declined compared to the prior year and much more than the market expectations reflected in forward market curves when setting our business plan. This combination of a more advantageous pricing environment, lower natural gas cost, and efficient production contributed to the above-target financial results, and therefore an above-target payout for the annual incentive program.

Additionally, the company continued to deliver against its strategic priorities and create long-term shareholder value.

SafetyAs of December 31, 2019, the company's 12-month rolling average recordable incident rate was 0.48 incidents per 200,000 work hours – an industry leading result
Operational ExcellenceLong-term asset utilization-and-production is approximately 12 percent higher than the average utilization rate of our North American competitors
EfficiencySG&A costs as a percent of sales remain among the lowest in both the chemicals and fertilizer industries
Return to ShareholdersReturned $602 million to shareholders through $337 million in share repurchases and $265 million in dividend payments
Reduced Debt and Fixed ChargesDuring 2019, we retired $750 million of outstanding indebtedness, reducing annual cash interest expense in 2020 by $44 million compared to 2019

(1)             EBITDA is defined as net earnings attributable to common stockholders plus interest expense-net, income taxes and depreciation and amortization. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

(2)             See "– Compensation Discussion and Analysis: In Detail – Key Elements of NEO Compensation Program – Our Metrics Defined" for the definition of Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of our annual incentive plan.

(3)             The Secondary Metric, Tons of Ammonia Produced, has a behavioral safety gate threshold. If at least 95% of the aggregated safety grades of all employees at manufacturing sites were a "B" or better for the year, the safety performance gating requirement would be achieved. If the safety performance gating requirement was not achieved, there would be no payout under the Secondary Metric.


Table of Contents

Total Shareholder Return

We firmly believe that, due to the cyclical nature of the commodity chemical industry in which we operate, it is important to view performance over a longer time horizon than just one year. Our execution of initiatives aligned with our strategy helped us achieve our vision – delivering superior shareholder returns over the cycle. The following table shows the cumulative total shareholder return, assuming the reinvestment of dividends, for our common stock and a peer group index for the 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10-year periods ended December 31, 2019.


Total Shareholder Return (TSR)

GRAPHIC

Each of the peer group companies was a publicly traded manufacturer of agricultural chemical fertilizers. The companies comprising the peer group are:

Agrium,  Inc.*

The Mosaic Company

LSB Industries,  Inc.

Incitec Pivot Limited

OCI N.V.**

Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc.*

Nutrien Ltd.*

CVR Partners LP**

Yara International ASA

*
Agrium, Inc. (Agrium) and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (Potash Corp) are included in the peer group companies from December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2017. On January 2, 2018, Agrium and Potash Corp completed a merger of equals transaction to form Nutrien, Ltd. The cumulative investment in each of Agrium and Potash Corp, assuming dividend reinvestments up to December 31, 2017, was converted into shares of Nutrien, Ltd. on January 2, 2018 using the exchange ratio in the merger of equals transaction consummated on that date. Nutrien, Ltd. was included in the peer group companies for the period from January 2, 2018 through December 31, 2019.

**
CVR Partners LP and OCI N.V. were excluded from the calculation of the 10-year total shareholder return because they each had less than 10-years of trading history.

For purposes of calculating the TSR of CF Industries and the peer group index for the 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10-year periods ending December 31, 2019, the beginning stock price for each peer group company was established by its respective closing price on the last trading day immediately preceding January 1 of the first fiscal year of the applicable measurement period. The returns of the peer group companies were weighted according to their respective market capitalizations as of the date used to establish the beginning stock price. For Yara International ASA, Incitec Pivot Limited and OCI N.V., we used their respective home exchange stock prices, converted into U.S. dollars for TSR calculation purposes.


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Compensation Program Highlights

Our executive compensation practices are overseen and administered by the compensation and management development committee, which is comprised exclusively of independent directors. The committee is responsible for designing an executive compensation program – including approving any changes to it – that effectively incentivizes our executives to create long-term value for our shareholders.

​  Summary

More Details
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​  
Compensation
Philosophy


Our compensation philosophy seeks toalign the interests of our employees and our shareholders through focusing on the total compensation (base salary, short-term incentives, long-term incentives, and benefits) of our employees, including our executive officers. We seek to benefit from this strategy byattracting key talent, retaining strong performers, increasing productivity, and maximizing operational and financial results, while also implementing compensation programs that arecost effective, market competitive, and sustainable across business cycles.P. 54
​ ​ 
​  
Key Elements of
Compensation Program


SalaryPaid in line with individual performance and contribution to company goals and aligned to competitive market dataP. 55,59
​ ​ 
​  Annual Cash IncentivesThe amount of the actual incentive earned is determined based on our level of achievement of two performance metrics:

75%: level of achievement ofAdjusted EBITDA* (Primary Metric)

25%: level of achievement ofammonia production goals, subject to first achieving a gating level of performance onbehavioral safety practices (Secondary Metric)

P. 55, 59-65
​ ​ 
​  Long-Term Equity IncentivesA specified cash value amount is split among two different equity award types:

60%: PRSUs (3-year cliff vesting based on averagereturn on net assets (RONA)* over three one-year periods, and a TSR modifier that can decrease or increase payout by up to 20%)

40%: RSUs (3-year ratable vesting)

P. 55, 65-69
​ ​ 
​  
Rigorous Benchmarking and
Incentive Target Setting


Bench-markingOur total direct compensation istargeted at the 50th percentile of our Industry Reference Group, which is comprised of 17 companies in related industries, and the overall general industry market data.P. 57
​ ​ 
Incentive Metrics and Performance Levels

We utilize performance metrics for our incentive compensation programsthat align executive interests with those of our shareholders

Executives are focused on achieving top performance across metrics that aredirectly tied to shareholder value creation and our core strategic objectives

The compensation and management development committee considersthe previous year's financial performance, market trends and the company's annual business plan when setting goals and targets for our incentive compensation programs

The performance metrics and target performance levels reflectthe inherent cyclicality of our business

P. 55-58,

60-64,

66-71

​ ​ 
​  
Leading Compensation
Governance Practices


Our leading compensation governance practices include:

Strong pay-for-performance alignment

Robust clawback policy covering incentive awards

Stock ownership guidelines

Performance metrics that align executive interests with interests of shareholders

A majority of compensation for CEO and other executive officers is performance-based, at risk, and paid in equity


No employment agreements

No repriced stock options

Minimal perquisites

Executive officers are prohibited from hedging or pledging our stock

No new excise tax gross-ups after 2011 (CEO, CFO and SVP-HR have no such gross-up)

​ ​ 
*
For the definitions of Adjusted EBITDA and RONA, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Discussion and Analysis: In Detail – Key Elements of NEO Compensation Program – Our Metrics Defined."

Table of Contents

2019 Target Total Compensation

The compensation and management development committee tookbelieves the majority of compensation should be composed of awards that are performance-based – with direct ties to the Company and individual employee performance. The significant majority of each NEO's target compensation is at-risk based on company performance.

2019 Target Total Direct Compensation Mix

The following graphs illustrate the mix of total target direct compensation actions with respect tofor our namedchief executive officers during 2017 or related to 2017 performance:

In December 2016,officer and for the other NEOs for 2019:

GRAPHIC

AIP: Annual Incentive Plan (annual bonus), cash settled

LTIP: Long-Term Incentive Plan, denominated in equity

2019 CEO Target Total Compensation

The compensation and management development committee approveddetermined that our CEO's base salariessalary and the target value of his annual incentivesincentive award for 2017 that were2019 should remain unchanged from those in effect forin 2016, 2017 and 2018 due to target annualcash compensation beingcontinuing to be in line with the reference group of 18 similar companiesour Industry Reference Group (described in related industries against which we compare our compensation (our "Industry Reference Group")greater detail below) and the overall general industry survey data and in recognition of industry market conditions at the time. For 2017, theThe committee determined to use EBITDA (defined below), adjusted EBITDA (defined below) and relative adjusted EBITDA growth as the performance metrics for determining short-term incentive payments. See "2017 Cash Compensation" below for more information. Additional information regardingincreased our Industry Reference Group is set forth below under the heading "Industry Reference Group."

In early 2017, the compensation committee reviewed ourCEO's target long-term incentive program and granted long-term incentive awards to our named executive officers. The committee determined that the long-term incentive awards to our named executive officersaward value for 2017 would be composed of 60% stock options, 20% time-vesting restricted stock units ("RSUs") and 20% performance vesting restricted stock units ("PRSUs"). See "2017 Long-term Incentives" below for more information.
In addition to the long-term incentive awards granted to our named executive officers in connection with setting the officers' target compensation for 2017, the compensation committee awarded the named executive officers additional RSUs as a supplemental performance alignment award. See "2017 Long-term Incentives—Supplemental Performance Alignment Awards" below for more information. If the values of these supplemental grants had been included in the above pie charts, the percentage of total target compensation represented by long-term incentives would be higher than the percentages reflected above (69% in the case of our chief executive officer and 58% in the case of the average of the other named executive officers).

The compensation committee recently determined that each of our named executive officers earned 126% of the executive's target opportunity with respect to the executive's annual incentive award for 2017, as described below under "Approval of Annual Incentive Payments for 2017."

In addition, the three-year performance period for PRSU awards granted in 2015 ended on December 31, 2017. In accordance with our pay-for-performance philosophy, because our total shareholder return ("TSR") performance over the three-year performance period did not achieve at least the 25th percentile of the S&P 500 Index, these PRSU awards resulted in no payout and no

Table of Contents

The compensation committee has also approved compensation levels for our named executive officers for 2018, including base salaries, target annual incentive awards, and long-term incentive awards. The base salaries and target annual incentives approved for 2018 remain unchanged from those in effect for 2016 and 2017 due to target annual compensation continuing to be2019 in line with our Industry Reference Group and the overall general industry survey datadata. The committee believes the minimal changes over several years underscores that our executive compensation program is appropriately aligned with performance, and in recognition of industry market conditions atthat salaries and the time. With respect to long-termtarget value for incentive awards in order to further align pay delivery with long-term performance and to reflect trends in executive compensation generally, beginning with 2018 grants for the named executive officers, the compensation committee increased the percentageare appropriately benchmarked.

 

Pay Element

 
2019


2018


% Change

 

Salary

 $1,150,000 $1,150,000  0% 

 

Target Annual Incentive

 $1,552,500 $1,552,500  0% 

 

Target Long-Term Incentive

 $5,900,009 $5,300,000  11% 

 

Total

 $8,602,509 $8,002,500  7% 

Table of the total award value allocated to PRSUs to 60%, increased the percentage allocated to RSUs to 40% and eliminated stock option awards. See "2018 Compensation" below for further information.

Stockholder Feedback on Compensation PracticesContents

Our compensation committee carefully considers feedback from our stockholders regarding the compensation program for our named executive officers. At each of our last seven annual meetings of stockholders (beginning in 2011 when the first Say on Pay vote was held), greater than 90% of the votes cast on the Say on Pay proposal at the particular meeting were voted in favor of the proposal. The compensation committee believes this affirms stockholders' support of CF Industries' approach to executive compensation for its named executive officers, and did not change its approach for 2017 in response to the outcome of prior Say on Pay votes. The compensation committee will continue to consider the outcome of our stockholders' Say on Pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPENSATION APPROACH AND OBJECTIVESShareholder Engagement

OnWe believe that building positive relationships with our shareholders is critical to CF Industries' success. We value the views of and regularly communicate with our shareholders on a variety of topics, including corporate governance, executive compensation and related matters. Management shares the feedback received from shareholders with the Board. Our chairman, our committee chairs, and other members of the Board are available to participate in meetings with shareholders as appropriate. Requests for such meetings are considered on a case-by-case basis. Our engagement activities have resulted in valuable feedback that has contributed to our decision-making with respect to these matters. We welcome input and feedback and look forward to continued engagement with our shareholders.

We conduct shareholder outreach campaigns in the spring and in the fall. Our engagements in the spring are primarily focused on ballot items on which shareholders will vote at our annual meeting. Our engagements in the fall generally focus on voting outcomes from our prior annual meeting – including direct shareholder feedback on how they voted on ballot items – as well as potential corporate governance or executive compensation changes the Board and its committees are considering. The fall engagement also presents an opportunity to discuss with shareholders developments in their methodologies and analyses and potential future areas of focus.

GRAPHIC

Spring 2019 Shareholder Engagement Campaign

In the first half of 2019 leading up to our 2019 annual meeting, we contacted our top 40 shareholders comprising approximately 75% of our outstanding shares to invite them to speak with members of our senior management and the chair of our compensation and management development committee. We held meetings with 7 shareholders (our compensation and management development committee chair participated in two of these meetings) representing approximately 23% of our outstanding shares, discussing with these shareholders the ballot items on which shareholders would be voting at our 2019 annual meeting, in particular our 2018 executive compensation program and the say-on-pay vote, and other governance focused matters. In these conversations, the overwhelming majority of these shareholders expressed support for the design of our ongoing basis,compensation program. A minority of these


Table of Contents

shareholders expressed concern regarding the target level of adjusted EBITDA for our 2018 annual incentive program being set at the same level as 2017 despite performance above target in 2017. In addition to reviewing with these shareholders the portions of our 2019 proxy statement that address our target setting process, we filed additional proxy materials summarizing these topics in advance of the annual meeting. For 2019, the target level of both adjusted EBITDA (for our annual incentive plan) and RONA (for our long term incentive plan) exceed our 2018 performance. All of the feedback from these meetings was relayed to the compensation and management development committee reviewsand full Board. Our 2019 say-on-pay vote received over 70% shareholder support at the 2019 annual meeting.

Fall 2019 Shareholder Engagement Campaign – Responsiveness to 2019 Say-on-Pay Vote

During the second half of 2019 following our 2019 annual meeting, we contacted 46 shareholders comprising approximately 75% of our outstanding shares inviting them to engage in dialogue regarding their voting decisions for the prior proxy and to discuss ESG topics broadly. We held meetings with 14 shareholders (our compensation and management development committee chair participated in one of these meetings) representing approximately 42% of our outstanding shares. Shareholders who did not support our say-on-pay vote last year were most commonly concerned with our decision to set the target level of adjusted EBITDA for our 2018 annual incentive program at the same level as 2017 despite performance above target in 2017. A large majority of shareholders were supportive of the overall compensation structure. All of this feedback was relayed to the compensation and management development committee and the full Board.

In response to shareholder feedback, we enhanced our disclosure in the proxy statement to further detail how the compensation and management development committee sets targets in the annual and long-term incentive programs, the factors that contribute to the committee's decisions and to compare the historical payout percentages to target levels.

Based on shareholder feedback received in 2019, the compensation and management development committee retained the current structure of our executive compensation program for 2020.

We will continue to regularly review (along with outside compensation consultants) our executive compensation programs to ensure alignment with our compensation policies relativephilosophy, and we are committed to market competitivenesscontinuing our dialogue with shareholders so that we can be proactive in responding to emerging industry trends and the needsbe responsive to shareholder concerns.


Table of our business and then determines what changes in the compensation program, if any, are appropriate.Contents

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHYDISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS: IN DETAIL

Compensation Philosophy

Our compensation and management development committee has adopted a compensation philosophy that seeks to align the interests of our employees and our stockholdersshareholders through focusing on the total compensation (base salary, short-term incentives, long-term incentives, and benefits) of our employees, including our named executive officers.NEOs. We seek to benefit from this strategy by attracting key talent, retaining beststrong performers, increasing productivity, and maximizing operational and financial results, while also implementing compensation programs that are cost effective, market competitive, and sustainable across business cycles.

Our executive compensation program is designed to reward executives for their contributions to our short-term and long-term results. Annual cash incentive compensation is based on the achievement of annual performance goals – both financial and operating objectives – while the majority of executives' long-term incentive opportunity is based on performance against criteria that are correlated with both annual and long-term shareholder value.

Our goal is to provide direct compensation to our NEOs that is market competitive with other comparable companies. To obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices, the compensation and management development committee received in 20172019 a market assessment from its independent outside compensation consultant, Exequity LLP ("Exequity"), that was derived from published survey compensation data, which Exequity adjusted for variations in revenue among the included companies. To further gauge the competitiveness of our total compensation offering, we also compare ourselves against our Industry Reference Group, which is a group of 1817 similar companies in related industries. Additional information regarding this group of companies is set forth below under the heading "Industry"Use of Industry Reference Group."

Incentive opportunities are structured in a way that recognizes our cyclicality and emphasis on a team-based culture.


Table of Contents

COMPONENTS OF COMPENSATIONKey Elements of NEO Compensation Program

The following compensation elements support the needs of the business, our stockholders, and our employees:


Component
Key Characteristics and Rationale



Component

Key Characteristics and Rationale

Salary

We seek to pay salaries in line with individual performance and contribution to company goals.

In the aggregate, base salaries of our NEOs are targeted aroundat the median of the peer group companies in our Industry Reference Group and the overall general industry market data from the outside compensation consultant's market assessment. Individual performance and potential, relative criticality of the individual position in relation to achievement of the company's goals, and business affordability are also considered in determining base salaries.

To maintain our desired market position, we conduct annual salary reviews.

Short-Term Incentives

Variable compensation component that provides executive officers and other employees with the opportunity to earn additional annual cash compensation beyond base salary.

The role of short-term incentives is to reward and encourage the achievement of annual financial results and other specified corporate performance goals.

Short-term incentives are also targeted aroundat the market median, and achievement of these awards depends on attaining corporate performance goals.

For 2017,2018 and 2019, the short-term incentive was subject to achievement of a specified threshold level of EBITDA. If the threshold level of EBITDA was achieved, then the amount of the actual incentive earned would bewas determined based on our level of achievement of twothe following primary and secondary performance metrics: 75% based on our level of achievement of adjustedAdjusted EBITDA and 25% based upon the percentage change in our adjusted EBITDA for 2017 relativelevel of achievement of specified ammonia production goals, subject to thefirst achieving a gating level of performance of a comparison group of other chemical companies, as described below under the heading "Review of the Short-term Incentive Program."behavioral safety practices goals ("safety gate").

Long-Term Incentives

Variable compensation component that focuses on enterprise value creation and employee retention. Long-term incentives are provided through annual stock-based awards.

Our plans allow the use of stock options, full-value share-based awards (such as the RSUs and PRSUs granted to our named executive officers), and cash-based awards.


Table of Contents







Component

Key Characteristics and Rationale

 

Participation is extended to executive officers and other key employees. DistributionEligibility guidelines with award ranges related toreflecting position responsibility levels and competitive market practices are updated annually. The guidelines allow for individual variation in long-term incentives based on performance level, potential contribution, and value to the business.

 

In general, long-term incentives for our executive officers are targeted betweenat the market median andwith the 75th percentile of the peer group companies in our Industry Reference Group and the overallopportunity to receive above market from the outside compensation consultant's market assessment.awards for excellent performance.

 

Long-term incentive awards granted to our named executive officersNEOs in connection with setting target compensation for 20172018 and 2019 were based on a specified cash value, which amount was split among threetwo different award types—60% stock options, 20% RSUs,PRSUs and 20% PRSUs—as described below under the heading "2017 Long-term Incentives." In order to further align pay delivery with long-term performance and to reflect trends in executive compensation generally, beginning with 2018 grants for the named executive officers, the compensation committee increased the percentage of the total long-term incentive award value allocated to PRSUs to 60%, increased the percentage allocated to RSUs to 40% and eliminated stock option awards as described below under the heading "2018 Compensation."RSUs.

 

In additionPRSUs awards are subject to the long-term incentive awards granted to our named executive officers in connection with setting target compensation for 2017, the compensation committee awarded the named executive officers additional RSUs as a supplemental performance alignment award as described below under the heading "2017 Long-term Incentives—Supplemental Performance Alignment Awards."three-year vesting criteria based on:

 

Benefit, Retirement and Severance

o

Plans offer coverage at market-competitive levels.Average return on net assets (RONA) over three one-year periods

 

Plans

o

We seekA modifier pursuant to keep healthwhich the number of shares earned based on RONA performance may be increased or decreased by up to 20% based on our three-year TSR performance against a threshold, target, and welfare benefit plans simple in scope and range, focusing on critical employee needs.maximum level of performance

Retirement plans are intended to support employees in attaining financial security for the future.

Severance plans are intended to provide employees with a temporary income source following termination (other than for cause), including in the case of a change in control to ensure continuity of management while such an event is pending.


Table of Contents

Compensation Metrics Tie to Business Strategy

The compensation and management development committee selects performance metrics for our incentive compensation programs that align executive interests with those of our shareholders. Executives are focused on achieving top performance across metrics that are directly tied to shareholder value creation and our core strategic objectives, as indicated below:

Annual Incentives
​ ​ ​ 
MetricAlignment

Adjusted EBITDAAdjusted EBITDA is the primary metric by which we measure our profitability and by which investors measure our performance
Behavioral Safety PracticesThe "safety gate" underscores our commitment to CF's "Do It Right" culture and our constant efforts to drive workplace safety. Operating in a safe and responsible manner is a core value and an integral part of what sets CF Industries apart to all our stakeholders.
Ammonia
Production
Focus on operational excellence in terms of operational execution and asset utilization will help create value and aligns with recent investments in our production capabilities


Long-Term Incentives
​ ​ ​ 
MetricAlignment

Return on
Net Assets (RONA)
RONA is typically correlated with long-term TSR performance and is viewed as an indicator of the results of management's operating decisions
Total Shareholder ReturnExplicitly links executive incentives with shareholder value creation

Our Metrics Defined

As described above, our annual incentive plan uses Adjusted EBITDA as its primary performance metric and our long-term incentive program uses average return on net assets, or RONA, for the PRSU three-year performance criteria.


Table of Contents

ALLOCATION OF COMPENSATION ELEMENTSThe Compensation Process

Allocation of Compensation Elements

We provide a mixture of cash compensation and non-cash compensation to our named executive officers.NEOs. The cash portion consists primarily of base salaries and short-term incentive awards. The non-cash portion consists primarily of stock-based long-term incentive awards.

We have not established any target allocation between cash and non-cash compensation or between short-term and long-term incentives for our named executive officers as a group. Instead, our allocation is based primarily on competitive market practices and the respective median levels by position for base salaries, annual incentive awards, and long-term incentive awards.

In addition to using benchmark survey data, we also consider internal factors that may cause us to adjust particular elements of an individual executive officer's compensation. These factors may include an individual's operating responsibilities, management level, and tenure and performance in the position. To assist in its evaluation, our compensation committee reviews the details of an executive's historical and proposed compensation as described below, including a review of our named executive officers' existing base salaries and target annual incentive levels in connection with the approval of their new base salaries and target annual incentive levels for the following year. In addition, four times per year the compensation committee reviews reports regarding our named executive officers' holdings and transactions involving our stock, including our named executive officers' holdings of stock and long-term stock-based incentive awards, stock option exercises, purchases, sales and gifts of stock, and surrenders of vested shares of restricted stock in order to satisfy withholding tax requirements, as applicable.

We generally do not consider accounting and tax issues in setting compensation levels or in establishing the particular elements of compensation. As discussed below, however, when our compensation committee grants awards under our long-term incentive program, the committee does consider the accounting for various stock-based incentives under FASB ASC Topic 718 and the tax treatment of such incentive awards under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, on December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") became law, significantly amending Section 162(m). The Tax Act eliminated the performance-based compensation exception with respect to tax years beginning January 1, 2018, but included a transition rule with respect to compensation that is provided pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 and not materially modified after that date. Accordingly, commencing in 2018, the company's tax deduction with regard to compensation of covered employees generally will be limited to $1 million per taxable year for each officer. We will generally seek to preserve the deductibility of performance-based compensation by meeting the requirements of Section 162(m), as amended by the Tax Act, in accordance with the transition rule applicable to binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017, to the extent practicable and in the best interests of CF Industries and its stockholders.

Our allocation among base salary, short-term incentives, and long-term incentives varies significantly by management level, reflecting individual responsibility levels and competitive market practices. In general, our more senior executive officers receive a greater percentage of their total expected compensation in the form of incentives (particularly long-term incentives) and a correspondingly lower percentage in the form of salary.

In addition to using benchmark survey data, we also consider internal factors that may cause us to adjust particular elements of an individual executive officer's compensation. These factors may include an individual's operating responsibilities, management level, tenure, potential, and performance in the position.

To assist in its evaluation, our compensation and management development committee reviews the details of an executive's historical and proposed compensation as described below, including a review of our NEOs' existing base salaries and target annual incentive levels in connection with the approval of their new base salaries and target annual incentive levels for the following year.

In addition, four times per year the compensation and management development committee reviews reports regarding our NEOs' holdings and transactions involving our stock, including our NEOs' holdings of stock and long-term stock-based incentive awards, stock option exercises, purchases, sales and gifts of stock, and surrenders of vested shares of restricted stock in order to satisfy withholding tax requirements, as applicable.

ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Compensation Benchmarking

The Board has adopted a written charter for ourOur total direct compensation committee, which is available to stockholders at our corporate website, www.cfindustries.com, or by writing to our corporate secretarytargeted at the address on50th percentile of our Industry Reference Group and the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement.

overall general industry market data from the outside compensation consultant's market assessment. The Board makes compensation decisions for our non-employee directors, acting on the recommendationand management development committee considers skills, performance, capabilities, experience, criticality of the compensation committee,role, and the committee makesfuture potential of each NEO in setting actual compensation; therefore, total direct compensation decisionscan be above or below the 50th percentile for different NEOs.


Table of Contents

our executive officers, giving consideration to the recommendations of our chief executive officer with respect to the executive officers other than himself.Committee Process for Incentive Target-Setting

The chaircompensation and management development committee considers the previous year's financial performance, market trends and the company's annual business plan when setting goals and targets for our incentive compensation programs at the end of each calendar year. Management prepares the company's annual business plan and reviews it in detail with the Board. Management prepares the annual business plan through a rigorous process utilizing a combination of factors, including management's view of current industry conditions, recent historical performance, internal forecasts, as well as external public market indicators.

Our industry is inherently cyclical, and our financial results are significantly impacted by the pronounced effects of highly volatile commodity prices for both our fertilizer products as well as natural gas, which is our principle feedstock. As a result, the industry conditions in existence during any given fiscal year can be dramatically different from, and have no significant bearing on, the conditions that will exist in the following year. Accordingly, the target performance levels set by the compensation and management development committee for our annual incentive program for any given year may be higher or lower or unchanged from the levels set in the prior year.

In addition to cyclicality, the timing – in terms of calendar – of the compensation committee sets the agenda for committee meetings, with the assistance of our chief executive officer, our senior vice president of human resources, and our corporate secretary. These executive officers also attend meetings of the compensation committee. At each meeting that is held in person, the compensation committee members also meet in executive session without any members of management present unless the committee determines that no executive session is necessary.

The compensation committee has authority under its charter to retain, approve fees for, and terminate advisors, consultants, and agents as it deems necessary to assist in the fulfillment of its responsibilities. Pursuant to this authority, the compensation committee has engaged an independent executive compensation consulting firm to assist the committee in making recommendations and decisions regarding compensationdevelopment committee's decision-making process around target-setting for our directors and executive officers. Theincentive compensation committee also meets regularly withprograms is particularly important to understanding its compensation consultant in executive sessions without management present. Exequity served as compensation consultant for 2017. See "Compensation Consultant Matters" below for additional information. Our senior vice president of human resources also supports the compensation committee in its duties.

From time to time, the compensation committee may delegate to our chief executive officer, our senior vice president of human resources, or our corporate secretary the authority to implementlimited visibility into certain decisions of the committee or to fulfill certain administrative duties.

ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

In 2017, the compensation committee authorized its compensation consultant, Exequity, to work with our human resources department to compare the compensation we pay to our executive officers with compensation paid to comparable executive officers at peer companies in our Industry Reference Group and the overall market based on surveysexternal factors that reflect comparative data of compensation paid to executives in similar positions as our executive officers, and to make compensation recommendations based on market and industry practices.

In connection with its annual review of the compensation of our non-employee directors, the compensation committee also authorized Exequity to work with our human resources department to compare the compensation we pay to our non-employee directors with compensation paid to comparable directors at peer companies in our Industry Reference Group and the overall market based on the 2015-2016 National Association of Corporate Directors survey on director compensation.

The compensation consultant regularly attends meetings of our compensation committee and makes presentations to our compensation committee members regarding such materials and recommendations. The compensation committee reviews these materials and recommendations but exercises independent judgment in determining the compensation payable to our named executive officers. Any recommendations of the compensation committee with respect to non-employee director compensation are subject to approval by the Board.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES

Our compensation committee has taken a number of steps designed to enhance its ability to carry out its responsibilities effectively and also to ensure that we maintain strong links between executive pay and performance. Examples of these actions include:

adopting a statement of our compensation philosophy (see "Compensation Philosophy" above);

Table of Contents

instituting a practice of holding executive sessions (without management present) at every compensation committee meeting that is held in person unless the committee determines that no executive session is necessary;

retaining an outside compensation consultant to advise the compensation committee on executive compensation issues and meeting regularly with the compensation consultant in executive sessions without management present (see "Compensation Consultant Matters" below);

adopting stock ownership guidelines for our officers and directors and modifying the guidelines from time to time as appropriate (see "Stock Ownership Guidelines" below);

adopting an industry reference group for use in establishing compensation and incentive levels and modifying the composition of the group from time to time as appropriate (see "Industry Reference Group" below);

reviewing on an annual basis the existing base salaries and target annual incentives for our executive officers and approving changes in cash compensation levels as appropriate (see "2017 Cash Compensation" below);

reviewing on an annual basis our short-term incentive program, modifying the program as appropriate, and granting short-term incentive awards to our executive officers (see "2017 Cash Compensation" below);

reviewing on an annual basis our long-term incentive program, modifying the program as appropriate, and granting long-term incentive awards to our executive officers, including adding the grant of performance-based awards to the mix of annual awards granted to our named executive officers commencing in fiscal year 2014 (see "2017 Long-term Incentives" below). In order to further align pay delivery with long-term performance and to reflect trends in executive compensation generally, beginning with 2018 grants to our named executive officers, the compensation committee increased the percentage of the total award value allocated to PRSUs to 60%, increased the percentage allocated to RSUs to 40% and eliminated stock option awards (See "2018 Compensation" below);

reviewing on an annual basis our change in control, severance, and retirement benefits and modifying these benefits as appropriate (see "Change in Control, Severance, and Retirement Benefits" below);

reviewing on an annual basis "tally sheets" summarizing the total compensation and benefits for our chief executive officer and the other named executive officers included in the compensation tables of this Proxy Statement under various assumptions and scenarios (see "Compensation of Chief Executive Officer" below as well as the other above-referenced items);

reviewing on an annual basishave the potential effects of the various components ofto significantly impact our compensationfinancial and benefits upon individual and collective behavior and ultimately our risk profile and approach to risk management (see "Compensation and Benefits Risk Analysis" below);

reviewing on an annual basis theoperating results, of our stockholders' last advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers and determining if any changes to our executive compensation program are appropriate based on such results (see "Stockholder Feedback on Compensation Practices" above); and

reviewing on an annual basis the compensation of our non-employee directors and recommending that the Board approve changes in such compensation from time to time as appropriate (see "Director Compensation" above).
including natural gas prices, international trade policies, geopolitics, currency fluctuations, weather, etc.

Illustrative Timeline for Compensation and Management Development Committee Process
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
May

October

December

Review of current compensation trends and issues

Independent Compensation Consultant provides an analysis of current and potential peers based on strategy, business structure, and industry

Evaluation of STI and LTI program outcomes against overall program design, stated goals, and alignment with strategy

Review of current/future compensation program objectives, design, and goals

Review of proxy peer analysis and overall general industry benchmark market data against our NEOs

STI and LTI metrics for upcoming year established

Completion of internal budget forecasting, incorporating supply-demand forecasts with external market prices such as natural gas futures strips

Setting STI and LTI performance goals and targets taking into account the previous year's financial performance, market trends and the company's annual business plan


Table of Contents

2017 CASH COMPENSATIONReview and Approval of 2019 Cash Compensation

In setting cash compensation levels for 2017,2019, the compensation and management development committee reviewed the base salaries and target annual incentives for our named executive officersNEOs that had been in effect for 2016 and, in December 2016, approved levels for 2017 that were unchanged from those in effect for 2016. The following graphs illustrate the mix of salary versus target annual incentive for our chief executive officer and for the other named executive officers for 2017.

GRAPHIC

Review of Existing Compensation Levels2018.

In connection with its review, of our existing base salaries and target annual incentives which had been in effect for 2016, the compensation and management development committee reviewed a reportseveral reports from its outside compensation consultant, Exequity, to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices. In performing its market assessment, Exequity used published survey compensation data, and adjusted for variations in revenue among the included companies.

In addition, the compensation and management development committee reviewed information provided by the compensation consultant regarding the publicly reported cash compensation of named executive officersNEOs of the group of companies in our Industry Reference Group, which is comprised of 1817 companies in related industries. Additional information regarding this group of companies is set forth below under the heading "Industry"Use of Industry Reference Group."

The compensation and management development committee also reviewedconsidered cash compensation recommendations from our chief executive officer for each of the NEOs other executive officers.than himself. These recommendations took into account the chief executive officer's assessment of each individual's operating responsibilities, management level, tenure and performance in the position, and potential.

TheReview of Base Salary Compensation

During its review of NEO's base salaries, the compensation and management development committee considered all of this information in the context of the goals and objectives of our executive compensation plans. As noted above, we seek to pay salaries in line with individual performance and contribution to company goals.

Table of Contents

Review of the Short-term Incentive Program

The compensation and management development committee seeks to ensure that the compensation program aligns with the company's strategic objectives. Over time, the committee has refined the program, notably the incentive plan metrics, to align executives' focus areas with strategic imperatives that have evolved along with market conditions and our operations. Our primary metric for each of the last four years has been Adjusted EBITDA at a weighting of 50% to 75%. For 2018, the compensation and management development committee introduced a new secondary metric, a level of achievement of an ammonia production goal, subject to achieving a gating level of performance of a behavioral safety practices goal. The committee believed a focus on operational excellence would drive the company to safely maximize operational execution and asset utilization. The changes to our secondary metric for 2018 also demonstrated our commitment to safety and the "Do It Right" culture.


Table of Contents

During its review of our short-term incentive program, the compensation and management development committee considered the following general goals:

The compensation and management development committee also considered the following factors specific to our company:

In addition, the compensation and management development committee reviewed a report from Exequity, the committee's outside compensation consultant, regarding competitive market practices with respect to the use of short-term incentives.

The compensation and management development committee considered all of this information in the context of the goals and objectives of our executive compensation plans. As noted above, we use short-term incentives to provide executive officers and other employees with the opportunity to earn additional annual compensation beyond base salary. The role of short-term incentives is to reward and encourage the achievement of annual financial results and other specified corporate performance goals. OurIn the aggregate our short-term incentive awards are targeted aroundat the median of the peer group companies in our Industry Reference Group and the overall general industry market median.data from the outside compensation consultant's market assessment. Additional information regarding these goals and objectives is set forth above under the headings "Compensation Philosophy" and "Components of Compensation."

Selection of Primary and Secondary Performance MetricMetrics for 20172019

Based on its review and the other factors discussed above, the compensation and management development committee determined that the annual incentive awards to our named executive officersNEOs for 20172019 would be based inupon our level of achievement of the following primary and secondary performance metrics:


Table of Contents

These primary and secondary performance metrics and their 75% and 25% weightings, respectively, were unchanged from our 2018 annual incentive program. In setting the performance metrics for 2018 and years prior to the modifications to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the annual incentive program incorporated a primary overallthreshold EBITDA performance metric of $300 million formetric. If the company's 2017 fiscal year. If that primarythreshold EBITDA performance metric was attainedachieved, actual incentive payments were approved by the compensation and management committee utilizing its negative discretion based on performance against the primary and secondary performance metrics (i.e., for 2017, each named executive officer would become eligible for an2018, the Primary Metric and the Secondary Metric as described above.) The annual incentive award with respect to 2017 of $3 million, which amount would be subject to reduction in the discretion of the compensation committee (sometimes referred to as "negative discretion"). The committee expected to use that discretion if the EBITDA performance target was attained. If the primary EBITDAprogram's performance metric had not been attained, no annual incentive awards would be made to the named executive officers under the 2017 executive incentive program established pursuant to the company's annual incentive program. EBITDA is computed asthe sum of (i) net earnings attributable to common stockholdersplus (ii)  interest expense (income)—netplus (iii) income taxesplus (iv) depreciation, depletion, and amortizationless (v) loan fee amortization.

The compensation committee determined that the use of an overall EBITDA performance metric,structure, combined with the reservation of the committee's right to use negative discretion, provided the maximum level of flexibility to reward and encourage the achievement of annual financial results and other specified corporate performance goals while retaining the ability to pay incentive awards to


Table of Contents

executive officers which arewere deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code (as discussedInternal Revenue Code. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act modified Section 162(m) to remove the performance-based compensation exception, and, as a result, compensation paid to our covered employees in more detail below). Theexcess of $1,000,000 will generally not be deductible. Because of these changes to Section 162(m), the compensation and management development committee determined thatstreamlined the EBITDA target described above represented an appropriate levelstructure of corporate performance to warrant payment of some level of anthe annual incentive award to our executives for 2017, with the actual incentive payment to be made at the discretion of the committee based on performance against the specified secondaryplan performance metrics as described below.to eliminate the threshold EBITDA performance metric for 2019.

Selection of Secondary Performance MetricsLevels for 2017Primary Performance Metric for 2019

If the primary EBITDA performance metric was attained, it was theThe compensation committee's intention to use its negative discretion to pay 2017 annual bonuses based upon our level of achievement of the following secondary performance metrics:

75% of each executive's annual incentive payment opportunity was based upon our level of achievement of adjusted EBITDA for 2017 (the "Adjusted EBITDA Metric"); and

the remaining 25% was based upon the percentage change in our adjusted EBITDA for 2017 compared to our adjusted EBITDA for 2016, ranking our performance in this regard relative to the performance of a comparison group comprised of us and eleven other chemical companies (the "Relative EBITDA Metric").

The compensationmanagement development committee established the following performance levels and corresponding percentages of target opportunity earned with respect to the Adjusted EBITDAPrimary Metric for 2017:2019:








Performance Level

Primary Metric

Adjusted EBITDA Achieved


Percentage of
Primary Metric
Target Award Earned



Performance Level

Adjusted EBITDA
Achieved


Percentage of
Target Short-Term
Incentive Award Earned


Below Threshold

 Less than $1.0 billion 

Less than $600 Million

0%

Threshold

$600 Million

50%

  

TargetThreshold

 $1.0 billion 

$825 Million

100%

Ceiling

$1.6 Billion

200%

50%
  

Target

$1.4 billion100%

Maximum

$1.8 billion200%

Straight line interpolation is used to determine the achievement percentage for the Adjusted EBITDAPrimary Metric between threshold and target and between target and ceilingmaximum performance levels.

Selection of Performance Levels for Secondary Performance Metric for 2019

For the Secondary Metric, each of our production and distribution facilities develops and implements specific behavioral safety objectives that are pertinent and meaningful to each work group at the site. Each employee is involved in developing and taking ownership for completing objectives that make their workplace safer and effect a positive change in the safety culture.

Each quarter, evaluations are conducted and an overall achievement grade (A through F) for each hourly group and individual manager is assigned. Under the Secondary Metric, the quarterly grades issued to all site employees were aggregated. If at least 95% of the grades were "B" or better for the year, the safety performance gating requirement would be


Table of Contents

achieved. If the safety performance gating requirement was not achieved, there would be no payout under the Secondary Metric.

The compensation and management development committee established the following percentile rankingsammonia production performance levels and corresponding percentages of target opportunity earned with respect to the Relative EBITDASecondary Metric for 2017:2019, subject to first achieving the safety performance gating requirement:







Relative EBITDA Metric Percentile Rank

Percentage of
Target Short-Term
Incentive Award Earned


At or below 20th percentilePerformance Level

 Secondary Metric

Tons of Ammonia Produced


0%Percentage of
Secondary Metric
Target Award Earned

Above 20th percentile and at or below 40th percentile

50%

 

Above 40th percentile and at or below 60th percentile

100%

Above 60th percentile and at or below 80th percentile

150%

Above 80th percentileBelow Threshold

 Less than 9.3 million tons 0%

200%Threshold

 9.3 million tons50%

Target

10.0 million tons100%

Maximum

10.3 million tons200%

Table of ContentsStraight line interpolation is used to determine the achievement percentage for the Secondary Metric between threshold and target and between target and maximum performance levels.

The following arecompensation and management development committee retained discretion to adjust the elevenperformance levels to address circumstances that impact our ability to meet production expectations, such as market-based curtailments, severe weather events or other chemical companiesevents of force majeure that together with us compriseresult in production outages, and other adjustments approved by the comparison group against which our performance was rankedcompensation and management development committee.

Additional Target-Setting Considerations for purposes of the Relative EBITDA Metric:

Agrium Inc.*

LSB Industries,  Inc.

Celanese Corporation*

The Mosaic Company*

CVR Partners,  LP

Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc.*

Eastman Chemical Company*

Westlake Chemical Corporation*

FMC Corporation*

Yara International ASA

Huntsman Corporation*


*
Denotes company that is a member of our Industry Reference Group

Denotes company that is member of the select fertilizer peer group used in the total shareholder return modifier in our PRSUs granted prior to 2017.

"Adjusted EBITDA" is computed asthe sum ofShort-Term Incentive Program (i) EBITDA (as described above)plus (ii) unrealized mark to market losses (gains) on hedgesplus (iii) unrealized and realized losses (gains) associated with foreign exchange on intercompany loan activity or foreign denominated intercompany payables and receivablesplus (iv) acquisition or disposition related transaction costs or feesplus (v) integration costs for acquisitionsplus (vi) losses (gains) on the disposition of equity investments in operating joint venturesplus (vii) restructuring, exit, impairments, system implementation costs or similar types of costsplus (viii) non-capitalized expansion project costsplus (ix) losses (gains) recognized due to the acquisition or disposal of a business or group of assets that represents a major portion of the businessless (x) profits (losses) associated with acquisitions (divestitures) completed during the year.

WhenAs described above, when setting performance levels for the short-term incentive program, the compensation and management development committee takesconsiders the previous year's financial performance, market trends and the company's annual business plan. Going into account historical2019, industry fundamentals were expected to continue to be supportive, with increasing global nitrogen prices above those realized during 2018 and natural gas feedstock prices also forecast to be higher, based on market expectations reflected in forward market curves. In addition, fewer of the company's ammonia units were scheduled for downtime for turnaround and maintenance activity than in 2018. As a result, the target performance levels for both the Primary Metric and management's outlook. Secondary Metric set by the compensation and management development committee were higher than the target levels set and actual results achieved for both metrics in 2018. Maximum performance for both metrics was set at a level judged to be difficult to achieve and threshold performance was set at the lowest level that would justify a payout.

Measured over an extended period, the objective of the committee is to select financial performance levels such that we have a roughly (i) 80% probability of exceeding the threshold level, (ii) 50% probability of exceeding the target level, and (iii) 20% probability of exceeding the ceilingmaximum level.

Although the compensation and management development committee considers management's outlook as one of several factors in evaluating financial performance levels each year, the committee also recognizes that the outlook for any particular year represents only a single scenario from among a broad range of plausible alternatives, given the pronounced effects of highly volatile commodity prices upon our operating results.

In general, the compensation and management development committee aims to achieve a larger payout under the program for years when our performance is superior by long-term


Table of Contents

industry standards, and a smaller payout (or none at all) for years when our performance is relatively weak, while creating incentives for improved performance under all conditions given the inherent cyclicality in our industry.

In reviewingTarget levels of Adjusted EBITDA associated with our annual incentive program and our actual performance relative to these targets are consistent with expectations for a cyclical company. We have a track record of paying for performance and achieve this through setting targets that are rigorous and challenging. The chart below of our Adjusted EBITDA targets, actual results and percentage payouts for 2014 through 2019 demonstrates our pay for performance linkage in the annual incentive program.


Adjusted EBITDA Targets, Actual Results, and Percentage Payouts(1)

GRAPHIC


(1)
Reflects payout percentage on the annual incentive program metric associated with Adjusted EBITDA. For 2014-2015, Return on Net Assets (RONA) was the sole metric in the annual incentive program. Adjusted EBITDA is a key factor in calculating RONA; accordingly the associated Adjusted EBITDA figures are represented here. For 2016-2019, Adjusted EBITDA was the primary metric under the company's annual incentive program (with a weighting of 50% in 2016 and 75% in 2017, 2018 and 2019).

When considering appropriate performance metrics for the short-term incentive program, the compensation and management development committee was also aware ofconsiders alternative metrics for measuring company performance, such as achievement of operating efficiency goals, continued emphasis on the establishment of a behavioral-based safety culture, progress towards strategic objectives, or performance relative to a variable budget, as well as alternative plan designs that emphasize the personal accomplishment of individual or shared goals. The objective in each case would beis to address the inherent cyclicalityincentivize strong operational performance in our industry as well as the pronounced effects of highly volatile commodity prices upon our operating results. an inherently cyclical business.

The compensation and management development committee determined for 20172019 that objective measures of company performance measured on an absoluteutilizing Adjusted EBITDA as the Primary Metric and relative basisammonia production as the Secondary Metric would align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholdersshareholders and reflect our team-based culture. As discussed below, for 2018The committee determined to condition payout on the short-term incentive plan includesSecondary Metric to first achieving the "safety gate" to underscore the company's commitment to our "Do It Right" culture and complement our efforts to drive workplace safety. Operating in a financial performance metric measured by adjusted EBITDAsafe and responsible manner is a core value and an operational performance metric based on behavioralintegral part of what sets CF Industries apart to all our stakeholders. Our safety practices and ammonia production.culture permeates our business in three key ways:

    Engaged culture that empowers consistent behaviors that drive toward excellence.
    Robust systems that provide a clear, repeatable direction toward excellence.

Table of Contents

    Superior performance that aligns effective and efficient environmental, health, and safety activities with operations.

Our commitment to safety never takes a day off, and we have demonstrated that our focus on this priority is yielding positive results. We believe that focusing on leading indicators such as the behavioral safety practices we have incorporated into our annual incentive plan to drive and measure activities that prevent and control safety incidents, results in our industry-leading safety record. During 2019, we set an important company record with our trailing 12 month recordable injury rate of 0.48 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019—the lowest year-end rate we have ever achieved as a company.

Approval of Base Salaries and Target Annual Incentive Awards for 20172019

Based on its review of the general, company-specific, and competitive considerations described above, in December 2016,2018, the compensation and management development committee made the decision that our named executive officers'approved base salaries and target annual incentive awards for 2017 would remainour NEOs for calendar year 2019. In setting compensation levels for 2019, the compensation and management development committee considered a competitive market assessment performed by Exequity, the committee's outside compensation consultant, and the goals and objectives for our executive compensation plans. The base salaries and target annual incentive levels for Mr. Will, our chief executive officer, and Mr. Kelleher, our chief financial officer at the time, remained unchanged from those in effect for 20162018 due to target compensation being in line with our Industry Reference Group and the overall general industry survey data and in recognition of current industry market conditions. The increases in base salaries for Mr. Bohn, Mr. Barnard and Mr. Frost are the first such increases to their base salaries since the 2016 fiscal year.

Mr. Kelleher retired from CF Industries on September 1, 2019 and Mr. Bohn, who had been serving as our senior vice president, manufacturing and distribution, succeeded Mr. Kelleher as chief financial officer upon his retirement.

The table below shows the base salaries and target annual incentive levels for our named executive officersNEOs for 20172019 and 2016.2018:

  Base Salary  Target Annual
Incentive Level

Name

  2016  2017    Increase    2016  2017    Increase  

W. Anthony Will

 $1,150,000 $1,150,000    0%   135% 135%   0% 

Dennis P. Kelleher

 $625,000 $625,000    0%   90% 90%   0% 

Douglas C. Barnard

 $530,000 $530,000    0%   80% 80%   0% 

Christopher D. Bohn

 $500,000 $500,000    0%   70% 70%   0% 

Bert A. Frost

 $575,000 $575,000    0%   80% 80%   0% 

 

 

 Base Salary

  Target Annual
Incentive Level


 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

 

Name

 2018

2019

Increase

  2018

2019

Increase

 

 

W. Anthony Will

 $1,150,000 $1,150,000 0%     135% 135% 0%  

 

Christopher D. Bohn(1)

 $500,000 $550,000 10%     70% 80% 14%  

 

Douglas C. Barnard

 $530,000 $540,000 2%     80% 80% 0%  

 

Bert A. Frost

 $575,000 $600,000 4%     80% 80% 0%  

 

Susan L. Menzel(2)

  $500,000       70%   

 

Dennis P. Kelleher

 $625,000 $625,000 0%     90% 90% 0%  
(1)
In connection with his appointment as chief financial officer, effective as of September 1, 2019, Mr. Bohn's annual base salary increased from $550,000 to $600,000. His target annual incentive level remained unchanged at 80% of his base salary.
(2)
Ms. Menzel became a named executive officer in 2019. Ms. Menzel's base salary was increased during 2019 to $525,000 following her assumption of additional responsibilities as the executive overseeing information technology. In addition, her target annual incentive level was increased to 75% in connection with her increased responsibilities.

Table of Contents

Approval of Annual Incentive Payments for 20172019

Following the end of 2017, after we and each of the companies in the comparison group for the Relative EBITDA Metric published financial results for 2017,2019, management prepared a report on our level of achievement of the primaryPrimary Metric (Adjusted EBITDA), the threshold gate of behavioral safety performance, and secondary performance metricsthe Secondary Metric (Production of Ammonia Tons) under the short-term incentive plan. For the Relative EBITDA Metric, EBITDA was calculated for usThe compensation and each of the other comparison group companies by taking the component line items from each company's published audited income statement for 2017. For purposes of calculating "adjusted EBITDA" for the eleven companies comprising the comparison group other than us, management reviewed the companies' published financial results and recommended, for the compensation committee's approval in its discretion, adjustments to the EBITDA results calculated for the other companies that were comparable to the adjustments used to calculate our adjusted EBITDA. Financial results of a comparison group company reported in a foreign currency were converted into U.S. dollars for purposes of calculating the Relative EBITDA Metric.

The compensationdevelopment committee reviewed the report and approved final performance results in March 2018.results. Based on the results, the compensation committee determined that each of our named executive officersNEOs earned 126%160.3% of the executive's target opportunity with respect to the executive's annual incentive award for 2017.2019. This result is based on our attainment of Adjusted EBITDA of $856$1,612 million, exceeding the primary EBITDA performance metric. Our attainment of adjusted EBITDA of $965 millionwhich resulted in a payout percentage for the Adjusted EBITDAPrimary Metric of 118%153% and, placed us inafter first achieving the 67th percentile under the Relative EBITDA Metric, equatinggating level of performance of behavioral safety practices goals, our production of 10,246,000 ammonia tons equated to a payout percentage for the Secondary Metric of 150%182%.

Historical Annual Incentive Payments Demonstrate Pay-for-Performance Linkage

As summarized in the joint letter from the chairman of our board and our chief executive officer accompanying this proxy statement, our management team has executed our strategy and operated our business extremely well over the past three years. We have received numerous safety awards, completed the construction and safe start-up of our capacity expansion plants, and maintained industry leading ammonia production capacity utilization. During 2017, we set company production and sales volume records while achieving our lowest 12-month recordable injury rate. Despite these significant accomplishments in operating our assets reliably and safely, our financial results were negatively impacted particularly during 2015 and 2016 as a result of one of the weakest global nitrogen pricing


Table of Contents

environments of the last two decades. Our historical annual incentive payouts to our named executive officers illustrate our pay-for-performance philosophy and alignment with our stockholders.

Year
 Attainment of
Primary EBITDA
Performance Metric
 Secondary Performance Metrics Weighting Percent of
Target
Achieved
 Aggregate Short-
Term Incentive
Award Earned
 

2017

 Yes Adjusted EBITDA 75%  118% 126%

   Relative Adjusted EBITDA Growth 25%  150%   

2016

 

No

 

Adjusted EBITDA
Strategic Objectives

 
50%
50%
  
N/A
  
0

%

2015

 

Yes

 

Return on Net Assets

 
100%
  
88

%
 
88

%

Additional information with respect to the base salaries, grants of annual incentive awards and our resulting cash payments to the named executive officers for 2015, 2016, and 2017 is set forth below under the headings "Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table" and "Executive Compensation—Grants of Plan-based Awards."

2017 LONG-TERM INCENTIVESReview and Approval of 2019 Long-Term Incentives

The compensation and management development committee reviewed our long-term incentive program during 20172018 and granted long-term stock-based incentive awards to our named executive officers.

General ConsiderationsNEOs in January 2019.

During its review of our long-term incentive program, the compensation and management development committee considered the following general factors:

    the use of properly structured long-term incentives in order to align the interests of senior management and stockholders;

    shareholders;
    the advantages and disadvantages of using stock options, shares of restricted stock, RSUs, and/or PRSUs for such purposes;

    and
    the array of available vesting parameters for each type of long-term incentive award and the treatment of death, disability, retirement, resignation, and termination, with or without cause; and

    the accounting for various stock-based incentives under FASB ASC Topic 718 and the tax treatment of such incentive awards under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.cause.

The compensation and management development committee also considered the difficulty in establishing appropriate long-term performance measures for the company, other than stock price appreciation and total stockholdershareholder return (including dividends), given the inherent cyclicality in our industry as well as the pronounced effects of highly volatile commodity prices for raw materials and fertilizer products upon our operating results.

In addition, the compensation and management development committee reviewed a report from Exequity, the committee's outside compensation consultant, regarding competitive market practices with respect to the use of long-term incentives.

The compensation and management development committee considered all of this information in the context of the goals and objectives of our executive compensation plans. As noted above, our long-term incentives focus on enterprise value creation and employee retention. Long-term incentives are provided through annual awards that vest over a period of subsequent years. Our 2014 Equity and Incentive Plan allows the use of stock options, full-value shares, and cash-based awards. Eligibility is extended to executive officers and other key employees. DistributionEligibility guidelines with award ranges related to position responsibility


Table of Contents

responsibilities levels are updated annually. In consideration of these guidelines, there is individual variation in long-term incentives based on performance level, potential contribution, and value to the business. Additional information regarding these goals and objectives is set forth above under the headings "Compensation Philosophy" and "Components


Table of Compensation."Contents

Design of Target Awards for 20172019

Based on its review of these general, company-specific, and competitive considerations, the compensation and management development committee determined that, consistent with 2018, the long-term incentive awards granted to our named executive officers in connection with setting the officers' target compensationNEOs for 20172019 would be composed of 60% stock options, 20% RSUsPRSUs and 20% PRSUs.40% RSUs. In selecting a mixture of stock options,PRSUs and RSUs and PRSUs for our target long-term incentive awards, the compensation and management development committee noted that:

    theRSU and PRSU awards that vest solely based on the company's relative total shareholder return ("TSR") further alignsalign the executive officers' interests with those of shareholders;

    the stock option award would provide potential value for executive officers that is tied solely to stock price appreciation after the date of grant;

    the RSU and PRSU awards would provide value for executive officers that fluctuates with total stockholdershareholder return (including dividends);

    the stock option, RSU and PRSU awards would foster stock ownership by executive officers; and

    the stock option and RSU awards would beare subject to time vesting provisions and therefore create an additional retention mechanism for executive officers.

In orderThe compensation and management development committee also approved the metrics used for measuring performance with respect to further align pay deliverythe PRSUs granted in 2019:

    Return on net assets (RONA) measured over three one-year periods (with payouts determined based on the average of the three years); and
    TSR modifier adjusting the number of shares earned based on RONA up or down by 20% based on our three-year TSR performance against a threshold, target and maximum level of performance.

These metrics are consistent with the metrics measured for the PRSUs granted in 2018 and reflect the committee's view that RONA serves as an indicator of the results of management's operating decisions and its expected correlation with long-term TSR performance.

The target TSR performance andlevel for the modifier in the 2019 PRSUs was set to reflect trends in executive compensation generally, beginning with 2018 grantsa compound annual TSR equal to 7%, which is the approximate average annual real total return for the named executive officers,S&P 500 Index since inception. Maximum performance was set at a level well above the average, and threshold performance was set at a level below which a maximum reduction was appropriate.

In structuring the TSR modifier, the compensation and management development committee increaseddetermined not to use a relative TSR benchmark because there are not enough similarly sized companies with comparable business lines from which the committee could assemble a peer group for meaningful TSR performance purposes, and the committee considered that basing the TSR modifier on a broad market comparison (e.g., the S&P 500) over a three-year period would not be appropriate given the pronounced cyclicality of our business.


Table of Contents

How We Determine the Number of PRSUs Earned

The number of PRSUs earned is determined based the company's average RONA performance over three one-year periods and subject to a three-year TSR modifier, as follows:

    At the beginning of each year (e.g., 2019, 2020, and 2021) during the three-year performance period, the compensation and management development committee establishes RONA performance levels for that year and the corresponding percentage payout of the target number of PRSUs based on our performance.
    The threshold, target and maximum performance levels that are set will result in a payout percentage ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of PRSUs. RONA performance levels below the threshold performance level have a payout percentage of 0%.
    Following the completion of each fiscal year, the compensation and management development committee will determine the payout percentage that was attained for such year and following the completion of the third fiscal year, the committee will determine the 3-year average payout percentage attained for the three-year performance period. For fiscal 2019, our actual RONA performance of 17.0% resulted in a 184% payout percentage. Our 2019 RONA target of 13.7% was higher than our 2018 RONA target of 8.2% and higher than our 2018 actual RONA of 13.6%.
    Once the total award value allocatednumber of PRSUs earned based on our RONA performance is determined at the end of the third year, the total is multiplied by a percentage ranging from 80% to 120% depending on our TSR performance for the three-year performance period.
    The combined impact of these performance criteria is that the final payout percentages range from 0% to 240% of target PRSUs.

The number of PRSUs to 60%, increasedearned at the percentage allocated to RSUs to 40%end of the three-year performance period will be determined as follows for the 2018 and eliminated stock option awards as described below under the heading "2018 Compensation."2019 PRSU awards:

GRAPHIC

(1)
The TSR Modifier Percentage is determined in accordance with the following table:
TSR Performance Level
TSR Modifier
Percentage

Threshold: Less than 15.5%

80%

Target: 22.5%

100%

Max: At or Above 29.5%

120%

Table of Contents

Approval of Target Awards for 20172019

On March 3, 2017,January 2, 2019, the compensation and management development committee approved long-term incentive awards for our named executive officers in connection with setting the officers' target compensationNEOs for 20172019 as set forth in the table below:below.

Name
 Stock
Options
 Grant
Value of
Stock
Options
 Time
Vesting
RSUs
 Grant
Value of
Time
Vesting
RSU
 Target
PRSUs
 Grant
Value of
PRSUs
 Total
Grant Value
of Target
LTI Grants
 

W. Anthony Will

  415,140 $3,180,000  34,250 $1,060,000  23,360 $1,060,000 $5,300,000 

Dennis P. Kelleher

  117,490 $900,000  9,695 $300,000  6,610 $300,000 $1,500,000 

Douglas C. Barnard

  78,330 $600,000  6,460 $200,000  4,410 $200,000 $1,000,000 

Christopher D. Bohn

  66,580 $510,000  5,490 $170,000  3,750 $170,000 $850,000 

Bert A. Frost

  90,080 $690,000  7,430 $230,000  5,070 $230,000 $1,150,000 
    Target Performance RSUs

  Time Vesting RSUs

  Total
Target
Grant



 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Name Number

Grant Value

  Number

Grant Value

  Value

 
  W. Anthony Will 84,461 $3,540,000     56,307 $2,360,000     $5,900,000  
  Christopher D. Bohn 17,178 $720,000     11,452 $480,000     $1,200,000  
  Douglas C. Barnard 15,747 $660,000     10,498 $440,000     $1,100,000  
���
  Bert A. Frost 20,042 $840,000     13,361 $560,000     $1,400,000  
  Susan L. Menzel 10,737 $450,000     7,158 $300,000     $750,000  
  Dennis P. Kelleher 19,326 $810,000     12,884 $540,000     $1,350,000  

On the grant date, the compensation and management development committee approved dollar-denominated stock option, RSU and PRSU awards for each of our individual named executive officers.NEOs. In setting the dollar-denominated values of the individual awards, the committee considered our Industry Reference Group and the competitive general industry survey data presented by Exequity, the committee's outside compensation consultant.

The committee also considered the recommendations from our chief executive officer for the long-term incentive awards to each of the named executive officersNEOs other than himself. These recommendations took into account the chief executive officer's assessment


Table of Contents

    of each individual's operating responsibilities, management level, tenure and performance in the position, and potential.

After the close of business on the grant date, the dollar-denominated awards were translated into an actual number of stock options, RSUs and PRSUs using that day's closing price for our stock on the NYSE as the input to valuation formulas recommended by the outside compensation consultant and approved in advance by the compensation committee and, in the case of the PRSUs, a Monte-Carlo simulation. Similarly, the exercise price for the stock options was set to equal that day's closing price. The number of stock options represented 60% of the total value on the grant date, the number of RSUs represented 20% and the number of PRSUs represented the remaining 20%.

Supplemental Performance Alignment Awards

In addition to the long-term incentive awards granted to our named executive officers in connection with setting the officers' target compensation for 2017 as set forth in the table above, on March 3, 2017 the compensation committee approved additional RSUs as a supplemental performance alignment award for our named executive officers as set forth in the table below:

 
 Supplemental
Performance
Alignment Award
 Grant Value of
Supplemental
Award as a % of:
 
Name
 No. of
RSUs
 Grant
Value
 Base
Salary
 Total Grant Value
of Target LTI
Grants
 

W. Anthony Will

  25,850 $800,000  70% 15%

Dennis P. Kelleher

  9,695 $300,000  48% 20%

Douglas C. Barnard

  7,270 $225,000  42% 23%

Christopher D. Bohn

  6,460 $200,000  40% 24%

Bert A. Frost

  8,080 $250,000  43% 22%
In setting the dollar-denominated values of the individual supplemental performance alignment awards based on the compensation committee's business judgment and experience, the committee considered its assessment of each of our named executive officers' performance and potential and the importance of retaining each of the named executive officers, particularly at the time the company's new capacity expansion plants would all be operating at capacity; a review of the officers' existing base salaries, target annual incentive levels, and actual annual incentive payouts; and accumulated vested and unvested awards. In particular, the compensation committee noted that, at the time it made its decision, despite strong operating performance, our financial results and stock performance during 2015 and 2016 were negatively impacted as a result of one of the weakest global nitrogen pricing environments of the last two decades. This stock performance resulted, at the time, in all vested and unvested stock options awarded to the named executive officers in the prior five years (which represented 60% of the total grant value of the officer's long-term incentives in each of those years) being out-of-the-money, although the committee acknowledged that stock options still have real value prior to their 10 year expiration; the PRSUs granted to the officers in 2014 for which the three-year performance period ended on December 31, 2016 resulting in no payout; and the PRSUs granted in 2015 and in 2016 performing below the threshold level required to receive any payout (as described below, the awards granted in 2015 for which the performance period ended December 31, 2017 resulted in no payout). The compensation committee also consulted with Exequity and considered the recommendations from our chief executive officer with respect to each of the named executive officers other than himself, which took into account the chief executive officer's assessment of each individual's operating responsibilities, management level, tenure and performance in the position, and potential.

Table of Contents

After the close of business on the grant date, the dollar-denominated value of the supplemental awards was added to the dollar-denominated value of the RSUs granted to our named executive officers in connection with setting the officers' target compensation for 2017 and the aggregate amountwere translated into an actual number of RSUs and PRSUs using that day'sthe unweighted average of the NYSE closing price for our stockthe twenty (20) trading days preceding the grant date. The number of PRSUs represented 60% of the total value on the NYSE.
grant date and the number of RSUs represented 40%.

Target Values versus Accounting Values

Because of the accounting rules governing preparation of the Summary Compensation Table on 73, the grant date value for RSUs and PRSUs awarded in 2019 as reported in the Summary Compensation Table are different than the target award values set forth in the table above. As discussed above, the compensation and management development committee approves dollar-denominated target award values, which are translated into an actual number of RSUs and PRSUs using the unweighted average of the NYSE closing price for the twenty (20) trading days preceding the grant date.

With respect to RSUs, the values reflected in the Summary Compensation Table are computed as the product of the number of RSUs awarded multiplied by the closing stock price on the date of grant.

As described above with respect to PRSUs, at the beginning of each year of the PRSUs' three-year performance period, the compensation and management development committee establishes RONA performance levels for such year. The target grant values set forth in the table above reflect the value of the entire 2019 PRSUs, without regard for when the performance goals are established.


Table of Contents

Under the applicable accounting rules, the Summary Compensation Table only reflects the value of grants made during the year for which applicable performance goals have been set. With respect to the 2019 PRSUs, only the RONA performance goals for the 2019 fiscal year, the first of three one-year periods, were approved at the time the PRSUs were awarded in 2019. As a result, for the 2019 PRSUs, the Summary Compensation Table does not include the value of the PRSUs based on the annual RONA goals for fiscal 2020 or fiscal 2021. Such amounts will be included as equity compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021, respectively, when the RONA goals are established. With respect to the 2018 PRSUs, the RONA performance goals for the 2019 fiscal year, the second of three one-year periods, were also approved in 2019. As a result, for the 2018 PRSUs, the Summary Compensation Table also includes the value of the 2018 PRSUs based on the annual RONA goals for the 2019 fiscal year.

Vesting and Other Terms of RSUs and Conditions of 2017 Long-term Incentive AwardsPRSUs

The terms and conditions of the long-term incentive awardstarget RSUs granted to our NEOs in 2017 were as follows:

Subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting (as described below), the stock options granted during 20172019 will generally become exercisablevest in three equal annual installments following the date of grant, and will expire ten years from the date of grant.

The target and supplemental RSUs granted to our named executive officers will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting (as described below). Until vested, the RSUs may not be sold, assigned, transferred, donated, pledged, or otherwise disposed of (except by will or the laws of descent and distribution). TheAt the vesting dates, the RSUs give the holder the right to receive sharesone share of common stock at the time of vesting, equalwith respect to the number of RSUs subject to the grant.each vested RSU. We will pay dividend equivalents in cash with respect to the RSUs to our named executive officersNEOs during the vesting period.

The PRSUs granted to our named executive officersNEOs in 2019 will vest onupon the third anniversarycertification by the compensation and management development committee of the grant date, subject to the attainment of the performance goals forfollowing the end of the three-year performance period, and subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting (as described below). The PRSUs are settled in shares of our common stock, the number of which is determined based on the company's three-year TSR as compared to the TSR of companies in the S&P 500 Index, with 50%, 100% or 200% of the target number of shares to be delivered based on achieving threshold (i.e., at least 25th percentile ranking among the companies in the S&P 500 Index), target (i.e., at least 50th percentile ranking) and maximum (i.e., at least 75th percentile ranking) performance levels, respectively, and may be increased or decreased by up to 20% (subject to a cap of 220% of the target number of shares) based on the company's TSR relative to a comparator group comprised of the 18 companies in our Industry Reference Group. For companies in the comparator group, share prices are determined based on the primary U.S. stock exchange or, if not traded on a U.S. stock exchange, the primary foreign stock exchange on which the stock is actively traded. Any stock prices from foreign stock exchanges and all dividends paid in foreign currency are converted into U.S. dollars for purposes of calculating total shareholder return.stock. The PRSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the performance and vesting period. Upon vesting, holders of PRSUs will be paid a cash equivalent of the dividends paid on our common stock during the performance and vesting period based on the number of shares of stock, if any, delivered in settlement of the PRSUs.

As discussed below under the heading "Change in Control, Severance, and Retirement Benefits," upon a change in control, the restrictions, limitations, and conditions applicable to the stock options, RSUs and PRSUs will lapse, the performance goals with respect to the PRSUs will be deemed fully achieved at the greater of target or actual performance to-date, and all of the awards will become fully vested and exercisable.vested. Upon death or disability, stock options and RSUs become fully vested and, in the case of stock options, exercisable and the PRSUs become fully vested at the target level of performance.

As discussed below under The RSUs and PRSUs will vest on a pro rata basis upon retirement in the heading "Change in Control, Severance, and Retirement Benefits," forcase of those named executive officersNEOs who have reached the age of 60 with at least five years of service at the time of retirement including our named executive officers, certain equity awards will be subject to continued vesting and exercisability.
who provide us with at least six months' notice.

Additional information with respect to the compensation and management development committee's grants of stock options, RSUs and PRSUs to our named executive officersNEOs during 20172019 is set forth below under the heading "Executive Compensation—Grants of Plan-based Awards."


Table of Contents

Determination of 2015-20172017-2019 Performance Period PRSU Awards

The three-year performance period for PRSU awards granted in 20152017 ended on December 31, 2017.2019. The performance metrics for PRSUs granted in 20152017 were our three-year TSR compared against the S&P 500 Index and a modifier pursuant to which the number of shares earned based on our TSR relative to the S&P 500 Index could be increased or decreased by up to 20% based on our TSR compared againstrelative to a select fertilizer peercomparator group comprised of Agrium Inc., CVR Partners LP, Incitec Pivot Ltd, LSB Industries, Inc., The Mosaic Company, Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc., and Yara International ASA.the 18 companies that were in our industry reference group in 2017. Our stock performance during 2015 and 2016 was negatively impacted as a result of one of the weakest global nitrogen pricing environments of the last two decades. Despite a TSR of 39% for 2017, our final TSR for the three-year period of 69.5% was atabove the 10th percentile of the S&P 500 Index. Our TSR ranked 4th out of the eight companies (including us) in the select fertilizer peer group used as a modifier. In accordance with our pay-for-performance philosophy, because our TSR performance over this three-year period did not achieve at least the 25th75th percentile of the S&P 500 Index the award resulted in no payout and no dividend equivalents.

The PRSUs granted to our named executive officers in 2014 for which the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2016 also resulted in no payout and no dividend equivalents. Despite a TSR of 19% for 2014, the negative impact on our stock performance during 2015 and 2016 from the weak global nitrogen pricing environment resulted in our final TSR for the three-year period falling below the threshold level of performance for those awards.

As a result, the following PRSUs that were granted to the named executive officers (other than Mr. Bohn whose first year as a named executive officer was 2016) for (i) the 2014-2016 performance period and the associated grant values originally shown in the 2015 proxy statement and (ii) the 2015-2017 performance periods and the associated grant values originally shown in the 2016 proxy statement and included in the 2015 Stock Award value shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 64 were not realized by our named executive officers:

 
 Original 2014
PRSU Grant
  
  
  
 Original 2015
PRSU Grant
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
 Vested PRSUs /
Compensation
Realized from
2014 PRSU Award
  
  
 Vested PRSUs /
Compensation
Realized from
2015 PRSU Award
  
 
 # of Shares
at Target
 Value at
Grant
  
  
 # of Shares
at Target
 Value at
Grant
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Name
  
  
  
  

W. Anthony Will

  6,450 $500,817   $0    7,680 $699,863   $0�� 

Dennis P. Kelleher

  3,100 $240,703   $0    2,415 $220,074   $0  

Douglas C. Barnard

  2,575 $199,938   $0    1,645 $149,906   $0  

Bert A. Frost

  3,350 $260,114   $0    1,865 $169,954   $0  

2018 COMPENSATION

The compensation committee recently approved base salaries, target annual incentive awards, and long-term stock-based incentive awards for our named executive officers for calendar year 2018. In setting compensation levels for 2018, the compensation committee considered a competitive market assessment performed by Exequity, the committee's outside compensation consultant, and the goals and objectives of our executive compensation plans. The compensation committee made the decision that our named executive officers' base salaries and target annual incentive awards for 2018 would remain unchanged from those in effect for 2016 and 2017 due to target compensation continuing to be in line with our Industry Reference Group and the overall general industry survey data and in recognition of industry market conditions at the time. With respect to long-term incentive awards, in order to further align pay delivery with long-term performance and to reflect trends in executive compensation generally, beginning with 2018 grants for named executive officers, the compensation committee increased the percentageranked 3rd out of the total award value allocated to PRSUs to 60%, increased the percentage


Table of Contents

allocated to RSUs to 40% and eliminated stock option awards. The table below showsseventeen companies (including us) in the base salaries, target annual incentives, and long-term incentivecomparator group used as a modifier. As a result, in accordance with the terms of the awards, for our named executive officers for 2018.the committee approved a payout of 220% of the PRSUs from these grants.

Name
 Base Salary Target Annual
Incentive Level
 Target PRSUs Time Vesting
RSUs
 

W. Anthony Will

 $1,150,000  135% 78,889  52,592 

Dennis P. Kelleher

 $625,000  90% 19,350  12,900 

Douglas C. Barnard

 $530,000  80% 14,885  9,923 

Christopher D. Bohn

 $500,000  70% 14,885  9,923 

Bert A. Frost

 $575,000  80% 19,350  12,900 
   
Original 2017 PRSU Grant

  
PRSUs Earned

 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Name(1) 
Target #

Value at Grant

  
#

Value(2)

 
  W. Anthony Will  23,360 $1,060,000      51,392 $1,960,091  
  Christopher D. Bohn  3,750 $170,000      8,250 $314,655  
  Douglas C. Barnard  4,410 $200,000      9,702 $370,034  
  Bert A. Frost  5,070 $230,000      11,154 $425,414  
  Dennis P. Kelleher  6,610 $300,000      14,542 $554,632  
(1)
Ms. Menzel was not an employee of the company at the time the 2017 PRSUs were granted and therefore was not granted any PRSUs in 2017.

(2)
This column represents the value of the shares earned based on a stock price of $38.14, which was the closing price on the last trading day prior to the vesting date of March 3, 2020.

Performance Metrics for Annual Incentive Payments for 2018Historical Payout of PRSUs

The compensation committee determined thatFrom 2014 until the annual incentive awardsgrants in 2018, the PRSUs granted to our named executive officers for 2018 will bevested solely based in the first instance, on attainment of a primary overall EBITDA performance metric of $300 million for the company's 2018 fiscal year. If that primary EBITDArelative total shareholder return over a three year performance metric is attained, actual annual incentive payments will be determined byperiod compared against the compensation committee using its negative discretion authority based upon our level of achievement of the following secondary performance metrics:

75% of each executive's annual incentive payment opportunity is based upon our level of achievement of adjusted EBITDA for 2018 (the "Financial Metric"); and

the remaining 25% is based upon our level of achievement of specified ammonia production goals, subject to first achieving a gating level of performance of behavioral safety practices goals (the "Operational Metric").

The compensation committee established the following performance levels and corresponding percentages of target opportunity earned with respect to the Financial Metric for 2018:









Performance Level

Adjusted EBITDA Achieved

Percentage of Target
Short-Term Incentive
Award Earned


​  

Below Threshold

Less than $600 Million0%

Threshold

$600 Million50%

​  

Target

$825 Million100%

Ceiling

$1.25 Billion200%

Straight line interpolation is used to determine the achievement percentage for the Financial Metric between threshold and target and between target and ceiling performance levels.

For the Operational Metric, each of our production and distribution facilities develops and implements specific behavioral safety objectives that are pertinent and meaningful to each work group at the site. Each employee is involved in developing and taking ownership for completing objectives that make their workplace safer and effect a positive change in the safety culture. Each quarter, evaluations are conducted and an overall achievement grade (A through F) for each hourly group and individual manager is assigned. Under the Operational Metric, the quarterly grades issued to all site employees will be aggregated. If at least 95% of the grades are "B" or better for the year, the safety performance gating requirement will be achieved. If the safety performance gating requirement is not achieved, there will be no payout under the Operational Metric. If the safety performance gating requirement is achieved, the payout under the Operational Metric will be determined based upon our level of production of ammonia product tons. Similar to the Financial Metric, threshold, target and ceiling performance levels were set that will result in corresponding payouts of 0% to 200% of the target


Table of Contents

incentive amount for the Operational Metric. Target performance was set at a level consistent with corporate forecasts. Ceiling performance was set at a level judged to be difficult to achieve and threshold performance was set at the lowest level that would justify a payout. The compensation committee retains discretion to adjust the performance levels to address circumstances that impact our ability to meet production expectations, such as market-based curtailments, severe weather events or other events of force majeure that result in production outages, and other adjustments approved by the compensation committee.

2018 Long-Term Incentives

The compensation committee reviewed our long-term incentive program during the fourth quarter of 2017 and, on January 2, 2018, granted long-term incentive awards to each of our named executive officers as set forth in the table above. For 2018, the compensation committee determined that stock options would not be awarded and that the long-term incentive awards to our named executive officers should be composed 60% in PRSUs and 40% in RSUs. This change was made to further align pay delivery with long-term performance and to reflect trends in executive compensation generally.

On the grant date, the compensation committee approved dollar-denominated PRSU and RSU award values for each of our individual named executive officers. The grant values were translated into an actual number of target PRSUs and RSUs by dividing the award values by the unweighted average closing price of our stock on the NYSE for the twenty trading days preceding the grant date. Subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting, the time-vesting RSUs granted in 2018 will vest in three equal annual installments following the date of grant and the PRSUs will vest upon the certification by the compensation committee of the attainment of the performance goals following the end of the three-year performance period. The compensation committee will certify the extent, if any, to which the PRSU performance goals have been attained no later than the last day of the fiscal quarter immediately following the three-year performance period.

Beginning with the 2018 grants, the compensation committee also modified the performance metrics to two new measures: average return on net assets ("RONA") over three one-year periodsS&P 500 Index and a modifier pursuant to which the number of shares earned based on RONA performance mayour TSR relative to the S&P 500 could be increased or decreased by up to 20% based on our three-year TSR performancecompared against a threshold, target, and ceiling level of performance.

Atpeer group. The table below shows the beginning of each year (e.g., 2018, 2019, and 2020) during the three-year performance period, the compensation committee will establish RONA performance levels for that year and the corresponding percentage payout of the target numberthree-year PRSUs granted in each of 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. For the PRSUs based on our performance. The threshold,granted in 2014 and 2015, the compensation realized was 0% and for all four years (2014-2017) of PRSU grants, the average percentage payout was 69%, compared to a target and ceiling performance levels that are set will result in a payout percentage rangingof 100%.


Percentage Payout of 3-Year PRSUs
granted from 0% to 200%2014-2017

GRAPHIC

These results are indicative of the target number of PRSUs. Following the completion of each fiscal year, the compensation committee will determine the payout percentage that was attained for such year and following the completion of the third fiscal year, the committee will determine the average payout percentage attaineddifficulty in establishing appropriate long-term performance measures for the three-year period. The PRSUs will be settledcompany, other than stock price appreciation and total shareholder return (including dividends), given the inherent cyclicality in sharesour industry as well as the pronounced effects of our common stock. Once the total number of shares earned based on our RONA performance is determined at the end of the third year, the total is multiplied by a percentage ranging from 80% to 120% depending on our TSR performancehighly volatile commodity prices for the three-year performance period. The combined impact of these performance criteria is that shares could be earned under the PRSUs ranging from 0% to 240% of target.raw materials and fertilizer products upon our


Table of Contents

operating results. As described above under the heading "—Review and Approval of 2019 Long-Term Incentives" the committee changed the performance metrics for the PRSUs granted in 2018 and 2019 to RONA measured over three one-year periods (with payouts determined based on the average of the three years) and a TSR modifier. The compensation committee established the following performance levels and corresponding percentage payouts of target shares with respect to the RONA performance metric for 2018 and the following TSR performance levels and corresponding percentages for the three-year TSR modifier:

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 Performance Level
  
 2018 RONA
Achieved

  
 Payout
Percentage

  
 Three-Year
TSR Achieved

  
 TSR Modifier
Percentage

  

​  

 

Below Threshold

  Less than 5.9%  0%    

 

 

Threshold

   5.9%    50%  Less than 15.5%    80% 

​  

 

Target

  8.2%  100% 22.5%  100%

 

 

Ceiling

   At or above 12.4%    200%  At or above 29.5%    120% 

Straight line interpolation is used to determine the applicable percentage between threshold and target and between target and ceiling performance levels.

The compensationmanagement development committee added RONA as a performance metric for PRSUs because of its expected correlation with long-term TSR performance and the view that it serves as an indicator of the results of management's operating decisions.

2020 Compensation Actions

In deciding to measure RONA annually for three years against annual targets,December 2019, the compensation and management development committee approved base salaries and target annual incentive awards for our NEOs for calendar year 2020. In addition, on January 2, 2020, the compensation and management development committee approved long-term incentive awards for our NEOs for 2020. In setting compensation levels for 2020, the compensation and management development committee considered a competitive market assessment performed by Exequity, the difficulty in establishing appropriatecommittee's outside compensation consultant, and the goals and objectives of our executive compensation plans. The following table shows the base salaries, target annual incentives, and long-term performance measuresincentive awards for the company given the inherent cyclicality in our industry as well as the pronounced effects of highly volatile commodity pricesnamed executive officers (other than Mr. Kelleher, who retired effective September 1, 2019) for raw materials and fertilizer products2020.

​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
  Name Base Salary

Target Annual
Incentive Level




Target
PRSUs



RSUs

 
  W. Anthony Will $1,250,000 135%  77,769  51,846  
  Christopher D. Bohn $625,000 80%  16,850  11,233  
  Douglas C. Barnard $565,000 80%  14,258  9,505  
  Bert A. Frost $625,000 80%  18,146  12,097  
  Susan L. Menzel $525,000 75%  10,369  6,913  

Performance Metrics for Annual Incentive Payments for 2020

The annual incentive awards to our NEOs for 2020 will again be determined based upon our operating results. Target RONAlevel of achievement of the following performance for 2018 was set at ametrics:

    75% of each executive's annual incentive payment opportunity is based upon our level consistent with corporate forecasts. Ceiling performance was set at a level judged to be difficult to achieve and threshold performance was set at the lowest level that would justify a payout.

    RONA is determined by reference to the ratio (expressed as a percentage)of achievement of adjusted EBITDA (as defined for purposes2020; and

    the remaining 25% is based upon our level of achievement of specified ammonia production goals, subject to first achieving a gating level of performance of behavioral safety practices goals.

These two performance metrics are unchanged from our 2018 and 2019 annual incentive plan) divided by average operational assets.program. The "average operational assets" denominatorperformance levels and corresponding percentages of this metric is essentiallytarget opportunity earned with respect to the simple average of the beginning and year-end values forthe sum of (i) total assetsless (ii) cash and cash equivalentsless (iii) restricted cashless (iv) short-term investmentsless (v) investments in marketable equity securitiesless (vi) prepaid income taxesless (vii) total current liabilitiesless (viii) long-term deferred income taxesless (ix) other noncurrent liabilitiesless (x) assets associated with major capital projects (as approved2020 performance metrics established by the compensation committee)less (xi) net assets associated with acquisitions and divestitures completed during the yearplus (xii) short-term debt or notes payable included in current liabilities.

In determining to set threshold, target, and ceiling levels of TSR performance for the TSR modifier in lieu of a relative TSR metric, the compensationmanagement development committee considered there are not enough companies with market capitalizations and revenues comparable to ours and with lines of business similar to ours to assemble a sizeable peer group. In addition, the compensation committee considered that the cyclicality of our business resultswill be disclosed in the S&P 500 Index not being an appropriate comparatorproxy statement for our stock price performance. This is evidenced by the results of the2021 annual meeting.

Performance Metrics for PRSUs granted prior to 2018 either (i) ending (in the case of the PRSU grantedGranted in 2014 and 2015) or currently performing (in the case of2020

The performance metrics for the PRSUs granted in 2016) below2020 are structured in the threshold level of performance or (ii) performing above the ceiling level of performance (in the case ofsame manner as the PRSUs granted in 2017).2018 and 2019. The targetnumber of PRSUs earned under the PRSUs granted in 2020 will be determined based on the company's average RONA performance over three one-year periods and subject to a three-year TSR modifier. The RONA performance levellevels for fiscal 2020 and corresponding payout percentages for the modifier inyear established by the 2018 PRSUs was set to reflect a compound annual TSR equal to 7%, which is the approximate average annual real total return for the S&P 500 Index since inception. Ceiling performance was set at a level well above the average, and threshold performance was set at a level below which a maximum reduction was appropriate.


Table of Contents

compensation and management development committee will be disclosed in the proxy statement for our 2021 annual meeting.

CHANGE IN CONTROL, SEVERANCE, AND RETIREMENT BENEFITSChange in Control, Severance, and Retirement Benefits

The compensation and management development committee reviewed our change in control, severance, and retirement benefits during 20172019 as described below. Based on its review, and after considering the factors noted below, the compensation and management development committee determined that our change in control, severance, and retirement benefits continue to serve the best interests of the company and our stockholdersshareholders and are consistent with competitive market practices.

Change in Control Benefits

With respect to our change in control benefits, the compensation and management development committee noted that we have change in control agreements with our executive officers, as well as certain change in control benefits for all of the participants (including the executive officers) under our 2009 Equity and Incentive Plan and 2014 Equity and Incentive Plan. Additional information regarding these benefits is set forth below under the heading "Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control."

In connection with its review, the compensation and management development committee noted that the change in control agreements with our executive officers are:

    intendedIntended to provide some level of income continuity for an executive officer should his or her employment be terminated by us without cause or by him or her for good reason in connection with a change in control;

    designedDesigned to avoid unwanted management turnover in the event of a potential change in control; and

    designedDesigned to ensure that the executive officer's personal interests will remain aligned with the interests of our stockholdersshareholders in the event of a potential change in control.

The compensation and management development committee also noted that our change in control agreements require both (i) a change in control and (ii) a qualifying termination of the executive officer's employment (sometimes referred to as a "double trigger"), before any benefits will be owing to the executive officer under the agreement.

In addition, the compensation and management development committee noted that our 2009 Equity and Incentive Plan and 2014 Equity and Incentive Plan provide that all plan-based awards will be deemed fully vested and fully exercisable and any performance conditions will be deemed fully achieved upon a change in control (sometimes referred to as a "single trigger"), unless the committee determines otherwise with respect to a particular award at the time of grant and reflects this determination in the applicable award agreement. In this regard, the compensation and management development committee noted it would be difficult to preserve the original performance and vesting goals in our plan-based awards following a change in control, given the fundamental changes in our organization, capital structure, and operations that would typically result from such a transaction. Accordingly, all of our plan-based awards have included this change in control provision for the benefit of our executive officers and the other participants.

As part of its review, the compensation and management development committee reviewed "tally sheets," estimating these benefits for our chief executive officer and the other named executive officersNEOs under various assumptions and scenarios.


Table of Contents

Based on its review, and the other factors noted above, the compensation and management development committee determined that our change in control benefits serve the best interests of the company and our stockholdersshareholders and are consistent with competitive market practices.


Table of Contents

Excise Tax Gross-Ups

In December 2014, the Board adopted a policy whereby the company will not in the future enter into any new agreements with its named executive officersNEOs that include Internal Revenue Code Section 280G excise tax "gross-up" provisions with respect to payments contingent on a change in control of the company.

Severance Benefits

With respect to our severance benefits, the compensation and management development committee noted that none of our executive officers has any employment or severance agreement, and none of our executive officers is entitled to receive any other severance benefits, except for (i) the change in control agreements and change in control benefits discussed above, (ii) such severance benefits as we may provide under our standard policies applicable to all employees, (iii) such severance benefits as we may be required to pay under applicable law in certain jurisdictions, and (iv) such additional severance benefits as our compensation and management development committee may approve in certain instances. Based on its review, and the other factors noted above, the compensation and management development committee determined that our severance benefits serve the best interests of the company and our stockholdersshareholders and are consistent with competitive market practices.

Retirement Benefits

With respect to our retirement benefits, the compensation and management development committee noted that we maintain tax-qualified and nonqualified defined benefit, defined contribution, and deferred compensation plans. Additional information regarding these benefits is set forth below under the headings "Executive Compensation—Pension Benefits" and "Executive Compensation—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation."

We maintain a defined benefit pension plan named the CF Industries Holdings, Inc. Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan"). The Pension Plan includes three components. Supplement A of the Pension Plan, which we refer to herein as the New Retirement Plan, is a defined benefit pension plan that became effective on January 1, 2013, under which all domestic employees (including executive officers) became eligible to participate as of January 1, 2013, except for those employees who participate in Supplement B of the Pension Plan. Supplement B of the Pension Plan is our historic defined benefit pension plan, which we refer to herein as the Old Retirement Plan and which was closed to new participants on December 31, 2003. Employees who joined the company after that date, which includes all of the named executive officers,NEOs, are ineligible to receive any pension benefits under the Old Retirement Plan, but are eligible for benefits under the New Retirement Plan. Under the New Retirement Plan, we credit the account of each participating employee an amount between 4% and 7% (depending on years of service) of the participant's eligible compensation. For our named executive officers,NEOs, eligible compensation is limited to base salary. Each participant's account will earn an annual return based on the greater of (i) the annual yield on 10-year treasury nominal securities and (ii) 3% annual interest. The third component of the Pension Plan is Supplement C, which was formerly known as the Terra Industries Inc. Employees' Retirement Plan and covers employees who commenced employment with Terra Industries, or any other entity that was an employer under the former plan, prior to August 1, 2003. None of our NEOs are participants in Supplement C of the Pension Plan.


Table of Contents

The compensation and management development committee also reviewed "tally sheets," estimating these benefits for our chief executive officer and the other named executive officersNEOs under various assumptions and scenarios.

Commencing with equity grants made in 2014, employees, including our named executive officers,NEOs, who retire upon having reached age 60 with at least five years of service at the time of retirement will continue to vest in their stock option awards that were granted at least one year prior to their termination date and will receive a pro-rated number of RSUs and PRSUs based on their length of service between the grant date of such award and the executive's retirement date and, with respect to


Table of Contents

PRSUs, contingent upon the level of attainment of applicable performance goals, provided, that, in each case, the executive has provided us with at least six months' notice prior to such retirement. In addition, such eligible retirees will have four years from their retirement date to exercise any vested options.

Based on its review, and the other factors noted above, the compensation and management development committee determined that our retirement benefits serve the best interests of the company and our stockholdersshareholders and are consistent with competitive market practices.

COMPENSATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Separation Agreement—Dennis Kelleher

The compensation committee has taken a number of steps related to reviewing and establishing the compensation of ourOn May 30, 2019, Dennis Kelleher resigned as chief executive officer. Additional information regarding these activities is set forth above under the heading "Compensation Committee Activities."

Short-term Incentive Payment for 2017

The compensation committee recently determined that Mr. Will earned $1,956,200 with respect to his annual incentive award for 2017, representing 126%financial officer of the relevant target based on our attainmentcompany, effective as of adjusted EBITDA of $965 million as described above under the heading "Approval of Annual Incentive Payments for 2017." Additional information with respect to Mr. Will's annual incentive award for 2017 and our subsequent cash payment to him on that award is set forth below under the headings "Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table" and "Executive Compensation—Grants of Plan-based Awards."

Long-term Incentive Target Awards for 2017

The compensation committee granted Mr. Will 415,140 stock options, 34,250 RSUs, and 23,360 target PRSUs inSeptember 1, 2019. In connection with setting his target compensation for 2017. In addition to these awards,Mr. Kelleher's retirement, the compensation committee awardedcompany and Mr. Will an additional 25,850 RSUsKelleher entered into a Transition and Separation Agreement, dated as a supplemental performance alignment award. Additional information regarding the committee's review of our long-term incentive program andMay 30, 2019. For the terms and conditions of our stock option, RSUthe Separation Agreement, including the severance arrangements, treatment of equity awards and PRSU awards for 2017 is set forth above under the heading "2017 Long-term Incentives." Additional information with respect to Mr. Will's long-term incentive awards for 2017 is set forth below under the headings "Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table," "Executive Compensation—Grants of Plan-based Awards" and "Executive Compensation—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End."

Cash Compensation for 2018

The compensation committee recently approved a base salary of $1,150,000 for Mr. Will for 2018 and an annual incentive target equal to 135% of his base salary, which are unchanged from the base salary and annual incentive target in effect for Mr. Will in 2016 and 2017. Additional information regarding the compensation committee's approval of Mr. Will's base salary and his annual incentive target for 2018 is set forth above under the heading "2018 Compensation." In setting Mr. Will's base salary and annual incentive target for 2018, the committee considered (i) a competitive market assessment performed by Exequity, in its role as the compensation committee's outside compensation consultant, (ii) the Board's annual evaluation of Mr. Will's overall performance, and (iii) the goals and objectives of our executive compensation plans. The compensation committee made the decision that Mr. Will's and all of our other named executive officers' base salaries and target annual incentive awards for 2018 would remain unchanged from those in effect for 2016 and 2017 due to target compensation being in line with our Industry Reference Group and the overall general industry survey data and in recognition of current industry market conditions. Mr. Will's 2018 base salary and annual incentive target place him around the median of the peer group companies in our Industry Reference Group and the overall market from the outside compensation consultant's market assessment.


Table of Contents

Short-term Incentive Award for 2018

The compensation committee recently granted Mr. Will an annual incentive award opportunity for 2018. Mr. Will's annual incentive payment for 2018 will be based, in the first instance, on our attaining a primary overall EBITDA performance metric of $300 million for the company's 2018 fiscal year. If the primary EBITDA performance metric is attained, Mr. Will's actual annual incentive payment will be determined by the compensation committee using its negative discretion authority based on our level of achievement of the Financial Metric and the Operational Metric set by the compensation committee as described above under "2018 Compensation—Performance Metrics for Annual Incentive Payments for 2018."

Long-term Incentive Awards for 2018

The compensation committee recently granted Mr. Will 78,889 target PRSUs and 52,592 RSUs for 2018. In making this award, the committee considered a competitive market assessment performed by its outside compensation consultant, Exequity, as well as the other factors discussed above. Additional information regarding the terms and conditions of our PRSU and RSU awards for 2018 is set forth above under the heading "2018 Compensation—2018 Long-Term Incentives."

Change in Control, Severance, and Retirement Benefits

The compensation committee also reviewed our change in control, severance, and retirement benefits during 2017, with a particular focus on the benefits Mr. Will would receive upon such an event now or in the future. As part of its review, the committee reviewed "tally sheets," estimating the benefits that Mr. Will would receive under various assumptions and scenarios. Specifically, Mr. Will's change in control agreement provides that upon a qualifying termination, as described in more detail under the headingrestrictive covenants, see "Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control," he will be entitled to (i) a lump sum payment equal to three times the sum of his base salaryControl—Dennis Kelleher Retirement and target annual incentive payment; (ii) welfare benefit continuation for a period of three years and outplacement services for a period of up to two years; (iii) a pro-rata annual incentive payment for the year of termination, assuming target levels of performance or, if higher, actual year-to-date performance; (iv) a cash payment equal to the actuarial value of three additional years of age and service credit under our New Retirement Plan and our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan; and (v) a cash payment equal to the contributions that we would have made on his behalf for a period of three years under our company 401(k) Plan and the related amounts that we would have credited to his account balance under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan. Mr. Will's change in control agreement does not provide for an excise tax gross-up. The compensation committee determined that Mr. Will's change in control benefits, as set forth in his change in control agreement, and his other severance and retirement benefits, provide for benefits that are consistent with competitive market practices for a chief executive officer and are in the best interests of the company and our stockholders. Additional information regarding Mr. Will's change in control benefits is set forth below under the heading "Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.Separation Agreement." Additional information regarding the compensation committee's activities with respect to such benefits is set forth above under the heading "Change in Control, Severance, and Retirement Benefits."

Additional information with respect to Mr. Will's total compensation and benefits for 2015, 2016, and 2017 is set forth below under the heading "Executive Compensation."


Table of Contents

INDUSTRY REFERENCE GROUPUse of Industry Reference Group

As noted above, the compensation and management development committee has adopted an Industry Reference Group for use in establishing compensation and incentive levels. The compensation and management development committee's consultant, Exequity, leads a review of the companies in the peer group annually and proposes changes based on quantitative and qualitative assessments of comparability. For 2017, the committee revised the Industry Reference Group so that it comprises the following 18 companies:

Global Industry Classification
Standard Subindustry Description
Company Name

Fertilizers and Agricultural Chemicals

Agrium Inc.
The Mosaic Company
Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

Specialty Chemicals

Albemarle Corporation
Ashland Global Holdings, Inc.
Celanese Corporation
Ecolab Inc.
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
PolyOne Corporation
RPM International Inc.

Commodity Chemicals

Cabot Corporation
Westlake Chemical Corporation

Diversified Chemicals

Eastman Chemical Company
FMC Corporation
Huntsman Corporation
Olin Corporation

Industrial Gases

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

For 2016,The only change from our peer group also included Ingredion Incorporated (Agricultural Products). Our compensation committee removed Ingredion Incorporated from the reference group because of a low comparability score under the independent compensation consultant's analysis. For 2017, the compensation committee added six new peer companies to the Industry Reference Group: four new Specialty Chemical companies (Ecolab Inc., International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., PolyOne Corporation, and RPM International Inc.); one Commodity Chemicals company (Cabot Corporation); and one Diversified Chemicals company (Olin Corporation). Each of these companies, along with others, were identified as potential additions to our peer group based on Exequity's quantitative assessment. The companies identified as potential peers were then further reviewed on a qualitative basis to ensure relevance and appropriateness. Each of the six new peers were selected for inclusion in our Industry Reference Group based on their comparability scores from Exequity's analysis. A subset of our2018 Industry Reference Group is included in our "peer group" for purposesthe replacement of the stock price performance graph included within our 2017 Annual Report. We have selected Agrium Inc., The Mosaic Company, (Agrium) and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. for this purpose because for 2017 they comprised(PotashCorp) with Nutrien Ltd., the members of our Industry Reference Group that were publicly traded manufacturers of fertilizers during 2017 with headquarters in North America. Subsequent tocompany formed by the end of 2017, Agrium and Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. consummated a merger of equals transaction to form Nutrien Ltd.January 2,


Table of Contents

FINANCIAL RESTATEMENTS

It is the policy2018 merger of the Board that the compensation committee will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have the soleAgrium and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments to any cash or equity-based incentive compensation paid to executive officers if the payment was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement. Where applicable, we will seek to recover any amount determined to have been received inappropriately by an executive officer.Potash. The compensation committee includes "clawback" language17 companies in our Industry Reference Group for 2019 are listed in the forms of incentive award agreements that we use with executive officers in order to enhance the enforceability of these provisions.following table:

Global Industry Classification
Standard Subindustry Description


Company Name

Fertilizers and Agricultural Chemicals

The Mosaic Company

Nutrien Ltd.

The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

Specialty Chemicals

Albemarle Corporation

Ashland Global Holdings, Inc.

Celanese Corporation

Ecolab Inc.

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

PolyOne Corporation

RPM International Inc.

Commodity Chemicals

Cabot Corporation

Westlake Chemical Corporation

Diversified Chemicals

Eastman Chemical Company

FMC Corporation

Huntsman Corporation

Olin Corporation

Industrial Gases

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINESOther Compensation Governance Practices and Considerations

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The compensation and management development committee has authority under its charter to retain, approve fees for, and terminate advisors, consultants, and agents as it deems necessary to assist in the fulfillment of its responsibilities. Pursuant to this authority, the compensation and management development committee engaged Exequity, an independent executive compensation consulting firm, to assist the committee in making recommendations and decisions regarding compensation for our directors and executive officers based on market and industry practices. Exequity provides no other services to the company.

The compensation consultant regularly attends meetings of our compensation and management development committee and meets regularly with the committee in executive sessions without management present. The compensation and management development committee reviews the materials and recommendations provided by Exequity, but exercises independent judgment in determining the compensation payable to our NEOs. Any recommendations of the compensation and management development committee with respect to non-employee director compensation are subject to approval by the Board.

The compensation and management development committee has determined, after appropriate inquiry, including consideration of Exequity's independence in light of the factors set forth under Rule 10C-1 of the Exchange Act, that no conflicts of interest exist with respect to the firm's engagement as the committee's independent compensation consultant.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board believes that our directors and officers should be stockholdersshareholders of CF Industries and, based on the recommendation of the compensation and management development committee, has established guidelines for stock ownership.


Table of Contents

    Directors will have five years from the date of their appointment or election to achieve stock ownership with a market value equal to five times their annual cash retainer.

    Officers will have five years from their date of hire or promotion to achieve stock ownership with a market value equal to (i) five times annual base salary in the case of the chief executive officer, (ii) two times annual base salary in the case of the other named executive officersNEOs and several other executive officers, and (iii) one times annual base salary in the case of the other officers.

As of December 31, 2019, each of our directors and officers was in compliance with the stock ownership guideline requirements. Their financial interests are aligned with those of our shareholders; they are incentivized to take actions that create sustainable value.

For purposes of these guidelines, any of the following may be used to satisfy the ownership requirements: (i) shares purchased by the individual, (ii) shares retained upon the exercise of a vested stock option, (iii) shares acquired upon the vesting of restricted shares or units, (iv) shares acquired upon the vesting of performance shares or units, (v) shares (including "phantom" shares) held within our qualified and non-qualified deferred compensation and retirement plans, (vi) shares purchased through an employee stock purchase plan, (vii) restricted shares or units, (viii) earned performance shares or units (i.e., shares or units under a performance award for which the primary performance criteria has been achieved, but which remain subject to time-based vesting requirements, without regard to any potential subsequent modification based on additional performance criteria such as a TSR modifier), and (ix) the difference in value between the exercise price and current market price for vested but unexercised options, net of taxes at an assumed maximum tax rate. Non-vested stock options and unearned non-vested performance shares or units are specifically excluded in meeting the ownership requirements.

It is expected that an individual who is subject to the stock ownership guidelines will not sell any shares unless he or she has satisfied the ownership guidelines both before the sale and after giving effect to the shares sold. An individual who has initially satisfied the guidelines but as a result of a subsequent decline in stock prices no longer meets the guidelines is precluded from selling any shares until such time as he or she again satisfies the guidelines. Surrendering shares to the company in order to pay withholding or other taxes on compensation income or pay the exercise price of stock options is not considered a sale of shares for purposes of the guidelines. As of December 31, 2017, each of our directors and officers was in compliance with the stock ownership guideline requirements.

We may facilitate stock ownership by directors and officers through grants of equity-based compensation under our 2014 Equity and Incentive Plan.

Clawback Policy

We have in place an executive compensation recoupment policy, or "clawback" policy, which applies to our executive officers (referred to as "covered officers"), including the NEOs. Under the policy, in the event that the specified financial results upon which a cash or equity-based incentive award was predicated become the subject of a financial restatement that is required because of material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements, the compensation and management development committee will conduct a review of awards covered by the policy and will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have the sole and absolute authority to make adjustments to the awards to ensure that the ultimate payout gives retroactive effect to the financial results as restated, including the authority to seek recoupment of any excess cash or equity that has already been paid to or received by a covered person. The policy covers any cash or equity-based incentive compensation award that was paid, earned or granted to a covered officer during the last completed three fiscal years immediately preceding the date the financial restatement is publicly announced. Our executive


Table of Contents

officers have each signed a form acknowledging the applicability of the policy in order to enhance the enforceability of these provisions.

TRADING, HEDGING AND PLEDGING RESTRICTIONS
Trading, Hedging and Pledging Restrictions

We have a Policy on Insider Trading, which prohibits our directors, officers, and employees from engaging in speculative transactions in our securities. Specifically, it is against our policy to trade in options, warrants, puts and calls, or similar derivatives on our stock, sell our stock "short," or hold our stock in margin accounts. In addition, our policy prohibits our directors and executive officers from pledging our stock as collateral for a loan.

TAX DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation and Benefits Risk Analysis

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code has limited our federal income tax deduction to $1,000,000 per year for compensation paid to our chief executive officer or certain of the other named executive officers, subject to an exemption for performance-based compensation that meets certain requirements. The Tax Act signed into law on December 22, 2017, eliminated that exemption. However, the Tax Act also provided for a transition rule with respect to compensation provided pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017, and not materially modified after that date. Commencing in 2018, the company's tax deduction with regard to compensation of covered employees generally will be limited to $1 million per taxable year for each officer. We will generally seek to preserve the deductibility of performance-based compensation by meeting the requirements of Section 162(m), as amended by the Tax Act, in accordance with the transition rule applicable to binding contracts in effect on November 2, 2017, to the extent practicable and in the best interests of CF Industries and its stockholders.

COMPENSATION CONSULTANT MATTERS

As noted above, the compensation committee has engaged Exequity, an executive compensation consulting firm, to assist the committee in making recommendations and decisions regarding compensation for our directors and executive officers. Exequity provides no other services to the company.

The compensation committee has determined, after appropriate inquiry (and taking into account the other fees described above), including consideration of Exequity's independence in light of the factors set forth under Rule 10C-1 of the Exchange Act, that no conflicts of interest exist with respect to the firm's engagement as the committee's independent compensation consultant.

COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS RISK ANALYSIS

As noted above, the compensationand management development committee reviewed the potential effects of the various components of our compensation and benefits program for 20172019 upon individual and collective behavior and, ultimately, upon our risk profile and our overall approach to risk management. The compensation and management development committee reviewed the following relevant features of:

Based on this review, the compensation and management development committee determined that the company's compensation and benefits program balances risk and potential reward in a manner that is appropriate to the circumstances and in the best interests of the company's stockholdersshareholders over the long term.


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT

The compensation and management development committee oversees our compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including our executive compensation plans, director compensation plans, and other incentive compensation and equity-based plans. The compensation and management development committee is composed of sevenfive non-employee directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. Each member of the compensation and management development committee is independent within the meaning of the rules ofunder the corporate governance standards of the NYSE applicable to compensation committee members. The Board has also determined that all of the members of the committee qualify as "non-employee directors," within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and "outside directors," within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The compensation and management development committee held sevenfive meetings during the year ended December 31, 20172019 and met in executive session at threefour of the meetings. The compensation and management development committee also reviewed and discussed with management the compensation discussion and analysis section of this Proxy Statement.

Based on its review and the foregoing meetings and discussions, the compensation and management development committee recommended to the Board that the compensation discussion and analysis section be included in this Proxy Statement and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.10-K.

Stephen J. Hagge (Chair)
Stephen A. Furbacher
John D. Johnson
Anne P. Noonan
Edward A. Schmitt
Michael J. Toelle
Theresa E. WaglerCelso L. White


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the total compensation we provided with respect to the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016,2017, 2018, and 20172019 for (i) our principal executive officer, (ii) our principal financial officer, (iii) our former principal financial officer and (iii)(iv) our three other most highly compensated executive officers (as determined on the basis of their total compensation for 20172019 other than changes in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings). We refer to these individuals in this Proxy Statement as our "named executive officers."

Name and Principal Position(1)
 Year Salary(2)
($)
 Stock
Awards(3)
($)
 Option
Awards(3)
($)
 Non-equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation(2)(4)
($)
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5)(6)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(7)
($)
 Total
($)
 

W. Anthony Will

  2017  1,150,000  2,919,938  3,180,429  1,956,200  81,041  174,407  9,462,015 

President and Chief Executive

  2016  1,150,000  2,041,560  3,060,026    57,544  128,383  6,437,513 

Officer

  2015  1,000,000  1,399,819  2,099,995  1,043,800  40,616  97,769  5,681,999 

Dennis P. Kelleher

  
2017
  
625,000
  
900,017
  
900,103
  
708,800
  
38,167
  
70,225
  
3,242,312
 

Senior Vice President and Chief

  2016  625,000  560,465  840,041    31,739  62,393  2,119,637 

Financial Officer

  2015  575,000  440,114  660,022  350,100  19,062  60,162  2,104,460 

Douglas C. Barnard

  
2017
  
530,000
  
625,026
  
600,094
  
534,200
  
38,500
  
54,292
  
2,382,112
 

Senior Vice President, General

  2016  530,000  360,121  539,994    34,084  49,842  1,514,041 

Counsel, and Secretary

  2015  500,000  299,919  449,974  304,400  27,432  49,489  1,631,214 

Christopher D. Bohn(8)

  
2017
  
500,000
  
539,991
  
510,076
  
441,000
  
30,452
  
48,282
  
2,069,801
 

Senior Vice President,

  2016  500,000  299,973  450,025    24,305  40,864  1,315,167 

Manufacturing and Distribution

                         

Bert A. Frost

  
2017
  
575,000
  
710,061
  
690,112
  
579,600
  
36,570
  
60,073
  
2,651,416
 

Senior Vice President, Sales,

  2016  575,000  400,326  600,003    30,012  56,078  1,661,419 

Market Development and Supply

  2015  525,000  339,886  510,008  319,700  21,548  55,588  1,771,730 

Chain

                         
Name and Principal Position    
 Year Salary(1)
($)
 Stock
Awards(2)(3)
($)
 Option
Awards(2)(3)
($)
 Non-equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation(1)(4)
($)
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(5)(6)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(7)
($)
 Total
($)
 

W. Anthony Will

  
2019
  
1,150,000
  
4,743,916
  
  
2,488,658
  
115,536
  
260,133
  
8,758,243
 

President and Chief

  2018  1,150,000  3,441,898    2,872,125  51,357  242,625  7,758,005 

Executive Officer

  2017  1,150,000  2,919,938  3,180,429  1,956,200  81,041  174,407  9,462,015 

Christopher D. Bohn

  
2019
  
565,385
  
947,794
  
  
723,570
  
54,463
  
71,572
  
2,362,783
 

Senior Vice President

  2018  500,000  649,418    647,500  16,381  62,029  1,875,328 

and Chief Financial Officer

  2017  500,000  539,991  510,076  441,000  30,452  48,282  2,069,801 

Douglas C. Barnard

  
2019
  
540,000
  
887,063
  
  
692,200
  
53,069
  
71,133
  
2,243,464
 

Senior Vice President,

  2018  530,000  649,418    784,400  30,573  67,321  2,061,712 

General Counsel, and Secretary

  2017  530,000  625,026  600,094  534,200  38,500  54,292  2,382,112 

Bert A. Frost

  
2019
  
600,000
  
1,134,949
  
  
768,700
  
59,775
  
98,010
  
2,661,435
 

Senior Vice President,

  2018  575,000  844,241    851,000  26,198  76,892  2,373,331 

Sales, Market Development and Supply Chain

  2017  575,000  710,061  690,112  579,600  36,570  60,073  2,651,416 

Susan L. Menzel(8)

  
2019
  
504,110
  
586,934
  
  
576,636
  
23,076
  
57,647
  
1,748,403
 

Senior Vice President,

                         

Human Resources

                         

Dennis P. Kelleher(9)

  
2019
  
416,667
  
5,081,017
  
1,905,595
  
601,125
  
45,849
  
290,491
  
8,340,744
 

Former Senior Vice

  2018  625,000  844,241    1,040,625  24,016  87,423  2,621,305 

President and Chief Financial Officer

  2017  625,000  900,017  900,103  708,800  38,167  70,225  3,242,312 

(1)
Total compensation for each of the named executive officers increased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily as a result of the annual incentive awards earned by the officers based on our 2017 performance and the additional RSUs granted to our named executive officers as a supplemental performance alignment award in 2017. Additional information with respect to the annual incentive awards for 2017 is set forth above under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2017 Cash Compensation" and the supplemental performance alignment awards are described above under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2017 Long-term Incentives."

(2)
Amounts in these two columns represent base salary and non-equity incentive plan compensation earned in 2015, 2016,2017, 2018, and 20172019 regardless of when such amounts are paid in cash.

(3)(2)
Amounts in these two columns represent the grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the stock option, RSU and PRSU awards that we granted to the named executive officers pursuant to our Equity and Incentive Plans. Plans in 2017, 2018 and 2019 and the modification of the stock option, RSU and PRSU awards granted to Mr. Kelleher in connection with his retirement and Separation Agreement. See footnote 9 for a discussion of the modification of Mr. Kelleher's awards. As described in footnote 3 below and consistent with the applicable accounting rules, the amounts shown in the table above in 2019 represent the value of one-third of the target number of 2019 PRSUs awarded at grant as only the first-year goal of the three-year performance period beginning in 2019 was communicated to award holders in 2019 as well as the value of one-third of the target number of 2018 PRSUs, at the second-year goal of the three-year performance period beginning in 2018 was communicated to grant holders in 2019. The compensation and management development committee considered the full value of the 2019 PRSU award when making the 2019 PRSU grant and the amounts shown below represent the grant date

Table of Contents

    fair (full) values for the 2019 RSU and PRSU awards using a fair value of $42.03 per RSU and $43.26 per PRSU at target and $42.03 per PRSU at maximum:

 

 Will  Bohn  Barnard  Frost  Menzel  Kelleher 
 

RSUs ($)

 2,366,583 481,328 441,231 561,563 300,851 541,515
 

PRSUs at Target Level of Performance ($)

 3,653,783 743,120 681,215 867,017 464,483 836,043
 

2019 Stock Awards (Full Grant Date Fair Value) ($)

 6,020,366 1,224,448 1,122,446 1,428,580 765,333 1,377,557
 

PRSUs at Maximum Level of Performance ($)

 8,519,750 1,732,779 1,588,431 2,021,677 1,083,063 1,949,452
(3)
Our assumptions with respect to the FASB ASC Topic 718 valuation of these equity awards are described in the footnotes to our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. Additional information with respect to the outstanding stock option, RSU and PRSU awards is set forth below under the headings "Grants of Plan-based Awards" and "Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End." In accordance with SEC rules, the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs in the Summary Compensation Table is calculated as the product of the number of RSUs multiplied by the closing price for our stock ($42.03 per share) on the NYSE on the grant date. Because the grant date for the PRSUs under accounting rules occurs when the applicable performance goals are set and our 2018 PRSUs (awarded in 2018 for the performance period 2018-2020) and 2019 PRSUs (awarded in 2019 for the performance period 2019-2021) are composed of three one-year periods with performance goals set annually, the "target" amount shown in 2019 represents one-third of the total 2018 PRSUs and one-third of the total 2019 PRSUs. In accordance with SEC rules, the aggregate grant date fair value of the PRSUs is calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date, which, for the PRSUPRSUs reflected in this table, was target level performance. Therefore, values in the table for PRSU awards are computed by multiplyingas the product of the number of shares of stock to be delivered

Table of Contents

    assuming target level performance multiplied by the grant date fair value of each PRSU ($45.3744.09 for the awards granted in 2017)2018 PRSUs and $43.26 for the 2019 PRSUs). If maximum level performance were assumed to be achieved, based on the units included here (1/3 of the total target number of 2018 PRSUs awarded and 1/3 of the total target number of 2019 PRSUs awarded), then the grant date fair value of eachthe PRSUs with an accounting grant date in 2019 (computed as the product of the 2017 PRSU awards (computed by multiplying the number of shares of stock to be delivered assuming maximum level performance multiplied by the closing price for our stock ($30.9542.03 per share) on the NYSE on the grant date) would have been as follows: $1,590,582$5,492,480 for Mr. Will; $450,075$1,078,086 for Mr. Kelleher; $300,277Bohn, $1,029,970 for Mr. Barnard; $255,338$1,324,517 for Mr. Bohn;Frost; $661,317 for Ms. Menzel and $345,216$1,300,442 for Mr. Frost.

Kelleher.

(4)
Amounts in this column represent amounts that the named executive officers earned with respect to the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016,2017, 2018, and 20172019 as the result of annual incentive awards we granted to the named executive officers pursuant to our non-equity incentive plan. Additional information with respect to these annual incentive awards for 20172019 is set forth above under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—20172019 Cash Compensation" and below under the heading "Grants of Plan-based Awards."

(5)
Amounts in this column represent only the change during the particular year in the actuarial present value of the named executive officer's accumulated pension benefits under our New Retirement Plan (a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan) and our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan (a nonqualified benefits restoration and deferred compensation plan). Our assumptions with respect to the determination of this value are described in the footnotes to our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. For this purpose, we have also assumed retirement at age 65. Additional information with respect to our defined benefit pension plans is set forth below under the heading "Pension Benefits."

(6)
This column does not include any above-market or preferential earnings with respect to nonqualified deferred compensation, since all earnings were determined by a third-party plan administrator and set to equal the published total return on notional capital market investments selected in advance by the named executive officers. Additional information with respect to the named executive officers' nonqualified deferred compensation earnings is set forth below under the heading "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation."


Table of Contents

(7)
Amounts in this column for 20172019 represent (i) employer contributions and credits to the company 401(k) Plan (a tax-qualified defined contribution retirement plan), which we refer to herein as our 401(k) Plan, and to our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan, (ii) employer-paid term life insurance premiums, and (iii) dividend equivalents on RSUs, in each case as set forth in the following table:
Name
 Employer
Contributions
and Credits to
Retirement Plans
($)
 Employer-paid
Life Insurance
Premiums
($)
 Dividend
Equivalents on
RSUs
($)
 Total*
($)
 

W. Anthony Will

  68,704  1,370  104,333  174,407 

Dennis P. Kelleher

  36,977  857  32,391  70,225 

Douglas C. Barnard

  31,182  727  22,383  54,292 

Christopher D. Bohn

  28,892  686  18,704  48,282 

Bert A. Frost

  33,890  789  25,394  60,073 

 Name Employer
Contributions
and Credits
to Retirement
Plans
($)
 Employer-
paid Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)
 Dividend
Equivalents on
RSUs
($)
 Other*
($)
 Total
($)
 
 

W. Anthony Will

  68,546  1,370  190,217    260,133 
 

Christopher D. Bohn

  33,485  823  37,264    71,572 
 

Douglas C. Barnard

  31,888  741  38,504    71,133 
 

Bert A. Frost

  35,633  823  46,624  14,930  98,010 
 

Susan L. Menzel

  29,675  686  27,286    57,647 
 

Dennis P. Kelleher**

  25,517  594  51,371  213,010  290,491 

    *
    For each named executive officer, excludes perquisites and other personal benefits unlesssince the total value of all perquisites and other personal benefits for thateach named executive officer isdid not exceed $10,000 or more.more, except that Mr. Frost had an executive physical, which amount is included in the "Other" column for Mr. Frost.

    **
    The "Other" for Mr. Kelleher includes $208,333, which represents the base salary continuation payments paid in 2019 and $4,676 for COBRA reimbursement payments, in each case for the period from September 2, 2019 through December 31, 2019, pursuant to the Separation Agreement.

    Mr. Will received no additional compensation for service as a director. None of the named executive officers received additional compensation for their service as a director or executive officer of TNGP.

(8)
2016 was Mr. Bohn's2019 is Ms. Menzel's first year as a named executive officer.

(9)
Mr. Kelleher retired effective as of September 1, 2019. In connection with Mr. Kelleher's retirement, the company and Mr. Kelleher entered into a Transition and Separation Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2019 (the Separation Agreement). The terms and conditions of the Separation Agreement are described below under the heading "—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Dennis Kelleher Retirement and Separation Agreement." The Separation Agreement provides for the continued vesting of Mr. Kelleher's outstanding company equity awards pursuant to the vesting schedule and terms of such awards and continued exercisability of any outstanding company stock options for four years following the Retirement Date or expiration of the term of the option, if earlier. As a result of the modification of all of Mr. Kelleher's unvested RSU and PRSU award grants from 2017, 2018 and 2019 and all of his stock options (exercisable and unexercisable) pursuant to the Separation Agreement, the company has reported the fair value of the modified awards in the above table as compensation in 2019. Therefore, amounts reported for Mr. Kelleher's stock awards in 2019 include the January 2, 2019 RSU and PRSU grants (which had a grant date fair value of $1,104,576) as well as the incremental fair value of the modified 2017, 2018 and 2019 RSU and PRSU awards (with respect to the PRSUs, using the full number of PRSUs awarded for the 2018-2020 and 2019-2021 performance periods), computed as of the modification date of May 30, 2019. Amounts reported for Mr. Kelleher's option awards reflect the incremental fair value of the modified stock options originally granted between 2011 and 2017.

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-based Awards

The following table shows all plan-based awards that we granted for the year ended December 31, 20172019 to each of the named executive officers. Additional information regarding these awards is set forth above under the heading "Summary Compensation Table."

2019 Grants of Plan-based Awards Table


  
  
 


Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards(6)
($)
 

  
  
  
  
  
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units(4)
(#)
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(5)
(#)
  
   
  
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(3)
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units(4)
(#)
  
  
 Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(6)
($)
 

  
  
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(3)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
Grant
Date
Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards(6)
($)
  
  
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(5)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 
Name
 Type of
Award(1)
 Grant
Date
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 Type
of
Award(1)
 Grant
Date
 

Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(6)
($)

W. Anthony Will

 STI 12/13/2016 776,250 1,552,500 3,000,000        STI 12/13/2018 776,250 1,552,500 3,105,000       

 PRSU 3/3/2017    11,680 23,360 51,392    1,059,843 PRSU1 1/2/2019    14,077 28,154 67,569    1,217,928

 RSU 3/3/2017       60,100   1,860,095  PRSU2 1/2/2019    13,148 26,296 63,111    1,159,405 

 SO 3/3/2017        415,140 30.95 3,180,429  RSU 1/2/2019       56,307   2,366,583 

Dennis P. Kelleher

 

STI

 
12/13/2016
 
281,250
 
562,500
 
1,125,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Christopher D. Bohn

 

STI

 
12/13/2018
 
220,000
 
440,000
 
880,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 PRSU 3/3/2017    3,305 6,610 14,542    299,896  PRSU1 1/2/2019    2,863 5,726 13,742    247,707 

 RSU 3/3/2017       19,390   600,121  PRSU2 1/2/2019    2,481 4,962 11,908    218,760 

 SO 3/3/2017        117,490 30.95 900,103  RSU 1/2/2019       11,452   481,328 

Douglas C. Barnard

 

STI

 
12/13/2016
 
212,000
 
424,000
 
848,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

STI

 
12/13/2018
 
216,000
 
432,000
 
864,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 PRSU 3/3/2017    2,205 4,410 9,702    200,082  PRSU1 1/2/2019    2,625 5,249 12,598    227,072 

 RSU 3/3/2017       13,730   424,944  PRSU2 1/2/2019    2,481 4,962 11,908    218,760 

 SO 3/3/2017        78,330 30.95 600,094  RSU 1/2/2019       10,498   441,231 

Christopher D. Bohn

 

STI

 
12/13/2016
 
175,000
 
350,000
 
700,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 PRSU 3/3/2017    1,875 3,750 8,250    170,138 

 RSU 3/3/2017       11,950   369,853 

 SO 3/3/2017        66,580 30.95 510,076 

Bert A. Frost

 

STI

 
12/13/2016
 
230,000
 
460,000
 
920,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

STI

 
12/13/2018
 
240,000
 
480,000
 
960,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 PRSU 3/3/2017    2,535 5,070 11,154    230,026  PRSU1 1/2/2019    3,340 6,681 16,034    289,006 

 RSU 3/3/2017       15,510   480,035  PRSU2 1/2/2019    3,225 6,450 15,480    284,381 

 SO 3/3/2017        90,080 30.95 690,112  RSU 1/2/2019       13,361   561,563 

Susan L. Menzel

 

STI

 
12/13/2018
 
175,000
 
350,000
 
700,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 PRSU1 1/2/2019    1,790 3,579 8,590    154,828 

 PRSU2 1/2/2019    1,489 2,977 7,145    131,256 

 RSU 1/2/2019       7,158   300,851 

Dennis P. Kelleher

 

STI

 
12/13/2018
 
281,250
 
562,500
 
1,125,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 PRSU1 1/2/2019    3,221 6,442 15,461    278,681 

 PRSU2 1/2/2019    3,225 6,450 15,480    284,381 

 RSU 1/2/2019       12,884   541,515 

 SO 5/30/2019        448,655 39.76 1,905,595 

 RSU 5/30/2019       40,874   1,659,075 

 PRSU 5/30/2019    22,643 45,286 107,364    2,317,365 

(1)
Type of Award:
STI Short-Term Incentive Plan
PRSU 1Performance Vesting Restricted Stock Unit, Year 1 of 2019-2021 PRSU Award
PRSU2Performance Vesting Restricted Stock Unit, Year 2 of 2018-2020 PRSU Award
PRSU Performance Vesting Restricted Stock Unit
RSU Restricted Stock Unit
SO Stock Option
(2)
In December 2018, Messrs. Will, Kelleher,Bohn, Barnard Bohn, and Frost, Ms. Menzel and Mr. Kelleher were assigned target award opportunities equal to 135%, 90%80%, 80%, 80%, 70%, and 80%90% of their respective base salaries.salaries for 2019. In connection with his appointment as chief financial officer, Mr. Bohn's annual base salary was increased to $600,000 during 2019. In connection with Ms. Menzel's assumption of additional responsibilities as the executive overseeing information technology, her base salary was increased to $525,000 and her target annual incentive level was increased to 75%. As a result of these changes, the threshold, target and maximum amounts that Mr. Bohn and Ms. Menzel could earn for 2019 under the short-term incentive plan were also increased. The terms and conditions of these awards are described above under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—20172019 Cash Compensation." We recently determined the

Table of Contents

    amounts that each of the named executive officers had earned with respect to these awards, based on our corporate performance for 2017,2019, as set forth above under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—20172019 Cash Compensation—Approval of Annual Incentive Payments for 2017"2019" and "Summary Compensation Table."

(3)
The amounts in the "Threshold," "Target," and "Maximum" columns with the January 2, 2019 grant date reflect the PRSU opportunity awardedgranted during 2017.2019 for the 2019 performance period (the first of three one-year performance periods for the 2019 PRSUs and the second of three one-year performance periods for the 2018 PRSUs). The terms and conditions of these PRSU awards are described above under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2017Review and Approval of 2019 Long-term Incentives." As stated in that section, on the award grant date, the compensation and management development committee approved dollar-denominated 2019 PRSU awards for the individual executive officers. After the close of business on the award grant date, the dollar-denominated awards were translated into an actual number of PRSUs using that day'sby dividing the award values by the unweighted average closing price forof our stock on the NYSE asfor the input to valuation formulas recommended by our outside compensation consultant and approved in advance bytwenty trading days preceding the compensation committee and a Monte-Carlo simulation.award grant date. As further described in that section, these awards will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the attainment of the

Table of Contents

    performance goals for the performance period and subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting.vesting, these awards will vest upon the certification by the compensation and management development committee of the attainment of the performance goals following the end of the applicable three-year performance period. The dollar valueperformance metrics for each of each PRSU at the time2018 PRSUs and the 2019 PRSUs are composed of grant was $45.37.two measures: average return on net assets ("RONA") over three one-year periods and a modifier pursuant to which the number of shares earned based on RONA performance may be increased or decreased by up to 20% based on our three-year TSR performance. The PRSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the performance and vesting period. Upon vesting, holders of PRSUs will be paid a cash equivalent of the dividends paid on our common stock during the performance and vesting period based on the number of shares of stock, if any, delivered upon the settlement of the PRSUs. Because the grant date for the PRSUs under accounting rules occurs when the applicable performance goals are set, the "target" amount shown represents one-third of the total 2018 PRSUs awarded in 2018 for the performance period 2018-2020 and one-third of the total 2019 PRSUs awarded in 2019 for the performance period 2019-2021. See the Summary Compensation Table footnote 2 for further information on the full value of the 2019 PRSU grant.

      The amounts in the "Threshold," "Target," and "Maximum" columns for Mr. Kelleher with the May 30, 2019 grant date reflect the modification of his previously granted and unvested 2017, 2018 and 2019 PRSU awards for the incremental value of the continued vesting of such PRSU awards pursuant to the terms and conditions of his Separation Agreement. See the Summary Compensation Table footnote 9 for a discussion of the modification of Mr. Kelleher's awards.

    (4)
    The amounts shown in this column represent the RSUs granted to our named executive officers in connection with setting the officers' target compensation for 2017 and the additional RSUs granted to our named executive officers as a supplemental performance alignment award. All of the RSUs granted in 2017 will vest and be settled in shares of common stock on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject2019. Subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting.vesting, all of the RSUs with a January 2, 2019 grant date will vest in three equal annual installments following the date of grant. We will pay dividend equivalents in cash on the RSUs to the named executive officers during the vesting period. The terms and conditions of these RSU awards are described above under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—20172019 Long-term Incentives."

    (5)
    Subject

      The RSUs granted to earlier forfeiture or acceleratedMr. Kelleher on May 30, 2019 reflect the modification of his previously granted and unvested RSU awards from 2017, 2018 and 2019 for the incremental value of the continued vesting of such RSU awards pursuant to the options granted during 2017 will generally become exercisable in three equal annual installments following the dateterms and conditions of grant and will expire ten years from the date of grant.his Separation Agreement. The terms and conditions of thesethe Separation Agreement are described below under the heading "—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control—Dennis Kelleher Retirement and Separation Agreement."

    (5)
    The terms of Mr. Kelleher's Separation Agreement, dated May 30, 2019, provide for continued exercisability of any outstanding company stock options for four years following the Retirement Date or expiration of the term of the option, if earlier. The above table reflects the modification of all of Mr. Kelleher's outstanding stock option awards are described above underat May 30, 2019 for the heading "Compensation Discussionincremental value of extended exercisability. Such awards were originally granted to Mr. Kelleher on an annual basis between 2011 and Analysis—2017 Long-term Incentives."and have a weighted average exercise price of $39.76.

    (6)
    Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of the stock option, RSU and PRSU awards that we granted to the named executive officers during 2017.

Table of Contents

    2019. The grant date fair value for the RSUs is calculated using the closing price of our stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. The grant date fair value for the PRSUs are calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation performed as of the date of grant by an independent third party. The dollar value of the PRSU1s at the time of grant was $43.26 and the dollar value of the PRSU2s at the time of grant was $44.09. Our assumptions with respect to the FASB ASC Topic 718 valuation of these equity awards are described in the footnotes to our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. As a result of the modification of all of Mr. Kelleher's unvested RSU and PRSU award grants from 2017, 2018 and 2019 and all of his stock options (exercisable and unexercisable) pursuant to the Separation Agreement, the company has reported on May 30, 2019, the date of the Separation Agreement, modified awards and the incremental fair value of such awards in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards held as of December 31, 20172019 by each of the named executive officers. Additional information with respect to the equity awards granted during 20172019 is set forth above under the heading "Grants of Plan-based Awards."

2019 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table

 
 Option Awards(1) Stock Awards(2)(3) 
Name
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(4)
 Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(6)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)(5)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(6)
 

W. Anthony Will

  24,850    25.07  8/11/2018         

  33,500    16.41  8/10/2019         

  34,000    13.41  5/25/2020         

  37,000    16.26  8/10/2020         

  27,450    29.92  8/10/2021         

  30,475    41.59  8/10/2022         

  44,400    38.02  8/12/2023         

  117,425    51.17  3/3/2024         

  100,040  50,025  62.25  3/3/2025  15,085  641,716     

  113,713  227,427  36.19  3/3/2026  28,180  1,198,777  12,555  534,090 

    415,140  30.95  3/3/2027  60,100  2,556,654  51,392  2,186,216 

Dennis P. Kelleher

  
53,550
  
  
34.11
  
8/22/2021
  
  
  
  
 

  30,475    41.59  8/10/2022         

  49,950    38.02  8/12/2023         

  56,375    51.17  3/3/2024         

  31,440  15,725  62.25  3/3/2025  4,743  201,767     

  31,216  62,434  36.19  3/3/2026  7,740  329,260  3,445  146,550 

    117,490  30.95  3/3/2027  19,390  824,851  14,542  618,617 

Douglas C. Barnard

  
23,300
  
  
25.07
  
8/11/2018
  
  
  
  
 

  33,500    16.41  8/10/2019         

  34,000    13.41  5/25/2020         

  33,000    16.26  8/10/2020         

  20,600    29.92  8/10/2021         

  24,400    41.59  8/10/2022         

  36,100    38.02  8/12/2023         

  46,975    51.17  3/3/2024         

  21,435  10,720  62.25  3/3/2025  3,233  137,532     

  20,066  40,134  36.19  3/3/2026  4,970  211,424  2,215  94,226 

    78,330  30.95  3/3/2027  13,730  584,074  9,702  412,723 

Christopher D. Bohn

  
7,500
  
  
18.56
  
10/20/2019
  
  
  
  
 

  10,000    13.41  5/25/2020         

  14,000    16.26  8/10/2020         

  6,850    29.92  8/10/2021         

  8,125    41.59  8/10/2022         

  13,900    38.02  8/12/2023         

  18,800    51.17  3/3/2024         

  18,575  9,295  62.25  3/3/2025  2,803  119,240     

  16,723  33,447  36.19  3/3/2026  4,140  176,116  1,845  78,486 

    66,580  30.95  3/3/2027  11,950  508,353  8,250  350,955 

Bert A. Frost

  
23,675
  
  
9.73
  
12/11/2018
  
  
  
  
 

  29,500    16.41  8/10/2019         

  49,500    16.26  8/10/2020         

  27,450    29.92  8/10/2021         

  30,475    41.59  8/10/2022         

  44,400    38.02  8/12/2023         

  61,075    51.17  3/3/2024         

  24,295  12,150  62.25  3/3/2025  3,663  155,824     

  22,296  44,594  36.19  3/3/2026  5,530  235,246  2,460  104,648 

    90,080  30.95  3/3/2027  15,510  659,795  11,154  474,491 
 
  
 Option Awards(2) Stock Awards(3)(4)
Name Grant Date/
Performance
Period(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(5)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(7)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)(6)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(7)

W. Anthony Will

 8/10/2011 27,450  29.92 8/10/2021    

 8/10/2012 30,475  41.59 8/10/2022    

 8/12/2013 44,400  38.02 8/12/2023    

 3/3/2014 117,425  51.17 3/3/2024    

 3/3/2015 150,065  62.25 3/3/2025    

 3/3/2016 341,140  36.19 3/3/2026    

 3/3/2017 276,760 138,380 30.95 3/3/2027 111,492 5,322,628  

 1/2/2018     35,062 1,673,860  

 1/2/2019     56,307 2,688,096  

 1/1/18-12/31/20       189,334 9,038,786

 1/1/19-12/31/21       202,706 9,677,204

Christopher D. Bohn

 
5/25/2010
 
10,000
 
 
13.41
 
5/25/2020
 
 
 
 

 8/10/2010 14,000  16.26 8/10/2020    

 8/10/2011 6,850  29.92 8/10/2021    

 8/10/2012 8,125  41.59 8/10/2022    

 8/12/2013 13,900  38.02 8/12/2023    

 3/3/2014 18,800  51.17 3/3/2024    

 3/3/2015 27,870  62.25 3/3/2025    

 3/3/2016 50,170  36.19 3/3/2026    

 3/3/2017 44,386 22,194 30.95 3/3/2027 20,200 964,348  

 1/2/2018     6,616 315,848  

 1/2/2019     11,452 546,718  

 1/1/18-12/31/20       35,724 1,705,464

 1/1/19-12/31/21       41,227 1,968,187

Douglas C. Barnard

 
8/10/2011
 
20,600
 
 
29.92
 
8/10/2021
 
 
 
 

 8/10/2012 24,400  41.59 8/10/2022    

 8/12/2013 36,100  38.02 8/12/2023    

 3/3/2014 46,975  51.17 3/3/2024    

 3/3/2015 32,155  62.25 3/3/2025    

 3/3/2016 60,200  36.19 3/3/2026    

 3/3/2017 52,219 26,111 30.95 3/3/2027 23,432 1,118,644  

 1/2/2018     6,616 315,848  

 1/2/2019     10,498 501,175  

 1/1/18-12/31/20       35,724 1,705,464

 1/1/19-12/31/21       37,793 1,804,228

Bert A. Frost

 
8/10/2010
 
15,500
 
 
16.26
 
8/10/2020
 
 
 
 

 8/10/2011 27,450  29.92 8/10/2021    

 8/10/2012 30,475  41.59 8/10/2022    

 8/12/2013 44,400  38.02 8/12/2023    

 3/3/2014 61,075  51.17 3/3/2024    

 3/3/2015 36,445  62.25 3/3/2025    

 3/3/2016 66,890  36.19 3/3/2026    

 3/3/2017 60,053 30,027 30.95 3/3/2027 26,664 1,272,939  

 1/2/2018     8,600 410,564  

 1/2/2019     13,361 637,854  

 1/1/18-12/31/20       46,440 2,217,046

 1/1/19-12/31/21       48,101 2,296,332

Table of Contents

 
  
 Option Awards(2) Stock Awards(3)(4)
Name Grant Date/
Performance
Period(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(5)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(7)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)(6)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(7)

Susan L. Menzel

 10/9/2017     11,610 554,261  

 1/2/2018     3,970 189,528  

 1/2/2019     7,158 341,723  

 1/1/18-12/31/20       21,434 1,023,278

 1/1/19-12/31/21       25,769 1,230,203

Dennis P. Kelleher

 
8/10/2012
 
30,475
 
 
41.59
 
8/10/2022
 
 
 
 

 8/12/2013 49,950  38.02 8/12/2023    

 3/3/2014 56,375  51.17 9/1/2023    

 3/3/2015 47,165  62.25 9/1/2023    

 3/3/2016 93,650  36.19 9/1/2023    

 3/3/2017 78,326 39,164 30.95 9/1/2023 33,932 1,619,914  

 1/2/2018     8,600 410,564  

 1/2/2019     12,884 615,082  

 1/1/18-12/31/20       46,440 2,217,046

 1/1/19-12/31/21       46,382 2,214,296

(1)
For a better understanding of this table, in this column we include the grant dates of options and RSU awards and the performance periods for the PRSU awards. The stock options were grantedperformance metrics for each of the 2018 PRSUs and the 2019 PRSUs are composed of two measures: average return on net assets ("RONA") over three one-year periods and a modifier pursuant to which the dates thatnumber of shares earned based on RONA performance may be increased or decreased by up to 20% based on our three-year TSR performance. Because the grant date for the PRSUs under accounting rules occurs when the applicable performance goals are ten years prior toset, our 2018 PRSUs and 2019 PRSUs will have three "grant dates," one for each year of the option expiration datesthree-year performance period. At each such grant date 1/3 of the full PRSU award will be granted. Amounts shown in this table represent the same rowfull awards for each of the 2018 PRSUs and the 2019 PRSUs.

Mr. Kelleher's equity awards are set forth in the above table with their original award grant date. All such awards were modified on May 30, 2019 to provide for continued vesting in each instance. accordance with the Separation Agreement. See the Summary Compensation Table footnote 9 for a discussion of the modification of Mr. Kelleher's awards.

(2)
Subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting, (i) the options granted on May 25, 2010 became exercisable on the third anniversary following the date of grant and will expire ten years from the date of grant and (ii) the other

Table of Contents

    options shown in the table will generally become exercisable in three equal annual installments following the date of grant and will expire ten years from the date of grant. The accelerated vesting provisionsMr. Kelleher's Separation Agreement provides that Mr. Kelleher's stock options will remain exercisable until the earlier of September 1, 2023 and the other terms and conditionsexpiration of the option awards granted in 2017 are described above underterm applicable to the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2017 Long-term Incentives."

stock option.

(2)(3)
Commencing in 2014, RSUs and PRSUs have been granted to our executive officers. The RSUsFor 2018 and PRSUs were granted on2019, the same dates as thecompensation and management development committee determined that stock options shownwould not be awarded and that the long-term incentive awards to our named executive officers should be composed 60% in the same row of the tablePRSUs and 40% in each instance.RSUs.

(3)(4)
The RSU and the PRSU awards granted in 2017 will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting and subject in the case of the PRSU awards to the attainment of the performance goals for the performance period. Subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting, all of the RSU awards granted in 2018 and 2019 will vest in three equal annual installments following the date of grant.

Table of Contents

    Subject to earlier forfeiture or accelerated vesting, the PRSU awards granted in 2018 and 2019 will vest upon the certification by the compensation and management development committee of the attainment of the performance goals following the end of the three-year performance period. Until vested, the awards may not be sold, assigned, transferred, donated, pledged, or otherwise disposed of (except by will or the laws of descent and distribution). We will pay dividend equivalents in cash on the RSUs during the vesting period. The PRSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the performance and vesting period. Upon vesting, holders of PRSUs will be paid a cash equivalent of the dividends paid on our common stock during the performance and vesting period based on the number of shares of stock, if any, delivered in settlement of the PRSUs. The accelerated vesting provisions and the other terms and conditions of the stock awards granted in 20172019 are described above under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—20172019 Long-term Incentives."

(4)(5)
Reflects RSUs awarded in 2015, 20162017, 2018 and 20172019 and PRSUs awarded in 20152017 (for which the performance period ended at December 31, 2017)2019). In accordance with SEC rules, the number of PRSUs reported assumes attainmentis based on the actual number of shares underlying the PRSUs that were earned at the end of the three-year performance goals atperiod, subject to continued time vesting through the threshold level.third anniversary of the grant date. The performance goals actually attained were belowabove the thresholdmaximum level, and therefore no shares were delivered toresulting in the named executive officers in settlementvesting of 220% of the units.target PRSUs awarded in 2017.

(5)(6)
Reflects PRSUs awarded in 20162018 (for which the performance period ends at December 31, 2018)2020) and 20172019 (for which the performance period ends at December 31, 2019)2021). With respect to the units awarded in 2016,2018, actual performance through December 31, 20172019 was belowabove the thresholdtarget level and, in accordance with SEC rules, the number of 20162018 units reported assumes achievement of the thresholdmaximum performance level. With respect to the units awarded in 2017,2018, the amount shown represents the full 2018 PRSU award. For the 2019 PRSUs, actual performance through December 31, 20172019 was atabove the maximumtarget level and, in accordance with SEC rules, the number of 20172019 units reported assumes achievement of the maximum performance level. With respect to the units awarded in 2019, the amount shown represents the full 2019 PRSU award. See the Summary Compensation Table footnote 2 for further information on the full value of the 2019 PRSU grant.

(6)(7)
The value shown is based on the closing price for our stock ($42.5447.74 per share) on the NYSE on December 29, 201731, 2019 (the last trading day of 2017)2019).

Table of Contents

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth certain information concerning stock option exercises by each of the named executive officers and the vesting of RSUs and PRSUs held by each of the named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

2019 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

Name
 Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
 Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)(1)
 Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
 Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)(2)
 

W. Anthony Will

  43,500  899,955  9,775  302,536 

Dennis P. Kelleher

      4,700  145,465 

Douglas C. Barnard

      3,900  120,705 

Christopher D. Bohn

      1,575  48,746 

Bert A. Frost

  7,500  200,824  5,075  157,071 

 Name Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
 Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)(1)
 Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
 Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)(2)
 

W. Anthony Will

   60,057 2,526,322
 

Christopher D. Bohn(3)

 7,500 219,075 9,555 401,909
 

Douglas C. Barnard(3)

 100,500 3,557,255 10,808 454,635
 

Bert A. Frost(3)

 61,600 1,928,768 12,641 531,718
 

Susan L. Menzel

   1,984 83,388
 

Dennis P. Kelleher

 53,500 756,683 15,976 672,055

(1)
The value realized on the exercise of stock options was calculated based on the difference between the exercise price of the stock options and (i) the sale price of underlying shares of stock that were sold immediately following exercise or (ii) if the underlying shares of stock were held following exercise, the closing price for our stock on the NYSE on the exercise date.

(2)
The value realized on vesting of stock awards was computed by multiplying the number of shares of stock vesting by the closing price for our stock on the NYSE on the vesting date and, if the vesting date was not a trading day, the first trading day after the vesting date.

(3)
All of the options exercised by Messrs. Barnard, Bohn and Frost had expiration dates in 2019 or 2020. Mr. Bohn's options were automatically exercised prior to expiration in accordance with the terms of the option award agreement.

Table of Contents

Pension Benefits

The following table sets forth certain information concerning accumulated retirement benefits as of December 31, 2017,2019, for each of the named executive officers.

2019 Pension Benefits Table

Name
 Plan Name(1) Number
of Years
Credited
Service(2)
(#)
 Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(2)(3)
($)
 Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
  Plan Name(1) Number
of Years
Credited
Service(2)
(#)
 Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(2)(3)
($)
 Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year
($)

W. Anthony Will

 New Retirement Plan 10.7 67,712   New Retirement Plan 12.7 109,207 

 Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 10.7 170,673   Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 12.7 296,071 

Dennis P. Kelleher

 

New Retirement Plan

 
6.3
 
57,638
 
 

Christopher D. Bohn

 

New Retirement Plan

 
10.3
 
100,256
 

 Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 6.3 69,820   Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 10.3 63,655 

Douglas C. Barnard

 

New Retirement Plan

 
14
 
78,285
 
  

New Retirement Plan

 
16
 
121,832
 

 Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 14 69,344   Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 16 109,439 

Christopher D. Bohn

 

New Retirement Plan

 
8.3
 
61,697
 
 

 Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 8.3 31,370  

Bert A. Frost

 

New Retirement Plan

 
9.1
 
65,484
 
  

New Retirement Plan

 
11.1
 
106,505
 

 Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 9.1 66,089   Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 11.1 111,041 

Susan L. Menzel

 

New Retirement Plan

 
2.2
 
26,499
 

 Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 2.2 16,509 

Dennis P. Kelleher

 

New Retirement Plan

 
8.1
 
 
92,817

 Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan 8.1 104,505 

(1)
We maintain a defined benefit pension plan named the CF Industries Holdings, Inc. Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan"). Supplement A of the Pension Plan, which we refer to herein as the New Retirement Plan, is a tax qualified defined benefit pension plan that became effective on January 1, 2013, under which all domestic employees (including executive officers) became eligible to participate as of January 1, 2013, except for those employees who participate in Supplement B

Table of Contents

    of the Pension Plan. Supplement B of the Pension Plan is our historic defined benefit pension plan, which we refer to herein as the Old Retirement Plan and which was closed to new participants on December 31, 2003. Our named executive officers are ineligible to participate in our Old Retirement Plan because their employment commenced after our Old Retirement Plan had been closed to new participants. Our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan is a nonqualified benefits restoration and deferred compensation plan.



(2)
The annual pension benefit under our New Retirement Plan assuming retirement at age 65 is equal to the actuarial equivalent of a participant's cash balance account expressed as a single-life annuity payable monthly. The company provides an annual credit to each participant's cash balance account equal to a percentage of the participant's eligible compensation determined based on a participant's years of service (as set forth in the table below). Each participant's cash balance account will earn an annual return based on the greater of (i) the annual yield on 10-year treasury nominal securities and (ii) 3% annual interest.
Completed Years of Cash Balance Service
as of the Last Day of the Plan Year for
Which the Pay Credit is Credited
 
Pay Credit as a Percentage of
Compensation for the Plan
Year

Fewer than 5

 4%4%
At least 5 but fewer than 10 5%5%
At least 10 but fewer than 15 6%6%

At least 15

 7%7%

    Table of Contents


    Benefits under our New Retirement Plan are paid in a straight life annuity or qualified joint and survivor annuity for unmarried and married participants, respectively, unless the participant has elected another form of annuity payment permitted under our New Retirement Plan or a lump sum payment. In the event of a participant's death while an active employee, a benefit is payable to a participant's beneficiary as a lump sum to the extent the beneficiary is not the participant's spouse and solely with respect to spousal beneficiaries, either a lump sum or an annuity. A participant who has not reached the age of 65, but has completed three years of vesting service may be eligible to receive a monthly retirement benefit under the New Retirement Plan.



    (3)
    Amounts in this column represent the actuarial present value of the named executive officers' accumulated pension benefits under our New Retirement Plan and our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan. Our assumptions with respect to the determination of this value are described in the footnotes to our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. For this purpose, we have also assumed retirement at age 65. Additional information with respect to the aggregate change over the past year in the actuarial present value of the named executive officers' accumulated pension benefits under these plans is set forth above under the heading "Summary Compensation Table."

    Table of Contents

    Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

    The following table sets forth certain information concerning nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan for each of the named executive officers with respect to fiscal year 2017.2019.

    2019 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

    Name
     Executive
    Contributions
    in Last FY(1)
    ($)
     Registrant
    Contributions
    in Last FY(2)
    ($)
     Aggregate
    Earnings in
    Last FY(3)
    ($)
     Aggregate
    Withdrawals/
    Distributions
    ($)
     Aggregate
    Balance at
    Last FYE(4)
    ($)
      Executive
    Contributions
    in Last FY(1)
    ($)
     Registrant
    Contributions
    in Last FY(2)
    ($)
     Aggregate
    Earnings in
    Last FY(3)
    ($)
     Aggregate
    Withdrawals/
    Distributions
    ($)
     Aggregate
    Balance at
    Last FYE(4)
    ($)

    W. Anthony Will

     52,800 52,800 233,114  833,713  52,200 52,200 133,388  1,225,654

    Christopher D. Bohn

     146,554 17,054 107,676  696,986

    Douglas C. Barnard

     15,586 15,586 108,433  1,132,628

    Bert A. Frost

     104,265 19,165 134,478  773,228

    Susan L. Menzel

     13,359 13,359 7,106  55,628

    Dennis P. Kelleher

     21,300 21,300 48,299  332,565  9,162 9,162 80,454  448,793

    Douglas C. Barnard

     15,600 15,600 174,944  932,983 

    Christopher D. Bohn

     12,692 12,692 47,574  338,997 

    Bert A. Frost

     18,300 18,300 68,085  448,844 

    (1)
    Under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan, each of the named executive officers may elect to defer (i) up to 6% of his or her base salary in excess of the annual compensation limit under Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code and (ii) up to 100% of his or her annual incentive payment. Amounts in this column represent the amounts we credited to the accounts of the named executive officers during 2017.2019. There is typically an administrative delay between the time when a participant defers income under the plan and the time when we subsequently credit the participant's account. As a result of this delay, the amounts that we credited to the named executive officers' accounts during 20172019 differ slightly from the amounts that the named executive officers deferred during 2017.2019. All amounts included under "Executive Contributions" are also included in the "Salary" or "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" columns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 64.79.

    (2)
    For 2017,2019, for each named executive officer who elects to defer any of his or her base salary in excess of the annual compensation limit, we match (through further such credits to his or her deemed account) the portion (up to 6%) of his or her excess base salary that he or she elects to defer. Amounts in this column represent the amounts we credited to the accounts of the

    Table of Contents

      named executive officers during 2017.2019. These credits are also reported in the "All Other Compensation" column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 64.

      79.

    (3)
    Under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan, each of the named executive officers makes notional investments of his or her account balance from time to time in shares of (i) our common stock or (ii) the public mutual funds we offer to our employees as investment alternatives under our 401(k) Plan. In order to make these notional investments, the named executive officer notifies the third-party plan administrator of his or her selections. The plan administrator then tracks the published total return on the actual securities underlying the named executive officer's notional investments, and we credit or debit the named executive officer's deemed account balance accordingly. Since all such credits and debits are determined by a third-party plan administrator and set to equal the published total return on notional capital market investments selected in advance by the named executive officers, none of the amounts shown in this column are reported as above-market or preferential earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.

    (4)
    In general, deferred amounts are paid out in a lump sum upon the termination of the named executive officer's employment. The aggregate balance consists of executive contributions, company matching credits, and credits reflecting returns on the notional investments. The following amounts of the reported aggregate balance were compensation for 20152017 or 20162018 and are included in the "Salary" or "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" columns (in the case of executive

    Table of Contents

      contributions) or the "All Other Compensation" column (in the case of company matching credits) of the Summary Compensation Table on page 6479 for those years for the named executive (except that information for Mr. Bohn is only shown for 2016, his(other than Ms. Menzel whose first year as a named executive officer)officer is 2019):

    Name
     Executive
    Contributions
    in 2015
    ($)
     Registrant
    Contributions
    in 2015
    ($)
     Executive
    Contributions
    in 2016
    ($)
     Registrant
    Contributions
    in 2016
    ($)
      Executive
    Contributions
    in 2017
    ($)
     Registrant
    Contributions
    in 2017
    ($)
     Executive
    Contributions
    in 2018
    ($)
     Registrant
    Contributions
    in 2018
    ($)

    W. Anthony Will

     43,408 43,408 52,962 52,962  52,800 52,800 52,500 52,500

    Christopher D. Bohn

     12,692 12,692 101,700 13,500

    Douglas C. Barnard

     15,600 15,600 15,300 15,300

    Bert A. Frost

     18,300 18,300 75,960 18,000

    Dennis P. Kelleher

     40,510 18,202 21,554 21,554  21,300 21,300 21,000 21,000

    Douglas C. Barnard

     13,754 13,754 15,872 15,872 

    Christopher D. Bohn

       53,125 13,985 

    Bert A. Frost

     42,821 15,237 44,130 18,554 

    Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    We have entered into change in control agreements in effect with each of the named executive officers, each of which remains currentlyother than Mr. Kelleher who retired in effect.September 2019. Under the terms of the change in control agreements, the named executive officer is entitled to receive certain payments and benefits from us upon a qualifying termination, specifically if we terminate his or her employment without cause (other than by reason of his or her death or disability) or if he or she resigns because of good reason, in either case within the period of 24 months following (or in certain cases prior to) a change in control (as such terms are defined in the agreements).

    Under the change in control agreements, a named executive officer will be deemed to have good reason if we:

    fail to pay histhe specified annual salary or provide certain benefits;

    assign him duties inconsistent with hissuch officer's current position or substantially and adversely alter histhe responsibilities;

    fail to continue any compensation plan that constitutes a material portion of histhe compensation; or

    Table of Contents

    change histhe primary employment location by more than 35 miles.

    Following a qualifying termination, the change in control agreements for each named executive officer provide for (i) a lump sum payment to the named executive officer equal to two times (or, three times in the case of Mr. Will) the sum of histhe officer's base salary and target annual incentive payment; (ii) welfare benefit continuation for a period of two years (or three years, in the case of Mr. Will) and outplacement services for a period of up to two years; and (iii) a pro-rata annual incentive payment for the year of termination, assuming target levels of performance or, if higher, actual year-to-date performance.

    In addition, ifThe named executive officer will also receive a cash payment equal to the contributions that we would have made on his or her behalf for a period of two years (or, three years in the case of Mr. Will) under our defined contribution 401(k) Plan and the related amounts that we would have credited to his or her account balance under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan. If the named executive officer is otherwise eligiblenot fully vested in his or her benefits under these plans, the officer will also receive a cash payment equal to participate in our New Retirement Plan, hehis or her unvested benefits.

    In addition, the named executive officers other than Messrs. Barnard and Frost will receive a cash payment equal to the actuarial value of two additional years (or, three additional years in the case of Mr. Will) of age and service credit under the planour defined benefit New Retirement Plan and will be credited with two additional years (or, three additional years in the case of Mr. Will) of age and service credit under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan. If the named executive officer is not fully vested in his or her benefits under these plans, hethe officer will also receive a cash payment equal to his or her unvested benefits.

    The named executive officer will also receive a cash payment equal to the contributions that we would have made on his behalf for a period of two years (or, three years in the case of Mr. Will) under our 401(k) Plan and the related amounts that we would have credited to his account balance under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan. If the named executive officer is not fully vested in his benefits under these plans, he will also receive a cash payment equal to his unvested benefits.


    Table of Contents

    The named executive officer will not be obligated to seek other employment in mitigation of the payments and benefits to be provided, and no such other employment will reduce our obligation to make such payments and to provide such benefits to him under the agreements.

    The change in control agreements of the named executive officers, other thanfor Messrs. Will, KelleherBarnard and Bohn,Frost, which were entered into in 2007 and 2008, respectively, further provide that, if any of the payments to the named executive officer become subject to the "golden parachute" excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the named executive officer will be entitled to receive an additional gross-up payment such that, after payment by him of all taxes, including any excise tax imposed upon the gross-up payment, he will receive the net after-tax benefit that he would have received had the excise tax not been imposed. ForThe change of control agreements for Messrs. Will Kelleher, and Bohn and Ms. Menzel do not provide for a gross-up payment. The change in control agreements for each of these three named executive officers provide that payments that would be subject to the excise tax will be reduced to the greatest amount that he or she may receive without becoming subject to the excise tax, unless he or she would be better off on an after-tax basis (including following application of the excise tax) receiving the full amount of such payments, in which case no such reduction will be applied.

    In December 2014, the Board adopted a policy whereby the company will not in the future enter into any new agreements with its named executive officers that include Internal Revenue Code Section 280G excise tax "gross-up" provisions with respect to payments contingent on a change in control of the company.

    Each of the named executive officers will be required to sign a release of claims at the time of the qualifying termination as a condition to receiving any such payments or benefits from us under his of her change in control agreement.

    The named executive officer will not be obligated to seek other employment in mitigation of the payments and benefits to be provided, and no such other employment will reduce our obligation to make such payments and to provide such benefits to him or her under the agreements.

    In addition, upon a change in control (as defined in our Equity and Incentive Plans) the restrictions, limitations, and conditions applicable to outstanding RSUs, PRSUs, stock options,


    Table of Contents

    and other plan-based awards will lapse, any performance goals will be deemed to be fully achieved, and the awards will become fully vested and exercisable, which for the annual incentive payment means payment at target-level performance, pro-rated for the portion of the year the executive officer was employed prior to the change in control, as set forth in the applicable incentive award letter.

    In December 2014, the Board adopted a policy whereby the company will not in the future enter into any new agreements with its named executive officers that include Internal Revenue Code Section 280G excise tax "gross-up" provisions with respect to payments contingent on a change in control of the company.

    Assuming a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2017,2019, with a transaction price equal to the closing price for our stock ($42.5447.74 per share) on the NYSE as of December 29, 201731, 2019 (the last trading day of 2017)2019), each of the named executive officers (other than Mr. Kelleher) would have been entitled to receive the following estimated severance benefits upon a qualifying termination of his or her employment on such date:

    Name
     Severance
    Amount(1)
    ($)
     Defined Benefit
    Pension Plan
    Enhancement(2)
    ($)
     Retirement
    Savings Plan
    Enhancement(3)
    ($)
     Early
    Vesting of
    Restricted
    Stock
    Units(4)

    ($)
     Early
    Vesting of
    Stock
    Options(5)
    ($)
     Other
    Change in
    Control
    Benefits(6)
    ($)
     Estimated
    Excise Tax
    Gross Up(7)
    ($)
     Total
    ($)
      Severance
    Amount(1)
    ($)
     Defined
    Benefit
    Pension Plan
    Enhancement(2)
    ($)
     Retirement
    Savings Plan
    Enhancement(3)
    ($)
     Early
    Vesting of
    RSUs and
    PRSUs(4)
    ($)
     Early
    Vesting
    of Stock
    Options(5)
    ($)
     Other
    Change in
    Control
    Benefits(6)
    ($)
     Estimated
    Excise Tax
    Gross Up(7)
    ($)
     Total
    ($)

    W. Anthony Will

     9,660,000 207,000 207,000 6,622,415 6,255,634 97,316  23,049,365  9,660,000 207,000 207,000 16,144,665 2,323,417 94,947 N/A 28,637,029

    Dennis P. Kelleher

     2,937,500 62,500 75,000 1,981,513 1,758,165 61,812  6,876,490 

    Christopher D. Bohn

     2,640,000 72,000 72,000 3,142,772 372,637 70,213 N/A 6,369,622

    Douglas C. Barnard

     2,332,000  63,600 1,344,051 1,162,696 74,742  4,977,089  2,376,000  64,800 3,145,398 438,404 69,855  6,094,456

    Christopher D. Bohn

     2,050,000 55,000 60,000 1,150,494 984,051 74,852  4,374,397 

    Bert A. Frost

     2,530,000  69,000 1,515,488 1,327,199 74,866  5,516,553  2,640,000  72,000 3,911,481 504,153 70,019  7,197,654

    Susan L. Menzel

     2,152,500 42,000 63,000 2,024,462  56,163 N/A 4,338,125

    (1)
    This amount represents a cash payment to the named executive officer equal to (i) two times (or, in the case of Mr. Will, three times) the sum of his or her base salary and target annual incentive payment plus (ii) an annual incentive payment for the year of termination, assuming target level of performance.

    (2)
    This amount represents a cash payment to the named executive officer equal to the contributions that we would have made on his or her behalf for a period of two years (or, in the case of Mr. Will, three years), assuming each named executive officer contributed the maximum allowable amount under our New Retirement Plan (a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan) and the related amounts

    Table of Contents

      we would have credited to his or her account balance under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan (a nonqualified benefits restoration and deferred compensation plan).



    (3)
    This amount represents a cash payment to the named executive officer equal to the contributions that we would have made on his or her behalf for a period of two years (or, in the case of Mr. Will, three years), assuming each named executive officer contributed the maximum allowable amount under our 401(k) Plan and the related amounts we would have credited to his or her account balance under our Supplemental Benefit and Deferral Plan.

    (4)
    This amount represents the value attributable to the accelerated vesting of outstanding awards of RSUs and PRSUs held by the named executive officer, which is deemed to equal the market value on December 31, 20172019 of the RSUs and PRSUs that would otherwise have been unvested as of such date. Payout value of PRSUs granted during 2015, 2016,2017, 2018, and 20172019 assumes target performance level.

    (5)
    This amount represents the value attributable to the accelerated vesting of outstanding stock option awards held by the named executive officer, which is deemed to equal, for each stock option that would otherwise have been unvested as of such date, the amount by which (x) the aggregate market value on December 31, 20172019 of the underlying stock exceeded (y) the aggregate exercise price of the stock option.

    (6)
    This amount represents the present value of the continuation of certain welfare benefits for the named executive officer for a period of two years (or, in the case of Mr. Will, three years) and the value of outplacement services for the named executive officer for a period of up to two years.

    (7)
    This amount represents an excise tax gross-up paymentThe change in control agreements for Messrs. Barnard and Frost, which were entered into in 2007 and 2008, respectively, provide that, if any of the payments to the named executive officer become subject to the "golden parachute" excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the named executive officer will be entitled to receive an additional gross-up payment such that, after payment by him of all taxes, including any excise tax imposed upon the gross-up payment, he will receive the net after-tax benefit he would have received had the excise tax not been imposed under Section 4999imposed. As reflected in the table, the named executive officers would not have received any gross-up payment in connection with a change of control assuming a transaction price equal to the closing price for our stock as of December 31, 2019. The change of control agreements for Messrs. Will and Bohn and Ms. Menzel do not provide for a gross-up payment.

    Table of Contents

    Dennis Kelleher Retirement and Separation Agreement

    On May 30, 2019, Dennis Kelleher resigned as Chief Financial Officer of the Internal Revenue Code.company, effective as of September 1, 2019 (the Retirement Date). In connection with Mr. Kelleher's pending retirement, the company and Mr. Kelleher entered into a Transition and Separation Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2019 (the Separation Agreement). Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Kelleher continued to receive his base salary of $625,000 through the Retirement Date. In addition, in connection with his execution of a release of claims in favor of the company, Mr. Kelleher will also receive (i) a pro rata portion of his 2019 bonus under the company's Annual Incentive Plan, based on actual performance for 2019 of the applicable corporate performance metrics, which amount is equal to $601,125, payable at the same time 2019 bonuses are paid to senior executives of the Company; (ii) continued payment of his base salary of $625,000 through December 31, 2020; (iii) payment of his target annual bonus for 2020 (90% of his base salary of $625,000 or $562,500), payable at the same time 2020 bonuses are paid to senior executives of the company; (iv) reimbursement of COBRA premiums for himself and his eligible dependents through the end of 2020; and (v) continued vesting of his outstanding company equity awards pursuant to the vesting schedule and terms of such awards and continued exercisability of any outstanding company stock options for four years following the Retirement Date or expiration of the term of the option, if earlier. On August 30, 2019, the last business day prior to the Retirement Date, the aggregate market value of Mr. Kelleher's RSUs and PRSUs was $4,152,050 and the aggregate in-the-money value of his unvested stock options was $675,187. Under the Separation Agreement, Mr. Kelleher agreed to make himself available as reasonably necessary to provide assistance with his transition, agreed not to disparage or impugn the reputation or goodwill of the company and also agreed that he would not compete or solicit company customers, clients or employees through December 31, 2020.

    CEO Pay Ratio

    In 2015, pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd—"Dodd – Frank Act"), the SEC adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of our median employee's annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our principal executive officer. The company's principal executive officer is Mr. Will.

    Mr. Will had 20172019 annual total compensation of $9,462,015,$8,758,243, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table included under the heading "Executive Compensation." Our median employee's 20172019 annual total compensation was $108,533.$119,957. As a result, we estimate that Mr. Will's 20172019 annual total compensation was approximately 8773 times that of our median employee. Due to the variability of Mr. Will's performance-based compensation, the CEO pay ratio can differ significantly from year to year. In addition, Mr. Will's 2019 annual total compensation reflected in the Summary Compensation Table, consistent with accounting rules, includes one-third of the total target number of PRSUs granted to Mr. Will in 2019 and one-third of the total target number of PRSUs granted to Mr. Will in 2018. If, for purposes of calculating the CEO pay ratio, the total target number of PRSUs granted to Mr. Will in 2019 was included in the 2019 annual total compensation of Mr. Will, instead of 1/3 of the total target number of PRSUs for 2019 and 1/3 of the total target PRSUs for 2018, we estimate Mr. Will's 2019 annual total compensation with such change would be approximately 84 times that of our median employee.

    The SEC rule permits a company to identify its median employee only once every three years, unless there has been a change in its employee population or employee compensation arrangements that the company reasonably believes would result in a significant change in the pay ratio disclosure. There has been no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would significantly impact the pay ratio


    Table of Contents

    disclosure. Therefore, we elected to use the same median employee we identified in 2017 for purposes of calculating the CEO pay ratio for 2019. We identified our median employee in 2017 by examining the 2017 total cash compensation (base salary and cash bonus) for all individuals, excluding our chief executive officer, who were employed by us on December 31,November 1, 2017. We included all employees, whether employed on a full-time, temporary or part-time basis. We did not make any assumptions, adjustments (including cost-of-living adjustments) or use any estimates with respect to determining total cash compensation, except that we annualized the compensation for our full-time and part-time permanent employees who were not employed by us for all of 2017. After identifyingWe calculated the median employee based on total cash compensation, we calculated the2019 annual total compensation for suchour median employee using the same methodology we use for our named executive officers as required to be set forth in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement.


    Table of Contents

    PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF PROVISIONS OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS GRANTING STOCKHOLDERS THE ABILITY TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS

    The Board is seeking stockholder ratification of the retention of the provisions of the company's certificate of incorporation and bylaws that give holders of record of at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the voting power of all outstanding shares of our common stock the ability, subject to satisfaction of specified procedural requirements and limitations, to require the company to call a special meeting of stockholders (the "Special Meeting Provisions"). The Board believes that the company's mechanism, described below, for stockholder-initiated special meetings continues to be appropriate and in the best interests of the company and its stockholders.

    Prior to our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provided that a special meeting of stockholders could be called only by the chairman of the Board, our president or the Board. At our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, the Board recommended that stockholders approve, and the stockholders approved, an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to grant holders of not less than 25% of our outstanding common stock the right to call a special meeting of stockholders subject to applicable procedural requirements and limitations (the "Special Meeting Charter Provisions"). In connection with the Special Meeting Charter Provisions, the Board approved corresponding changes to our bylaws, which became effective upon effectiveness of the Special Meeting Charter Provisions, establishing procedural requirements and limitations applicable to stockholder-initiated special meetings.

    Ratification of Retention of the Special Meeting Provisions

    The Special Meeting Provisions comprise (1) the Special Meeting Charter Provisions, which are set forth in Article IX(B) of our certificate of incorporation, and (2) Section 3 of Article II of our bylaws (the "Special Meeting Bylaw Provisions"), and may be summarized as follows:

    One or more stockholders of record owning shares representing at least 25% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the company have the ability to require the company to call a special meeting of the stockholders.

    Stock ownership is determined under a "net long" standard to provide assurance that stockholders seeking to call a special meeting possess both (i) full voting and investment rights pertaining to the shares and (ii) the full economic interest in (including the opportunity for profit and risk of loss on) such shares.

    Stockholders seeking to call a special meeting are required to submit to the company's secretary a written request in proper form and provide information similar to the information required under the company's advance notice bylaw provisions for stockholder proposals or nominations at annual meetings.

    The right of stockholders to call a special meeting is subject to certain limitations designed to prevent duplicative and unnecessary meetings by eliminating proposals that, among other things:

    are not proper subjects for stockholder action under applicable law;

    are received during the period beginning 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the prior annual meeting of stockholders and ending on the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders;

    Table of Contents

      are substantially similar to another item, other than the election or removal of directors, that was presented at a meeting of stockholders held within the prior 12 months;

      are for the election or removal of directors and the election or removal of directors was presented at a meeting of stockholders held within the prior 90 days; or

      are substantially similar to another item that is included in our notice of meeting as an item of business to be brought before a stockholder meeting that has been called but not yet held or that is called for a date within 120 days of the company's receipt of the special meeting request.

    The foregoing general description of the Special Meeting Provisions is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Special Meeting Charter Provisions, a copy of which is included in Appendix A to this proxy statement, and the Special Meeting Bylaw Provisions, a copy of which is included in Appendix B to this proxy statement.

    Purpose of the Special Meeting Provisions

    Board Consideration of Appropriate Stockholder Special Meeting Rights. The Board has evaluated a number of different factors in adopting and retaining the existing right of stockholders to call a special meeting, including stockholder interest in having a meaningful right to call a special meeting, the resources required to convene a special meeting, and the opportunities stockholders otherwise have to engage with the Board and senior management in between annual meetings.

    Existing Right Takes into Account Significant Costs Associated with Special Stockholder Meetings and is Designed to Ensure that Stockholder-Initiated Special Meeting will be Called only if Significant Portion of Stockholder Base Believes in Urgency of Holding such Special Meeting. Organizing and preparing for a special meeting involves significant commitment of management time and attention, reducing management's capacity to focus on other business priorities, and imposes substantial legal, administrative and distribution costs on the company. The Board believes that special meetings should be called only to consider extraordinary matters that are of interest to a broad base of stockholders and must be addressed before the next annual meeting. The current 25% ownership threshold is designed to strike a balance between assuring that stockholders have a meaningful right to call a special meeting and protecting against the risk that a small minority of stockholders with narrow or special interests could request one or more special meetings that could impose unnecessary costs on the company and disrupt the company's business.

    25% Special Meeting Ownership Threshold is Consistent with Market Practice. The existing 25% ownership threshold for our stockholders to call special meetings is consistent with market practice among large U.S. public companies that offer stockholders the right to call a special meeting: Of U.S.-based companies in the S&P 500 the stockholders of which are permitted to call a special meeting, approximately 67% set an ownership threshold of 25% or greater.

    Corporate Governance Practices

    The Board believes that the existing right of stockholders to call special meetings should be considered in the context of the company's overall corporate governance. The company regularly engages with its stockholders regarding governance matters, obtaining valuable feedback that contributes to the Board's decision-making with respect to such matters. The company has demonstrated accountability and responsiveness to the views and concerns of stockholders by:

    maintaining an independent chairman of the Board and separate chief executive officer;

    declassifying the Board;

    implementing majority voting in uncontested elections of directors;

    Table of Contents

    adopting a "proxy access" right for nominating directors;

    eliminating all supermajority voting provisions from our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws;

    adopting a policy whereby, if the Board adopts a stockholder rights plan without prior stockholder approval, the Board will submit the stockholder rights plan to the company's stockholders for ratification, or the stockholder rights plan must expire, within one year of such adoption; and

    establishing stockholders' existing right to call special meetings.

    The Board has also established a process to receive communications from stockholders, whereby stockholders may contact any member (or all members) of the Board outside the annual meeting cycle. Consistent with its current practice, the Board will continue to evaluate appropriate corporate governance measures and changes to the company's governance structure, policies and practices that it believes will serve the best interests of the company and its stockholders.

    Given the company's strong corporate governance practices and the fact that the existing right of stockholders to call special meetings is aligned with market practices, the Board strongly recommends that stockholders ratify the existing Special Meeting Provisions.

    The company has omitted from its proxy materials for the Annual Meeting a stockholder proposal to lower the ownership threshold for our stockholders to call special meetings from 25% to 10%. As discussed above, the Board believes that the existing Special Meeting Provisions, including the 25% ownership threshold, strike a reasonable balance between enhancing stockholder rights and protecting against the risk that a small minority of stockholders could request one or more special meetings that could result in unnecessary financial expense and disruption to the company's business. The Board believes that the company's existing mechanism for stockholder-initiated special meetings continues to be appropriate and an important element of CF's strong corporate governance policies. The company believes that a vote in favor of Proposal 3 is tantamount to a vote against a proposal to lower the ownership threshold for our stockholders to call a special meeting from 25% (as set forth in the existing Special Meeting Provisions) to 10%.

    This Proposal 3 is advisory in nature. If the Special Meeting Provisions are not ratified by our stockholders, no immediate changes will be made to the existing Special Meeting Provisions, and our management and the Board will conduct additional stockholder engagement to ensure that the company's corporate governance practices, including the ownership threshold for stockholders' right to call special meetings, remain aligned with the expectations of our stockholders.

    BOARD RECOMMENDATION

    The Board of Directors Unanimously Recommends that Stockholders Vote "FOR" the Proposal to Ratify the Retention of the Special Meeting Provisions.


    Table of Contents

    PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR 20182020

    The audit committee has selected KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of our financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting for 2018.2020. KPMG was our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

    KPMG representatives are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate stockholdershareholder questions.

    We are asking our stockholdersshareholders to ratify the selection of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.2020. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of KPMG to our stockholdersshareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance practice. Should the stockholdersshareholders fail to provide such ratification, the audit committee will reconsider its approval of KPMG as our independent registered public accountants for 2018.2020. Even if the selection is ratified, the audit committee in its discretion may select a different registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of CF Industries and its stockholders.shareholders.

    Unless otherwise instructed, we will vote all proxies we receive FOR ratifying the selection of KPMG as the company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.2020.

    BOARD RECOMMENDATION

    The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to ratify the selection of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.2020.

    AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT FEES

    On behalf of CF Industries and its affiliates, the audit committee retained KPMG to audit our consolidated financial statements for 2017.2019. In addition, the audit committee retained KPMG, as well as other accounting firms, to provide other auditing and advisory services in 2017.2019.

    The aggregate fees for professional services provided by KPMG with respect to these various services for 20172019 and 20162018 were:

     
     2017 2016 

    Audit fees(1)

     $3,965,000 $3,879,850 

    Audit-related fees

         

    Tax fees

         

    All other fees

         

    Total

     $3,965,000 $3,879,850 
     
     2019 2018 

    Audit Fees(1)

       $3,850,759   $3,963,100 

    Audit-Related Fees

        —    — 

    Tax Fees

        —    — 

    All Other Fees

        —    — 

                    Total

       $3,850,759   $3,963,100 

    (1)
    Audit fees consisted principally of audit and review work performed on the consolidated financial statements, as well as work generally only the independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably be expected to provide, such as statutory audits and review of documents filed with the SEC.

    Table of Contents

    PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES

    Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence, the audit committee has responsibility for appointing, setting the compensation of, and overseeing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, the audit committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

    Prior to engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for the next year's audit, management will submit a list of services and related fees expected to be rendered during that year within each of four categories of services to the audit committee for approval.

    Audit services include audit and review work performed on the financial statements and audit work related to internal control over financial reporting, as well as work that generally only the independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably be expected to provide, including statutory audits and review of documents filed with the SEC.

    Audit-related services are for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, including due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, employee benefit plan audits, and consultation regarding financial accounting and reporting standards.

    Tax services include all services, except those services specifically related to the audit of the financial statements, performed by the independent registered public accounting firm's tax personnel, including tax compliance, tax planning, and other tax advice.

    All other services are those services not captured in the audit, audit-related, or tax categories. The company generally doesn't request such services from the independent registered public accounting firm.

    Prior to engagement, the audit committee pre-approves independent registered public accounting firm services within each category. The fees are budgeted and the audit committee requires the independent registered public accounting firm and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year by category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval categories. In those instances, the audit committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging the independent registered public accounting firm.

    The audit committee has delegated specific pre-approval authority to the chair of the audit committee provided that the estimated fee for any such engagement does not exceed $100,000. The chair of the audit committee must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next scheduled meeting.

    AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE

    We understand the need for KPMG to maintain objectivity and independence in its audit of our financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting. To minimize relationships that could appear to impair the objectivity of KPMG, our audit committee has restricted the non-audit services that KPMG may provide to us primarily to audit-related services and tax services. The committee also has determined that we will only obtain these non-audit services from KPMG when the services offered by KPMG are more effective or economical than services available from other service providers, and, to the extent possible,


    Table of Contents

    only after competitive bidding. It is the audit committee's goal that the fees we pay KPMG for non-audit services should not exceed the audit fees paid to KPMG.

    Our audit committee has adopted restrictions on our hiring of any KPMG partner, director, manager, staff, advising member of the department of professional practice, reviewing actuary, reviewing tax professional, and any other persons having responsibility for providing audit assurance on any aspect of their certification of our financial statements.


    Table of Contents

    AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

    The audit committee is responsible for monitoring the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our system of internal controls, and the independence and performance of our internal and independent auditors. The audit committee is also responsible for the selection, evaluation, and oversight of our independent auditors. The audit committee is composed of sixfive non-employee directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. Each member of the audit committee is independent within the meaning of the rules ofunder the corporate governance standards of the NYSE applicable to audit committee members.

    Management is responsible for the financial reporting process, including establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. KPMG, our independent auditor, is responsible for auditing the financial statements. The audit committee's responsibility is to monitor and review these processes. The audit committee relies on the accuracy and completeness of the information provided to it and on the representations made by management and KPMG.

    During 2017,2019, the audit committee held nine meetings and met in executive session at each of the five meetings that were held in person and at one of the telephonic meetings.person. The audit committee reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG the audited consolidated financial statements of CF Industries for the year ended December 31, 20172019 and KPMG's evaluation of the company's internal control over financial reporting. The audit committee also discussed with KPMG the matters that are required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, "Communications with Audit Committees," issued bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and Rule 2-07 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.SEC. In addition, the audit committee received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor's communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the audit committee discussed with KPMG that firm's independence. The audit committee also considered whether the provision of non-audit services by KPMG was compatible with maintaining its independence.

    Based on its review and the foregoing meetings, discussions, and reports, and subject to the limitations on its role and responsibilities referred to above and in the audit committee charter, the audit committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements of CF Industries for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, as audited by KPMG, be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC. The audit committee selected KPMG as our independent auditor for 20182020 and recommended to the Board that the Board seek stockholdershareholder ratification of the selection of KPMG.

    Theresa E. Wagler (Chair)
    Robert C. Arzbaecher
    William Davisson
    John W. Eaves
    Stephen J. Hagge


    Robert G. Kuhbach

    Table of Contents

    PROPOSAL 4: SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING THE RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT

    Information regarding a shareholder proposal is set forth below. CF Industries disclaims any responsibility for the content of this proposal and statement of support, which is presented as received from the shareholder. John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, has advised us that he owns no fewer than 100 shares of our common stock and has given us notice that this proposal will be presented at the Annual Meeting.


    Proposal 4 – Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent

    Resolved, Shareholders request that our board of directors undertake such steps as may be necessary to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to cast the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This written consent is to be consistent giving shareholders the fullest power to act by written consent consistent with applicable law. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any valid topic for written consent.

    This proposal topic won majority shareholder support at 13 major companies in a single year. This included 67%-support at both Allstate and Sprint. Hundreds of major companies enable shareholder action by written consent. This proposal topic would have received a vote still higher than 67% at Allstate and Sprint if more shareholders at these 2 companies had access to independent proxy voting advice.

    This proposal topic also won 44%-support at Capital One Financial in 2017 which then increased to 56%-support in 2019.

    The right for shareholders to act by written consent is gaining acceptance as a more important right than the right to call a special meeting. This seems to be the conclusion of the Intel Corporation (INTC) shareholder vote at the 2019 Intel annual meeting.

    The directors at Intel apparently thought they could divert shareholder attention away from written consent by making it less difficult for shareholders to call a special meeting. However Intel shareholders responded with greater support for written consent in 2019 compared to 2018.

    Also CF Industries may not have a meaningful right for shareholders to call a special meeting. The 25% long stock ownership threshold to call a special meeting can be a 50% long stock ownership threshold to call a special meeting for all practical purposes after company attorneys do the screening out process. Plus our directors further restricted the original shareholder right to call a special meeting in April 2018.

    The 2019 CF Industries proxy hyped the "shareholder outreach campaigns" of CF Industries. Such campaigns apparently did not foresee that CF Industries executive pay would be rejected by 28% of shares in 2019 when a 5% rejection is the norm for a well performing company. This 28% rejection also does not reflect well on Stephen Hagge who chaired the CF Industries executive pay committee.

    The expectation is that, once this proposal is adopted, shareholders would not need to make use of this right of written consent because its mere existence will act as a guardrail to help ensue that our company is better overseen by our Directors. Our Directors will want to avoid shareholder action by written consent and will thus have more of an incentive to improve their oversight responsibility.

    Please vote yes:
    Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent – Proposal 4


    Table of Contents

    THE BOARD'S STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION

    The Board unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.

    The Board has given careful consideration to the shareholder proposal regarding the right of shareholders to act by written consent and to the rejection by the company's shareholders of a substantially similar proposal submitted by the same proponent at the 2015, 2016 and 2019 annual meetings of shareholders. The Board continues to believe that the actions requested by the proponent are not in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. Moreover, the Board believes that implementation of the proposal is unnecessary given the ability of holders of 25% or more of the company's outstanding common stock to call a special meeting of shareholders and in light of the company's responsiveness to shareholders on matters of corporate governance.

    The company's certificate of incorporation requires actions that are subject to a vote of the company's shareholders to be considered at a meeting of shareholders. This requirement assures that all shareholders receive advance notice of the proposed action and have an opportunity to discuss it and consider all points of view. In contrast, the proposal calls for the Board to take steps necessary to permit shareholder action by written consent, which would allow critical actions to be approved by holders of a bare majority of the company's outstanding common stock without notice to other shareholders and without an opportunity for discussion at a meeting of shareholders. This proposal, if adopted, could therefore result in action being taken without the knowledge or participation of many shareholders—particularly smaller shareholders—thereby disenfranchising those shareholders, while enabling other short-term or special-interest investors to approve proposals that are not in the best interests of all shareholders. Allowing shareholder actions by written consent could also result in duplicative or contradictory written consents being circulated at the same time, wasting resources, confusing shareholders and hindering the ability of management and the Board to ensure the orderly and efficient conduct of the company's affairs. Because of such deficiencies, the Board believes that the written consent process is not appropriate for a widely-held public company like CF Industries.

    In 2014, the company amended its bylaws and, with shareholder approval, its certificate of incorporation to grant holders of not less than 25% of the company's outstanding common stock the right to call a special meeting of shareholders. This right to call special meetings allows shareholders to propose actions without waiting for the company's next annual meeting. Shareholder action taken at a special meeting is preferable to action by written consent, because a meeting allows all shareholders to participate in, and discuss the merits of, a proposed action, and allows the Board to make a considered recommendation about the action. Shareholder action by means of a shareholder-initiated special meeting is thus better suited than shareholder action by written consent to a culture of transparency and good corporate governance, and the ability of shareholders to call a special meeting makes unnecessary the written consent procedure contemplated by the proposal. The provisions of the company's bylaws and certificate of incorporation, including the 25% ownership threshold, under which shareholders may call a special meeting (the "Special Meeting Provisions") are designed to assure that shareholders have a meaningful right to call a special meeting while protecting against the risk that a small minority of shareholders with narrow or special interests could request one or more special meetings that could impose unnecessary costs on the company and disrupt the company's business. In April 2018, the Board amended the Special Meeting Provisions under the company's bylaws to expand the circumstances under which shareholders may require the company to call a special meeting of shareholders. Shareholders ratified the Special Meeting Provisions at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders in May 2018, with 73% of votes cast voting in favor of ratification.


    Table of Contents

    The Board further believes that the company's strong corporate governance practices make adoption of this proposal unnecessary. In addition to giving shareholders the right to call special meetings, the company's corporate governance practices already provide transparency and accountability of the Board to all of the company's shareholders. The company has demonstrated accountability and responsiveness to the views and concerns of shareholders by

      maintaining an independent chairman of the Board and separate chief executive officer;

      declassifying the Board;

      implementing majority voting in uncontested elections of directors;

      adopting a "proxy access" right for nominating directors;

      eliminating all supermajority voting provisions from our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws;

      adopting a policy whereby, if the Board adopts a shareholder rights plan without prior shareholder approval, the Board will submit the shareholder rights plan to the company's shareholders for ratification, or the shareholder rights plan must expire, within one year of such adoption; and

      establishing shareholders' existing right to call special meetings.

    We value the views of, and regularly communicate with, our shareholders on a variety of topics, such as our financial performance, corporate governance, executive compensation, and related matters. The Board has established a process to receive communications from shareholders, whereby shareholders may contact any member (or all members) of the Board outside the annual meeting cycle. See "Corporate Governance – Communications with Directors." In addition, as discussed in the sections of this proxy statement under the headings "Proxy Statement Summary – Shareholder Engagement" and "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Shareholder Engagement," we conduct shareholder outreach campaigns in the spring and in the fall.

    The Board believes that the company's current governance structure strikes an appropriate balance between permitting shareholders to raise important matters at any time and ensuring that all shareholders are afforded an opportunity for meaningful participation in a deliberative and democratic process based on accurate and complete public disclosure. Consistent with its current practice, the Board will continue to evaluate appropriate corporate governance measures and changes to the company's governance structure, policies and practices that it believes will serve the best interests of the company and its shareholders.

    For these reasons, the Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST the proposal.

    THE PROPOSAL IS ADVISORY IN NATURE, AND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT IN ITSELF GIVE SHAREHOLDERS THE RIGHT TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT. SUCH APPROVAL WOULD ONLY SERVE AS A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD. IF THE PROPOSAL IS NOT PROPERLY PRESENTED BY THE PROPONENT AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, IT WILL NOT BE VOTED UPON.


    Table of Contents

    ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

    Why did I receive these proxy materials?

    We are providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors of CF Industries Holdings, Inc. of proxies to be voted at our 20182020 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders and at any adjournment or postponement of such meeting.

    You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting on Thursday,Wednesday, May 10, 2018,20, 2020, commencing at 10:00 a.m., local time. The Annual Meeting will be held adjacent to our corporate headquarters at 3the Marriott Suites Deerfield, 2 Parkway North, Deerfield, Illinois 60015.

    We intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person. However, we are actively monitoring the coronavirus (COVID-19) situation. We are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements in advance of the Annual Meeting, and details on how to participate will be issued by press release available on our website at https://www.cfindustries.com and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

    Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, the company has elected to provide access to its proxy materials via the Internet. Accordingly, the company is sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to the company's stockholders.shareholders. All stockholdersshareholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the notice or request a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the notice. In addition, stockholdersshareholders may request proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. The company encourages stockholdersshareholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the expenses incurred by the company with respect to its annual meetings.

    How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

    The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will provide you with instructions regarding how to:

    view on the Internet the company's proxy materials for the Annual Meeting; and

    instruct the company to send future proxy materials to you by email.

    Choosing to receive future proxy materials by email will save the company the cost of printing and mailing documents to you. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email message next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.


    Table of Contents

    What will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

    At the Annual Meeting, stockholdersshareholders will be asked to:

    elect as directors the teneleven nominees named in this Proxy Statement;

    consider and approve an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of our named executive officers;

    ratify provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws granting stockholders the ability to call special meetings of stockholders;

    ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018;2020;

    act upon one shareholder proposal regarding the right to act by written consent, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and


    Table of Contents

    consider any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

    How many votes do I have?

    You will have one vote for every share of CF Industries common stock you owned on March 19, 201827, 2020 (the record date). If you were a stockholdershareholder of record as of the record date, you will retain your right to vote, even if you sell your shares after the record date.

    How many votes can be cast by all stockholders?shareholders?

    The total number of votes that can be cast by all stockholdersshareholders is 233,358,918,213,796,987, consisting of one vote for each share of common stock that was outstanding on the record date. There is no cumulative voting.

    How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

    A majority of the votes that can be cast must be present for us to hold the Annual Meeting. We urge you to vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, so that we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be present.

    How do I vote?

    You can vote either in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy, whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting.

    To vote by proxy, you must either:

    if you request printed copies of the proxy materials, fill out the proxy card, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope included with the printed materials;

    use the Internet site listed on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and proxy card; or

    call the toll-free telephone number listed on the proxy card.

    The telephoneInternet and Internettelephone voting procedures set forth on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and proxy card are designed to authenticate stockholders'shareholders' identities, to allow stockholdersshareholders to provide their voting instructions, and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone or through the Internet or by telephone, you should not return your proxy card.


    Table of Contents

    To ensure that your vote is counted, please remember to submit your vote so that we receive it at least one business day prior to the Thursday,Wednesday, May 10, 201820, 2020 Annual Meeting.

    If you hold your CF Industries common stock in "street name" with a bank, brokerage firm, dealer, trust company, or other nominee, only they can exercise your right to vote with respect to your shares. Please follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, brokerage firm, dealer, trust company, or other nominee to authorize a proxy to vote your shares. If you want to vote in person at the Annual Meeting and you hold your stock in street name, you must obtain a "legal" proxy from your broker and bring that proxy to the Annual Meeting.

    Can I change my vote?

    Yes. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the annual meeting by either:

    sending a new proxy card with a later date;

    sending a written notice of revocation to our corporate secretary at the address of our principal executive offices on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement;


    Table of Contents

    voting by telephone or through the Internet or by telephone at a later date; or

    attending the Annual Meeting, requesting that your previously submitted proxy not be used, and voting in person.

    What if I don't specify how my shares are to be voted?

    Whether you vote by mail, telephone, or the Internet, your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If you return a signed proxy card without indicating your vote or when voting on the Internet or by telephone you indicate that you wish to vote as recommended by the Board, your shares will be voted:

    FOR the election of the teneleven director nominees named in this Proxy Statement,

    FOR the advisory resolution on the compensation of our named executive officers,

    FOR ratification of the provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws granting stockholders the ability to call special meetings of stockholders, and

    FOR ratification of the selection of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.2020, and

    AGAINST the shareholder proposal regarding the right to act by written consent.

    How many votes are required to elect directors and to adopt the other proposals?

    With respect to Proposal 1, directors receiving a majority of votes cast (number of shares voted "for" a director must exceed the number of shares voted "against" that director) will be elected as a director.

    For each of Proposals 2, 3, and 4 and any other matter (other than Proposal 1) properly brought before the meeting, an affirmative vote of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon is required in order to approve such proposal.


    Table of Contents

    Can my shares be voted if I don't vote by proxy and don't attend the Annual Meeting?

    If you are a stockholdershareholder of record, you can vote by proxy or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. If you don't vote your shares held in street name, your broker can vote your shares on the ratification of the selection of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm. Your broker is not permitted to vote your shares on the election of the director nominees or any other matter on the agenda, other than the ratification of the selection of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm, without receiving instructions from you. This is referred to as a "broker non-vote." If you hold your shares in your own name, you must vote such shares in person or by proxy or they will not be voted.

    How are my votes counted?

    With respect to Proposal 1, you may either vote for or against or you may abstain with respect to the election of each nominee for the Board. If you abstain with respect to any nominee, your shares will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum, but will not be counted as votes cast with respect to the election of such nominee and, accordingly, will have no effect on the election of that nominee.

    For each of Proposals 2, 3, and 4, you may vote for or against or you may abstain onwith respect to the approval of the applicable proposal. If you abstain from voting on any of these proposals, your shares will be counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum, and the abstention will have the same effect as a vote against that proposal.

    Broker non-votes on any matter will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the voting on Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 4.


    Table of Contents

    Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

    We don't know of any other matters that will be considered at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters arise at the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted at the discretion of the persons named in the proxy.

    What happens if the Annual Meeting is postponed, adjourned, or delayed?

    Your proxy will still be good and may be voted at the postponed, adjourned or delayed meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.

    What procedures must I follow to attend the Annual Meeting?

    You will need proof of ownership of CF Industries stock to enter the Annual Meeting. When you arrive at the Annual Meeting, you may be asked to present photo identification, such as a driver's license. This will suffice if you hold your shares in your own name. If you hold your stock through a securities broker (that is, in street name), a recent brokerage statement or letter from your broker is an example of proof that you are the beneficial owner of such shares. No large bags, briefcases, or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting and stockholdersshareholders will not be permitted to use any cameras (including cell phones with photographic capabilities), recording equipment or electronic devices at the meeting.


    Table of Contents

    IMPORTANT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    Cost of Annual Meeting and Proxy Solicitation

    We pay the cost of the Annual Meeting and the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, we may solicit proxies by personal interview, telephone, and similar means. None of our directors, officers, and employees will be specially compensated for these activities. We also intend to request that brokers, banks, and other nominees solicit proxies from their principals, and we will reimburse the brokers, banks, and other nominees for certain expenses they incur for such activities.

    We have also retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated ("Innisfree") for consulting and solicitation services in connection with the Annual Meeting, for which Innisfree is anticipated to receive a fee of approximately $25,000. We have also agreed to reimburse Innisfree for out-of-pocket expenses and to indemnify Innisfree against certain liabilities and expenses, including legal fees and related charges.

    Available Information

    CF Industries makes available free of charge on or through the Investor Relations section of its website,www.cfindustries.com, its Annual Reports to Shareholders, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements and forms of proxy and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is filed electronically with, or furnished to, the SEC. The SEC also maintains a website atwww.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

    CF Industries will provide, without charge to any stockholdershareholder upon written request to our corporate secretary at the address of our principal executive offices on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement, a copy of its Annual Reports to Shareholders, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements and forms of proxy and all amendments to those reports.


    Table of Contents

    DEADLINES FOR SUBMISSION OF FUTURE STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS, STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER NOMINATED DIRECTOR CANDIDATES AND OTHER BUSINESS OF STOCKHOLDERSSHAREHOLDERS

    Proposals to be Considered for Inclusion in CF Industries' Proxy Materials

    Under SEC rules, a stockholdershareholder who intends to present a proposal at the 20192021 annual meeting of stockholdersshareholders and who wishes the proposal to be included in our proxy statement for that meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act must submit the proposal in writing to our corporate secretary at the address of our principal executive offices on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement. The proposal must be received no later than November 29, 2018December 9, 2020 (120 days before March 29, 2019,April 8, 2021, the one year anniversary of the anticipated mailing date of this Proxy Statement).

    Director Nominations for Inclusion in CF Industries' Proxy Materials (Proxy Access)

    Under the proxy access provisions of our bylaws, certain stockholdersshareholders and/or stockholdershareholder groups will be permitted to include stockholdershareholder nominated director candidates in our proxy materials for the 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders.shareholders. Requests pursuant to such proxy access provisions to include stockholdershareholder nominated director candidates in our proxy materials for an annual meeting in 20192021 must be delivered to, or mailed to and received by, our corporate secretary at the address of our principal executive offices on the Notice of Annual


    Table of Contents

    Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement no earlier than October 30, 2018November 9, 2020 (150 days before March 29, 2019,April 8, 2021, the one year anniversary of the anticipated mailing date of this Proxy Statement) and no later than November 29, 2018December 9, 2020 (120 days before March 29, 2019,April 8, 2021, the one year anniversary of the anticipated mailing date of this Proxy Statement). See the discussion in Proposal 1 under the heading "Proxy Access" and refer to our bylaws for details about the process to include stockholdershareholder nominated director candidates in our proxy materials.

    Other StockholderShareholder Proposals and Director Nominations (Advance Notice Provisions)

    Our bylaws require that written notice of (i) proposals intended to be presented by a stockholdershareholder at the next annual meeting, but that are not intended for inclusion in our proxy statement for that meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8, and (ii) nominees for the election of directors intended to be made by a stockholdershareholder at the next annual meeting be delivered to our corporate secretary at the address of our principal executive offices on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement no earlier than January 10, 201920, 2021 and no later than February 9, 2019.19, 2021. Such advance notice deadline will also be the deadline for a proposal to be considered "timely" proposals made in accordance withfor purposes of Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act. To be in proper written form, such a notice must set forth the information prescribed in our bylaws. You can obtain a copy of our bylaws by writing our corporate secretary at the address of our principal executive offices on the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement.


    Table of Contents

    OTHER MATTERS

    The Board of Directors knows of no other business to be presented at the 20182020 Annual Meeting. If, however, any other business should properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment thereof, the proxies will be voted at the discretion of the persons named in the proxy.

      By order of the board of directors,

     

     

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

    Douglas C. Barnard
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
    March 29, 2018April 8, 2020

    Table of Contents


    Appendix A


    CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC.
    SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
    NON-GAAP DISCLOSURE ITEMS

    ReconciliationThe company reports its financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Management believes that EBITDA and free cash flow, which are non-GAAP financial measures, provide additional meaningful information regarding the company's performance and financial strength. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, the company's reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, because not all companies use identical calculations, EBITDA and free cash flow included in this proxy statement may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of costother companies. Reconciliations of salesEBITDA and cost of sales per ton (GAAP measures)free cash flow to controllable cost of sales and controllable cost of sales per ton (non-GAAP measures), as applicable:the most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided below.

    Controllable cost of salesEBITDA is defined as cost of sales adjusted for natural gas costs, realized and unrealized losses (gains) on natural gas derivatives,net earnings attributable to common stockholders plus interest expense—net, income taxes and depreciation and amortization. Other adjustments include the elimination of loan fee amortization that is included in both interest and amortization, and the portion of depreciation that is included in noncontrolling interests.

    The company has presented controllable cost of sales and controllable cost of sales per tonEBITDA because management uses thesethe measure to track performance and believes that it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in the industry.

    Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities, as stated in the consolidated statements of cash flows, reduced by capital expenditures and distributions to noncontrolling interests. The company has presented free cash flow because management uses this measures and believes they areit is useful to investors, as supplemental financial measures inan indication of the comparisonstrength of year-over-year performance.

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2017 2016 2015 
     
     (in millions)
     

    Cost of sales

     $3,700 $2,845 $2,761 

    Natural gas costs(1)

      1,194  761  746 

    Realized net losses on natural gas derivatives(2)

      26  133  70 

    Unrealized net mark-to-market loss (gain) on natural gas derivatives

      61  (260) 176 

    Depreciation and amortization

      836  597  433 

    Expansion project start-up costs

        52   

    Total adjustments

      2,117  1,283  1,425 

    Controllable cost of sales

     $1,583 $1,562 $1,336 

    Tons of product sold (000s)

      19,952  16,957  13,718 

    Cost of sales per ton

     
    $

    185.45
     
    $

    167.78
     
    $

    201.27
     

    Decrease in cost of sales per ton

      (8)%      

    Controllable cost of sales per ton

     $79.34 $92.12 $97.39 

    Decrease in controllable cost of sales per ton

      (19)%      

    (1)
    Includes the cost of natural gascompany and its ability to generate cash and to evaluate the company's cash generation ability relative to its industry competitors. It should not be inferred that the entire free cash flow amount is included in cost of sales during the period under the first-in, first-out inventory cost method.

    (2)
    Includes realized gains and losses on natural gas derivatives settled during the period. Excludes unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses on natural gas derivatives.
    available for discretionary expenditures.


    Table of Contents

    Reconciliation of capital expendituresnet earnings attributable to common stockholders (a GAAP measure) to EBITDA (a non-GAAP measure):

     
     Year ended
    December 31,
    2019
     
     
     (in millions)
     

    Net earnings

     $646 

    Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

      (153)

    Net earnings attributable to common stockholders

      493 

    Interest expense—net

      217 

    Income tax provision

      126 

    Depreciation and amortization

      875 

    Less other adjustments:

        

    Depreciation and amortization in noncontrolling interests(1)

      (82)

    Loan fee amortization(2)

      (9)

    EBITDA

     $1,620 

    (1)
    For the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, amount relates only to CF Industries Nitrogen, LLC.
    (2)
    Loan fee amortization is included in both interest expense—net and capital expenditures per ton (GAAP measures)depreciation and amortization.

    Reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities (a GAAP measure) to on-going capital expenditures and on-going capital expenditures per ton (non-GAAP measures), as applicable:free cash flow (a non-GAAP measure):

    On-going maintenance capital expenditures are defined as capital expenditures adjusted for amounts related to capacity expansion projects, our disposed phosphate business, and improvement projects. The company has presented on-going maintenance capital expenditures and on-going maintenance capital expenditures per ton because management uses these measures, and believes they are useful to investors, as supplemental financial measures in the comparison of year-over-year performance.

     
     Year ended December 31, 
     
     2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 
     
     (in millions)
     

    Capital Expenditures

     $473 $2,211 $2,469 $1,809 $824 

    Capacity expansion project

      110  1,599  1,796  1,317  356 

    Phosphate segment capital expenditures

            15  59 

    Improvement projects

      50  60  101  49  93 

    On-going maintenance capital expenditures

     $313 $552 $572 $428 $316 

    Tons of nitrogen products sold (000s)

      19,952  16,957  13,718  13,276  12,945 

    Tons of phosphate products sold (000s)

            487  1,857 

    Capital expenditures per nitrogen sales ton

     
    $

    23.71
     
    $

    130.39
     
    $

    179.98
     
    $

    136.26
     
    $

    63.65
     

    Increase (decrease) in capital expenditures per nitrogen sales ton

      (63)%            

    On-going maintenance capital expenditures per nitrogen sales ton

     $15.69 $32.55 $41.70 $32.24 $24.41 

    Increase (decrease) in on-going maintenance capital expenditures per nitrogen sales ton

      (36)%            
     
     Year ended
    December 31,
    2019
     
     
     (in millions)
     

    Net cash provided by operating activities

     $1,505 

    Capital expenditures

      (404)

    Distributions to noncontrolling interests

      (186)

    Free cash flow

     $915 

     

    VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 9, 2018.19, 2020. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC. 4 PARKWAY NORTH, SUITE 400 DEERFIELD, IL 60015-2590 ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 9, 2018.19, 2020. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E41615-P04246E99785-P35294 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:following nominees: 1. Election of Directors Nominees: For Against Abstain The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3: ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1a. Robert C. Arzbaecher The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3 and 4.Javed Ahmed For Against Abstain 1b. William Davisson ! ! ! 2. Approval of an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s named executive officers. 1c. John W. Eaves 1d. Stephen A. Furbacher 3. Ratification of the provisionsselection of CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s certificate of incorporation and bylaws granting stockholders the ability to call special meetings of stockholders. ! ! ! 1e. Stephen J. Hagge 1f. John D. Johnson ! ! ! 1g. Anne P. Noonan 4. R at i f i c at i o n o f t h e s e l ec t i o n o f K P MG L L P a sKPMG LLP as CF Industries Holdings, Inc.'s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018. 1h. Michael2020. ! ! ! ! ! ! 1b. Robert C. Arzbaecher 1c. William Davisson 3. 1d. John W. Eaves For Against Abstain The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST proposal 4: 1e. Stephen A. Furbacher 4. Shareholder proposal regarding the right to act by written consent, if properly presented at the meeting. ! ! ! 1f. Stephen J. ToelleHagge 1g. Anne P. Noonan NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. 1h. Michael J. Toelle 1i. Theresa E. Wagler 1j. Celso L. White 1k. W. Anthony Will ! For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

    GRAPHIC

     


    Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report with Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com. E41616-P04246E99786-P35294 CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC. Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders May 10, 201820, 2020 10:00 a.m. This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Douglas C. Barnard and Dennis P. Kelleher,Christopher D. Bohn, and each of them, as proxies, each with the power of substitution, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side of this proxy card, all the shares of common stock of CF Industries Holdings, Inc., registered in the name of the undersigned, as of March 19, 2018,27, 2020, at the Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders of CF Industries Holdings, Inc., to be held May 10, 2018,20, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., local time, adjacent to CF Industries Corporate Headquarters at 3the Marriott Suites Deerfield, 2 Parkway North, Deerfield, Illinois 60015,IL 60015*, and any and all adjournments or postponements of that meeting. Receipt of the Notice of 20182020 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement is hereby acknowledged. *We intend to hold our annual meeting in person. However, we are actively monitoring the coronavirus (COVID-19) situation. We are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our annual meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements in advance of the annual meeting, and details on how to participate will be issued by press release available on our website at https://www.cfindustries.com and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR all nominees listed in proposal 1, and FOR proposals 2 and 3, and AGAINST proposal 4. (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Continued and to be signed on reverse side Address Changes/Comments:

    GRAPHIC